中国非常态制度的形成与转换
作者简介:王刚,中国海洋大学国际事务与公共管理学院教授,海洋发展研究院高级研究员(山东青岛 266100);宋锴业,山东大学政治学与公共管理学院助理研究员,社会治理研究中心研究员(山东青岛 266237)。
基金项目:
本文为国家社科基金重点项目“总体国家安全观下沿海特大城市风险的韧性治理研究”(21AZZ014)的阶段性成果。宋锴业为本文通讯作者
摘要: 党的十八大以来,总体国家安全观成为国家制度建设和治理实践的圭臬。在这一背景下的中国非常态制度形成和发展,亦成为中国防范和应对重大风险的重要制度创新。“平战结合”“专常兼备”等均被视为国家进行非常态治理的宝贵制度资源,但少有研究解释这些制度的形成、转换以及背后的功能机制。基于应急管理、突发公共卫生管理的案例发现,中国针对重大风险的制度实践多起源于临时性的事项应对,并遵循了事件应急、组织嵌套再到制度嵌入的变革脉络。这一过程包含三种稳定而重复的功能机制:首先是灵活衔接机制,国家将与新风险相关的含糊不清,以及为控制风险而采取的措施转化为运营和战略;其次是风险转译机制,即将各类风险组织化来重新分配责任;最后为制度嵌入机制,将风险相关主体和资源常态化的分配职责,嵌入在常规的组织运行体系中。以上述机制为核心的非常态制度蕴含着中国特色理论创新的路径,超越了西方“风险事件回应—行政体系应对—个人风险转化”的传统范式。
The Formation and Transformation of China’s Abnormal System
Abstract: Since the 18th National Congress of the Communist Party of China (CPC), the concept of a holistic approach to national security become the guiding principle of national system construction and governance practice. Under this background, the formation and development of China’s abnormal system also become an important innovation for China to prevent significant risks. “Combination of ordinary and military application” (平战结合) and “reserves of specialized and regular staff ” (专常兼备) are regarded as valuable institutional resources for the country to conduct abnormal governance, but few studies explain these systems. Based on the case of emergency management and public health emergency management, this paper find that most of the institutional practices for major risks in China originate from temporary event response, and follow the change context of event emergency, organization nesting and system embedding. This process includes three mechanisms: First, flexible linkage mechanism. The country will translate the ambiguity related to new risks and the measures taken to control risks into operations and strategies; Secondly, risk translation mechanism, the state organizes various risks to reallocate responsibilities; Finally, system embedding mechanism, which embeds the risk related subjects and the normalized allocation responsibilities of resources into the conventional organizational operation system. The abnormal system with the above mechanism as the core contains the path of theoretical innovation with Chinese characteristics, which goes beyond the western theoretical paradigm of “risk event response - administrative system response - personal risk transformation”.