普遍性叙事的“东方”悖论:反思与超越
A Critical Study on the “Oriental” Paradox of Western Universal Narrative
-
摘要: 西方世界对于东方国家长期存在偏见,这种偏见在启蒙时代被系统化,形成东方专制主义的论述传统。马克思“亚细亚生产方式”的论述,承袭了这种偏见,萨米尔·阿明用“纳贡社会”的概念,取代了“亚细亚生产方式”,从而发展出对于人类社会类型的全新论述。伴随着西方社会理论的“国家”和“帝国”转向,“纳贡社会”被转化为“纳贡帝国”,它成为对于人类前现代统治模式的一般概念。伴随着这一转型,西方中心论史学被扬弃,民族国家和资本主义的现代性叙述,被更为融合性的“帝国”论述取代,并成为全球史学的核心概念。Abstract: The Western world has a long-term prejudice against Eastern countries. This prejudice was systematized in the age of enlightenment and formed the intellectual tradition of oriental absolutism. Marx’s discussion of “Asiatic mode of production” inherited this prejudice. In order to correct and develop Marxism, Samir Amin replaced the “Asiatic mode of production” with the concept of “tributary society”, so as to develop a new discourse on the evolution of human society. With the turn of “state” and “empire” in Western social theory, “tributary society” has been transformed into “tributary empire”, which has become a general concept of pre-modern ruling mode. With this transformation, the Eurocentric historiography was abandoned, and the modernity narrative of nation-state and capitalism was replaced by a more integrated “empire” discourse which became the core concept of global history.
-
Key words:
- Asiatic mode of production /
- tributary empire /
- nation state /
- authoritarian
-

计量
- 文章访问数: 1512
- HTML全文浏览量: 278