清末四川财政的“集权”与“分权”之争:以经征局设立及其争议为切入点
作者简介:赖骏楠,复旦大学法学院副教授(上海 200433)
摘要: 对清末四川经征局的设立及其所引发的争议,需要以“官−绅”或“国家−地方精英”间权力博弈这一分析框架来进行理解。19世纪中叶以降,受困于内外军事危机的清政府对基层的控制力逐步被削弱,并在征税等基层治理事务中广泛依赖绅士参与。与全国趋势类似,晚清四川地方绅士亦广泛介入津贴、捐输、肉厘等赋税的征管,乃至从中谋取私利。四川总督赵尔巽在光绪三十四年(1908年)设立全省范围的专业征收机构−经征局,并以此接管原本由州县官或绅士负责的部分赋税的征收事宜,构成了对绅士征税权及相关利益的威胁。借助作为清末立宪运动之产物的省咨议局这一平台,四川绅士对经征局的设立和运行展开激烈批评,但始终未能动摇赵尔巽借助经征局统一全省财政的意志。由于晚清以来国权和绅权间未能形成相辅相成的同步发展格局,被绅权俘获的近代宪法和代议制度未能充分实现预期中的促进国家建设的目的,反而对后者构成了结构性阻力。
The Debate of Centralization and Decentralization in Late Qing Sichuan: Take the Establishment of the Taxation Bureau as a Start Point
- Available Online:
2019-08-01
Abstract: A framework of power relations between " official” and " gentry” or between " state” and " local elites” is suitable for analyzing the establishment and related debates of the taxation bureau in Late Qing Sichuan. Since the mid-19th century, Qing government’s social control at the local level had been increasingly weakened due to serious military crises. Accordingly, local gentries had widely participated in local governance including taxation at the same time. Similar to such tendency in the whole empire, late Qing Sichuan’s gentries also extensively intervened in the taxation of land tax surcharges and consumption tax and even abused such power for private benefits. Given such situation, Zhao Erxun, the Sichuan governor from 1908 to 1911, decided to establish a province-wide and professional taxation bureau, jingzhengju, and to take over several taxation responsibilities from local magistrates and gentries. Zhao’s action became a threat to the taxation power and related benefits of gentries. In the provincial assembly, which was a product of the late Qing constitutional movement and was controlled by the gentry, assemblymen vehemently criticized the newly founded taxation bureau. But Zhao did not concede in this matter. A unified and bureaucratized taxation system was a prerequisite for and a crucial part of modern state-building. Since state power and gentry power did not develop at the same pace after the mid-19th century, however, in the early 20the century modern constitution and the representative system captured by the gentry failed to a great extent to benefit state-building and even became a structural obstruction to such historical mission