产业政策、企业退出与区域生产效率演变

杨汝岱; 朱诗娥

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

Article Contents

Citation: Industrial Policy, Firm Exit and Regional Production Efficiency Dynamics in China[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(04) :33-45. shu

Industrial Policy, Firm Exit and Regional Production Efficiency Dynamics in China

Abstract

Market competition drives industrial dynamics. Theoretically, only productive firms can survive the fierce market competition. In the transitional China, protection oriented industrial policies implemented by local governments however may keep some less productive firms in the market. Industrial agglomeration further provides conditions to help firm survival. This study first explores the link between TFP and firm exit and then investigates the firm exit decision by highlighting the role of industrial policies and industrial agglomeration and specialization. Based on the Annual Survey of Industrial Firms in China during 1998—2007, this study found that exiting firms suffer from low efficiency while surviving firms are more productive. Statistical results indicate that firms located in industrial zones and granted with heavy subsidies are less likely to exit, showing the significant role of local protection policies. In cities with substantial concentration of industries, firms may compete with each other fiercely and only productive firms can survive. The dual roles of state power and market force can also shed light on the regional production efficiency dynamics in China
References
Access
1. [1]
  Zhao CHEN . Industrial Policies with Great Power Governance. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 46-57, 82.
2. [2]
  Yongqin WANG . How Industrial Policies Work. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(2): 37-55.
3. [3]
  Jing JIANG , Bingyao ZHANG . Deconstruction and Transformation: An Analysis of China’s Industrial Policy in Political Economy Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(12): 59-70.
4. [4]
  LIU Zhibiao . Models and Industry Chain Policies for Promoting the Construction of Modern Industrial System. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(11): 42-52.
5. [5]
  Ninghua ZHONG , Wanyi CHEN , Mi XIE . Features and Recent Evolution of Corporate Debt in China. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 77-87.
6. [6]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(01): 21-30.
7. [7]
  JIAN Zhixiang . Historical Transition Process of Language Policies in China. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(8): 123-144.
8. [8]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(07): 99-108.
9. [9]
  LIU Leyi , CAO Yueyang , CAI Jiming . The Driving Forces and Historical Experience of Dynamization of Static Comparative Advantage. Academic Monthly, 2025, 57(2): 67-76.
10. [10]
  Miaojie YU , Xiaotong WANG . China-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement and Chinese Enterprise Productivity. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 50-62.
11. [11]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(06): 37-52.
12. [12]
  PENG Diyun . Implementation on People's WellBeing —— A Study Based on the Development Strategy of Yangtze River Economic Belt. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(7): 61-73.
13. [13]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(12): 90-102.
14. [14]
  LI Pingliang . The Development and Evolution of Xuxun Worship Since Song and Ming Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(4): 177-186.
15. [15]
  Keyun ZHANG , Min LIU . Media Concern and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 57-71.
16. [16]
  Zhiyang LIU , Yongchang CHEN . Social Enterprise’ Hybrid Logic and Cross-sectoral Collaboration. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 85-98.
17. [17]
  Shaoqing HUANG , Siyi PAN , Hao SHI . Anti-Corruption, Transformation of Government-Business Relationships and Firm Performance. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(12): 25-40.
18. [18]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(01): 75-86.
19. [19]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(11): 67-101.
20. [20]
  Zhiqing DONG , Hui WANG . Urbanization, Economic Agglomeration and Heterogeneity of Regional Economic Growth. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 54-66.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 3896 Times PDF downloads: 44 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(44)
Abstract views(3896)
HTML views(474)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Industrial Policy, Firm Exit and Regional Production Efficiency Dynamics in China

Abstract: Market competition drives industrial dynamics. Theoretically, only productive firms can survive the fierce market competition. In the transitional China, protection oriented industrial policies implemented by local governments however may keep some less productive firms in the market. Industrial agglomeration further provides conditions to help firm survival. This study first explores the link between TFP and firm exit and then investigates the firm exit decision by highlighting the role of industrial policies and industrial agglomeration and specialization. Based on the Annual Survey of Industrial Firms in China during 1998—2007, this study found that exiting firms suffer from low efficiency while surviving firms are more productive. Statistical results indicate that firms located in industrial zones and granted with heavy subsidies are less likely to exit, showing the significant role of local protection policies. In cities with substantial concentration of industries, firms may compete with each other fiercely and only productive firms can survive. The dual roles of state power and market force can also shed light on the regional production efficiency dynamics in China

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Industrial Policy, Firm Exit and Regional Production Efficiency Dynamics in China

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Industrial Policy, Firm Exit and Regional Production Efficiency Dynamics in China

HTML

目录