良知、自然与科学之争：20世纪中国哲学的精神趋向

贡华南

English

贡华南

引用本文: 贡华南. 良知、自然与科学之争：20世纪中国哲学的精神趋向[J]. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(4): 32-44. shu

Citation: Hua’nan GONG. Controversy among Conscience, Nature and Science:The Spiritual Tendency of Chinese Philosophy in the 20th Century[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(4): 32-44. shu

良知、自然与科学之争：20世纪中国哲学的精神趋向

贡华南

作者简介: 贡华南，华东师范大学中国现代思想文化研究所/哲学系教授（上海 200241）;

中图分类号: B2

Controversy among Conscience, Nature and Science:The Spiritual Tendency of Chinese Philosophy in the 20th Century

Hua’nan GONG

Available Online: 2021-04-20
CLC number: B2

摘要: 作为20世纪中国哲学的关键词，科学、良知、自然各自的推崇者之间既有论争，又彼此吸取，相互塑造，使得三者的意义不断丰富，形成了新的科学观念、良知观念和自然观念。在这个过程中，学院派的中国哲学领域的学者透过良知、自然看科学，使科学不断良知化、自然化；良知则在与科学的论争中逐渐与之和解，而共同压制自然；自然在科学、良知的压制之下，亦不断与二者和解，进而被理解为人道出入之所由。良知、自然与科学之争是“古今中西”之争的具体表现，三者之间的张力也源源不断地拓展与丰富着中国哲学的内涵。三者之争的结果，使可信者可爱，可爱者可信，一定程度上化解了困扰中国学人百年之久的“可爱”与“可信”之间的紧张关系，把20世纪中国哲学推向新的境界，也为化解科学主义与人文主义的对立贡献了中国智慧。总结良知、自然与科学之争，不仅有助于深刻理解与把握20世纪中国哲学的丰富内涵，亦将裨益于21世纪中国哲学的新开展。
- 良知 /
- 自然 /
- 科学 /
- 中国哲学
Abstract: As the key words of Chinese philosophy in the 20th century, the admirers of science, conscience, and nature not only argued, but also learned from each other and shaped each other, which made the meaning of the three constantly enriched and formed three new concepts. In this process, Chinese philosophical scholars look at science through conscience and nature, and make science continue to be conscience and natural; conscience gradually reconciles with science in disputes with science, and jointly suppresses nature; nature is under the suppression of science and conscience, it constantly reconciles with the two, and then is understood as the reason for the humanity. The controversy among conscience, nature and science is a concrete manifestation of the dispute between ancient and modern, Chinese and Western, and the tension among the three has continuously expanded and enriched the connotation of Chinese philosophy. The result of the three disputes made the believable be lovely and the beloved believable. To a certain extent, it resolved the tension between the believable and the beloved that had plagued Chinese scholars for a century, and pushed Chinese philosophy in the 20th century. To a new realm has also contributed Chinese wisdom to resolve the opposition between scientism and humanism. Summarizing the controversy among conscience, nature and science will not only help profoundly understand and grasp the rich connotations of Chinese philosophy in the 20th century, but will also benefit the new development of Chinese philosophy in the 21st century.
- conscience /
- nature /
- science /
- Chinese philosophy
1. [1]
  王中江 . 中国“自然”概念的源流和特性考论. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(9): 15-34.
2. [2]
  吴震 , 刘昊 . 论阳明学的良知实体化. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(10): 14-21.
3. [3]
  程乐松 . 自觉的两种进路—— 中国哲学与汉语哲学的论域. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(7): 32-38.
4. [4]
  高源 . 理想人格的互鉴：芬兰学派奥古斯丁学新诠释及其与中国哲学的相遇. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(9): 38-48.
5. [5]
  吴晓明 . 重论“中国哲学”的合法性问题. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(4): 5-20.
6. [6]
  颜翔林 . 审美体验及其性质与对象. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(7): 150-158.
7. [7]
  高瑞泉 . 隐显之间：心学历程中的“自由意志”. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(11): 5-16.
8. [8]
  罗安宪 . 论老子哲学中的“自然”. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(10): 36-43.
9. [9]
  周建漳 . 科学革命与哲学的可能. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(4): 72-81, 150.
10. [10]
  陈金钊 . 法理学对中国哲学社会科学体系构建的意义. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(4): 106-120.
11. [11]
  黄瑞成 . 施特劳斯《哲学与律法》中的自然法问题. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(05): 27-33.
12. [12]
  吴国盛 . 博物学：传统中国的科学. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(04): 11-19.
13. [13]
  王炳权 . 论政治哲学与政治科学的关系. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(12): 71-80.
14. [14]
  董云虎 . 努力建设中国特色哲学社会科学学术话语体系. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(04): 5-10.
15. [15]
  夏国军 . 美国哲学整体论思潮的自然主义与反自然主义分形. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(10): 45-59.
16. [16]
  胡镓 . 阿里斯托芬政治谐剧中的自然哲学. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(05): 21-26.
17. [17]
  张帆 . “力”与“理”之间：欧战语境下中国“科学”概念的道德困境与意义转向. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(07): 109-122.
18. [18]
  蔡继明 , 郑敏思 , 刘梦醒 . 判断中国经济社会发展规划是否科学合理的标准. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(9): 46-56.
19. [19]
  吴震 . 王阳明的良知学系统建构. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(1): 11-22.
20. [20]
  许明 . 美学与认知科学. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(8): 145-165.

