深化土地体制改革与理顺经济运行
Deepen Land Reform and Rationalize the Economical Operation
-
摘要: 中国国民经济中存在的一个严重问题是:土地使用财产权不清晰,土地要素不能如十八届三中全会强调的由市场决定而竞争性配置。农村和城镇国有企业中的土地,由于不能由二级市场交易,或者是由政府低价和无偿划拨,土地价值被隐匿。而农村向城市配置的土地,却由于土地从农村由地方政府一家“购买”和由地方政府一家向千家出让,导致价格极端上涨。如果劳动力、资金和技术等要素可以按照市场经济的规则自由流动、互相交易、竞争定价、价值表达、市场调节,而土地要素却在上述方面不同程度地受限,则会导致国民经济运行的紊乱:要素总体配置效率低下,农业中劳动力淤积,资本要素不能流入农业和农村,农民失去以地为本进行创业和获得土地财产性等收入的机会,从而导致农村和城镇非户籍居民有支付能力的消费需求不足,进而使得城镇中工业品生产过剩,国民经济将增长乏力。本文的政策含义是:真正明确和给予农民以土地使用财产权,并永续使用;农村各类土地可以在城乡统一的市场上平等交易;农民有对自己土地的建设权。Abstract: The unclear land property rights making the land element cannot transact competitively by the market have been creating the serious problems in China’s national economy. The value of the lands in rural and the lands belong to the state-owned enterprises in urban are lower estimated and hidden. They cannot be traded on the market but have been allocated by the government at low prices even without compensation. Nevertheless, the prices of the lands which are allocated from the countryside to the cities are extremely surging. It is all because the local governments are acting as the dealers, who are the only buyer to expropriate the lands from the countryside but sold them to the thousands of the other buyers. The land factors are somehow limited to the above aspects, meanwhile the labor, capital, technology and other factors can be freely flowing, trading with each other, completive pricing, value expressing and market regulating in accordance with the rules of the market economy. It will lead to the chaos of the national economic operation: The lower general allocate efficiency of the factors, the siltation of the rural surplus labors, the paralyzed movements of the capital elements into the agriculture and the rural areas, the lost opportunities of the farmers using their lands to start a business and obtain the property incomes, are causing the inadequate of the demand of the affordable consumption of the rural residents and the non-registered residence in town. Furthermore, it is the reason causing the surplus productivities of the industrial goods in urban and the sluggish growth of the national economy. The policy implications of the paper are as follows: The truly clear and authorized the peasantry possessing the right of using property interest of the lands, and the sustainable rights to use them. All the types of rural lands can be traded equally in the unified urban and rural market. Famers have the right to construct their own lands.
-
表 1 城镇新建商品住宅销售情况及占当年GDP比例
年份 城镇住宅(亿平方米) 销售价格(元) 住宅价值(亿元) 占GDP比例(%) 2000 5.49 2112 11595 11.56 2001 5.75 2170 12478 11.25 2002 5.98 2250 13455 11.05 2003 5.50 2359 12975 9.44 2004 5.69 2778 15807 9.77 2005 6.61 3168 20940 11.18 2006 6.30 3367 21212 9.67 2007 6.88 3864 26584 9.84 2008 7.60 3800 28880 9.04 2009 8.21 4681 38431 11.01 2010 8.69 5032 43728 10.59 2011 10.25 5357 54909 11.22 2012 10.19 5791 59010 10.92 2013 11.94 6237 72287 12.14 2014 10.82 6324 68426 10.62 2015 11.59 6793 78731 11.43 2016 14.19 7226 102537 13.78 2017 7.18 7614 54668 6.61 2018 6.60 8737 57664 6.60 数据来源:国家统计局网站,数据查询,年度数据,http://data.stats.gov.cn/easyquery.htm?cn=C01. 表 2 2016年中国大陆与日、韩、中国台湾的农业相关数据比较
国家/地区 人均GDP
(美元)城市化水平
(%)工业增加值比例
(%)服务业增加值比例
(%)农业增加值比例
(%)农业就业比例
(%)中国大陆 12569 户籍41
常住57
平均4939.9 51.60 8.60 27.70 日本 37465 93.93 29.53 69.31 1.16 3.50 韩国 36103 82.71 38.56 59.24 2.20 4.90 中国台湾 42165 89.10 33.59 64.73 1.32 4.90 数据来源:国家统计局网站,世界银行网站。美元为购买力平价。 表 3 2017年中国大陆与一些地区耕地、就业和增加值比较
国家/地区 耕地面积
(亿亩)农业就业
(万人)劳均耕地
(亩)农业劳均增加值
(美元)非农业劳均增加值
(美元)中国大陆 20.24(2017) 20944 9.64 5027 19786 日本 0.70(2005) 227 30.83 24796 76297 韩国 0.27(2005) 129 20.90 25598 58642 中国台湾 0.12(2011) 55 21.81 13680 51841 美国 25.04(2005) 234 1070 73902 132804 数据来源:世界银行网站,国际货币基金组织网站,自然资源部网站,国家统计局网站。 表 4 土地征用、出让收入、农民应分额与产能过剩
年份 土地征用面积
(平方公里)出让土地收入
(亿元)农民应当分配的收入
(亿元)工业产能利用率
(%)产能过剩规模
(亿元)1998 515.54 507.7 355.39 − − 1999 340.47 514.3 360.01 − − 2000 447.25 595.6 416.92 − − 2001 1812.19 1295.9 907.13 − − 2002 2879.86 2416.8 1691.76 − − 2003 1605.6 5421.3 3794.91 − − 2004 1612.56 6412.2 4488.54 − − 2005 1263.5 5883.8 4118.66 − − 2006 1396.48 8077.6 5654.32 79.1 24371 2007 1216.03 12216.7 8551.69 81.3 25691 2008 1344.58 10259.8 7181.86 77.2 38904 2009 1504.69 17179.5 12025.65 73.1 50818 2010 1641.57 27464.5 19225.15 79.2 43367 2011 1841.72 33173 23221.1 80.4 47572 2012 2161.48 28517 19961.9 77.5 60650 2013 1831.57 41250 28875 75.8 70984 2014 1475.88 42606 29824.2 75.6 75477 2015 1548.53 32547 22782.9 74.3 81806 2016 1713.62 37457 26219.9 73.3 90285 2017 1570.17 52059 36441.3 77.0 83635 2018 1768.01 65096 45567.2 76.0 111171 数据来源:自然资源部网站、财政部网站、国家统计局网站;博势智库地产观察:《2018年全国土地市场分析报告》,2019年1月18日,www.sohu.com/a/289782018_475967. -

计量
- 文章访问数: 2086
- HTML全文浏览量: 186