苏报案交涉中的日本
作者简介:王敏,上海大学文学院历史学系教授(上海 200444)
作者简介:甘慧杰,上海社会科学院历史研究所助理研究员(上海 200235)
摘要: 关于因苏报案而起的中外交涉,学界的研究揭示,日本的存在感似乎相当弱,而且拖延到最后才明确表态,难免令人产生见风使舵或者是看英国脸色行事的联想。但是通过对日本外务省苏报案档案梳理和研究,发现在苏报案交涉当中,清政府一直把日本作为英国之外最重要的交涉对象,并且在对待引渡章太炎、邹容的问题上,日本也始终都反对引渡。然而出于维持同清政府的邦交和使自己处于主动地位的考量,在与清政府的单独交涉当中,往往表示不会庇护苏报案犯。在领事团和公使团内部讨论苏报案问题时,则以在请求本国政府的指示为托词,不肯明确表态。但是,不表态并不等于没有态度,反对引渡是日本的基本立场,即认为苏报案是政治案件,章、邹是政治犯。日本在苏报案问题上的真实态度反映出与中国具有共同政治文化传统的日本,此时已经以欧美国家处理国际关系的惯例来处理同中国的外交事务。考察苏报案交涉中的日本,是对苏报案研究的重要补充,同时亦可深化对20世纪初中日关系的认知。
A Study on Japan’s Attitude in the Negotiation of the Surrender of Supao Case Prisoners
- Available Online:
2021-04-20
Abstract: Previous studies show that Japan was not active and played the least influential role in the negotiation of the surrender of Supao Case prisoners, but this study, which is based on the Archives of Japanese Foreign Ministry reveals that Japan is the first power that Qing government negotiated with, and Japan has its own attitude, which is based much more on the western ideas than following the Britain government, is that Supao Case is a political case, and the prisoners can’t be surrendered to Qing government. Nevertheless, concerning of keeping good relation with Qing government, Japan, who is flexible in its diplomatic strategy, didn’t refuse Qing government directly, and was noncommittal in the diplomatic body in terms of waiting for the instruction from his own government.