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 19
文章访问数: 1030
HTML全文浏览量: 151

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

良知、自然与科学之争：20世纪中国哲学的精神趋向

贡华南

作者简介:贡华南，华东师范大学中国现代思想文化研究所/哲学系教授（上海 200241）

网络出版日期: 2021-04-20

关键词:

良知 /
自然 /
科学 /
中国哲学

摘要: 作为20世纪中国哲学的关键词，科学、良知、自然各自的推崇者之间既有论争，又彼此吸取，相互塑造，使得三者的意义不断丰富，形成了新的科学观念、良知观念和自然观念。在这个过程中，学院派的中国哲学领域的学者透过良知、自然看科学，使科学不断良知化、自然化；良知则在与科学的论争中逐渐与之和解，而共同压制自然；自然在科学、良知的压制之下，亦不断与二者和解，进而被理解为人道出入之所由。良知、自然与科学之争是“古今中西”之争的具体表现，三者之间的张力也源源不断地拓展与丰富着中国哲学的内涵。三者之争的结果，使可信者可爱，可爱者可信，一定程度上化解了困扰中国学人百年之久的“可爱”与“可信”之间的紧张关系，把20世纪中国哲学推向新的境界，也为化解科学主义与人文主义的对立贡献了中国智慧。总结良知、自然与科学之争，不仅有助于深刻理解与把握20世纪中国哲学的丰富内涵，亦将裨益于21世纪中国哲学的新开展。

English Abstract

Controversy among Conscience, Nature and Science:The Spiritual Tendency of Chinese Philosophy in the 20th Century

Hua’nan GONG

Available Online: 2021-04-20

Abstract: As the key words of Chinese philosophy in the 20th century, the admirers of science, conscience, and nature not only argued, but also learned from each other and shaped each other, which made the meaning of the three constantly enriched and formed three new concepts. In this process, Chinese philosophical scholars look at science through conscience and nature, and make science continue to be conscience and natural; conscience gradually reconciles with science in disputes with science, and jointly suppresses nature; nature is under the suppression of science and conscience, it constantly reconciles with the two, and then is understood as the reason for the humanity. The controversy among conscience, nature and science is a concrete manifestation of the dispute between ancient and modern, Chinese and Western, and the tension among the three has continuously expanded and enriched the connotation of Chinese philosophy. The result of the three disputes made the believable be lovely and the beloved believable. To a certain extent, it resolved the tension between the believable and the beloved that had plagued Chinese scholars for a century, and pushed Chinese philosophy in the 20th century. To a new realm has also contributed Chinese wisdom to resolve the opposition between scientism and humanism. Summarizing the controversy among conscience, nature and science will not only help profoundly understand and grasp the rich connotations of Chinese philosophy in the 20th century, but will also benefit the new development of Chinese philosophy in the 21st century.

良知、自然与科学之争：20世纪中国哲学的精神趋向

作者简介: 贡华南，华东师范大学中国现代思想文化研究所/哲学系教授（上海 200241）;

Controversy among Conscience, Nature and Science:The Spiritual Tendency of Chinese Philosophy in the 20th Century

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

良知、自然与科学之争：20世纪中国哲学的精神趋向

作者简介:贡华南，华东师范大学中国现代思想文化研究所/哲学系教授（上海 200241）

English Abstract

Controversy among Conscience, Nature and Science:The Spiritual Tendency of Chinese Philosophy in the 20th Century

全文HTML

目录

良知、自然与科学之争：20世纪中国哲学的精神趋向

作者简介: 贡华南，华东师范大学中国现代思想文化研究所/哲学系教授（上海 200241）;

Controversy among Conscience, Nature and Science:The Spiritual Tendency of Chinese Philosophy in the 20th Century

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

良知、自然与科学之争：20世纪中国哲学的精神趋向

作者简介:贡华南，华东师范大学中国现代思想文化研究所/哲学系教授（上海 200241）

English Abstract

Controversy among Conscience, Nature and Science:The Spiritual Tendency of Chinese Philosophy in the 20th Century

全文HTML

目录