摘要:
安史之乱以后,重塑中兴成为唐代政治的核心问题,而中晚唐重塑中兴兼具政治中兴与礼仪中兴双重面相,政治中兴体现在塑造“今皇”为中兴之主,礼仪中兴的核心在于构建李唐的配享帝与不祧庙。无论是中兴之主,还是不祧庙,主要源于开元四年唐玄宗在太庙之西别立的中宗庙。在唐代宗至唐穆宗年间,在包括牛僧孺在内的朝臣的塑造下,李唐“三圣”(太祖、唐高祖、唐太宗)成为李唐固化的配享帝与不祧庙,成为李唐神圣性与正统性的象征符号。中晚唐“三圣”赋予了强大的政治意涵,故而享有中兴不祧之主“美誉”的中宗庙遭到迁毁,唐宪宗削藩取得了绝大的成功,成为实至名归的中兴之主,但唐武宗会昌元年李德裕等加隆唐宪宗为不祧庙的奏议,同样流为泡影,其根源在于若改变“三圣”的神统地位,存在动摇李唐神圣性与正统性的政治风险。
Abstract:
After the An Shi Rebellion, reshaping the revival became a central issue in Tang politics. The reshaping of the revival in the middle and late Tang Dynasty had both political and ritual aspects. The political revival was reflected in shaping the reigning emperor as the political revival ruler, while the ritual revival centered on constructing the Tang's Peixiang emperors("配享帝") and permanent temples ("不祧庙"). Both the concept of the revival ruler and the permanent temples traced back to the fourth year of the Kaiyuan era, when Emperor Xuanzong of Tang separately established the Zhongzong Temple on the west of the main ancestral temple. During the reigns of Emperor Daizong of Tang to Emperor Muzong of Tang, under the influence of officials including Niu Sengru, the "Three Saints" of the Tang Dynasty-Taizu, Gaozu, and Taizong-were shaped into the solid Peixiang emperors, and the temples of which were set as permanent temples, symbolizing the sanctity and legitimacy of the Tang Dynasty. In the middle and late Tang Dynasty, the "Three Saints" carried profound political implications, and consequently, the Zhongzong Temple, once honored as a permanent temple of a revival ruler, was relocated and dismantled. Emperor Xianzong of Tang achieved great success in curbing the power of Fanzhen("藩镇") and was rightfully recognized as a revival ruler. However, in the first year of Huichang era, the proposal submitted by Li Deyu and others to elevate Emperor Xianzong's temple to a permanent temple ultimately came to nothing. The root cause laid in the political risk of destabilizing the sanctity and legitimacy of the Tang Dynasty by altering the sacred status of the "Three Saints".