范文澜《中国通史简编》“剽取”钱穆《国史大纲》辨正
作者简介:李孝迁,华东师范大学历史学系教授 (上海 200241)。
基金项目:
本文是国家社会科学基金重点项目 "战时延安中国史读物研究"(25AZS016)的阶段性成果。
摘要: 范文澜在延安编写《中国通史简编》,融会了众多前人研究结果,其中钱穆《中国通史参考材料》和《国史大纲》从史料线索到历史观点为其提供支持,但并没有从《大纲》“剽取”材料之情形。《简编》与《大纲》叙事上的相近,一方面是由于共同的史源所致,另一方面《简编》确实从《大纲》获知史实来历,然后进一步扩展史料范围,取材于传统史籍,而非直接承袭钱著。延安史家之所以参考钱著,或因其多关涉底层疾苦、民生经济、统治者黑暗,颇有“进步”色彩,在一定程度上契合《简编》的叙事取向。1940年代初,钱穆的政治立场逐渐暴露,中共史家对他的态度由正向转为批判,《大纲》则成为靶点之一,从而遮蔽了《简编》与《大纲》的学缘关系。
A Correction on the Claim that Fan Wenlan's A Short General History of China “Plagiarized” Qian Mu's Outline of National History
Abstract: In Yan'an, Fan Wenlan compiled A Short General History of China, which incorporated the research outcomes of a multitude of preceding scholars. Among these works, Qian Mu's Reference Materials for A General History of China and Outline of National History furnished support for Fan's compilation, spanning from clues to historical sources to perspectives on historical events. Nevertheless, there existed no instance of “plagiarizing” materials from Outline of National History. The similarity in narration between A Short General History of China and Outline of National History can be attributed to two factors:First, it arose from their shared historical sources; Second, while A Short General History of China did gain insights into the origins of historical facts from Outline of National History, it subsequently expanded the scope of historical materials by drawing on traditional historical records, rather than directly inheriting Qian Mu's works. The underlying reason for historians in Yan'an referring to Qian Mu's works likely lies in the fact that these works extensively addressed the hardships of the underclass, issues related to people's livelihood and the economy, as well as the darkness of the ruling class-features that embodied a distinct “progressive” character and, to a certain degree, were congruent with the narrative orientation of A Short General History of China. In the early 1940s, Qian Mu's political stance gradually came to light. Historians of the Communist Party of China thus shifted their attitude toward him from a positive one to a critical one, with Outline of National History becoming a target of criticism. This development, in turn, overshadowed the academic affiliation between A Short General History of China and Outline of National History.