精神科学的逻辑演进

牛文君

English

精神科学的逻辑演进

牛文君

引用本文: 牛文君. 精神科学的逻辑演进[J]. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(12): 19-30. shu

Citation: Wenjun NIU. The Logical Progression of the Geisteswissenschaften[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 19-30. shu

精神科学的逻辑演进—以诠释学为中心

牛文君

作者简介: 牛文君，华东师范大学哲学系暨华东师大诠释学研究所副教授（上海 200241）;

中图分类号: B0

The Logical Progression of the Geisteswissenschaften

Wenjun NIU

Available Online: 2021-12-20
CLC number: B0

摘要: 随着自然科学革命的推进和传统人文领域的式微，精神科学的奠基逐渐被提上日程。精神科学、人文科学有没有自身的逻辑和方法论？这是19世纪下半叶以来哲学面临的重大问题，并在当今学术语境中依然显示出紧迫性。人文科学最初由维柯奠基，以诗性逻辑阐明人文知识的合法性，却忽略了知识的起源和有效性之区分；狄尔泰通过建构描述心理学和诠释学的方法论，在精神科学的奠基与证成上迈出关键的一步，不过他仍然没有摆脱传统认识论的框架；在精神科学的自我确证之路上，伽达默尔接力前行，其哲学诠释学证明了精神科学与理解的本质关系，确立理解的对话结构和精神科学的问答逻辑，由于这种逻辑主要局限于存在论/本体论层面的描述，故而隐含着认识论和实践价值上的相对主义危机。应在更高层面上展望一种存在论和认识论—方法论相统一的精神科学的对话逻辑，这种逻辑融合交互性、反思批判性、开放性和伦理性等元素于自身，不仅标识出精神科学的特质，也能为不同学科领域的交叉综合与创新提供助益。
- 诗性逻辑 /
- 精神科学 /
- 体验 /
- 理解 /
- 对话逻辑
Abstract: With the development of modern natural sciences and the comedown of traditional humanities, the foundation of Geisteswissenschaften was put on the agenda. Whether the Geisteswissenschaften / human sciences have their own logic or methodology, has been a crucial philosophical issue since the second half of the 19th century and is still of great concern in the contemporary academic context. Vico was the first to lay a foundation for human sciences by elucidating the legitimacy of humanistic knowledge in terms of the poetic logic; nevertheless, he confused “genesis” with “validity”. Dilthey developed methodologies of descriptive psychology and hermeneutics further, which was a critical step in founding and justifying Geisteswissenschaften, but he was still confined to the traditional epistemology. The intrinsic connection between understanding and Geisteswissenschaften wasn’t revealed until Gadamer demonstrated in his philosophical hermeneutics the dialogue-structure of understanding and the “logic of question and answer” of the Geisteswissenschaften. In this logic, however, a kind of epistemological and practical relativism could arise in that it is mainly restricted to the ontological description. This paper, through investigating the historical development and the logical foundation of modern human sciences / Geisteswissenschaften, aims to propose a “dialogic” in which the ontological and epistemological-methodological dimensions are interconnected on a higher level. This kind of dialogic, while integrating such elements as interactivity, critical reflection, openness and ethicality, could not only constitute the key characteristic of the Geisteswissenschaften but also facilitate comprehensive cross-subject research.
- poetic logic /
- Geisteswissenschaften /
- Erleben /
- understanding /
- dialogic
1. [1]
  颜翔林 . 审美体验及其性质与对象. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(7): 150-158.
2. [2]
  张庆熊 . 公共诠释的社会功能与带有批判维度的主体际交往方式. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(11): 24-30.
3. [3]
  张留华 . 论“逻辑分析”. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(3): 26-38.
4. [4]
  蔡纪风 . 同光之际的西礼知识、体验与译介. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(4): 197-209.
5. [5]
  郑彧 . 商法思维的逻辑基础. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(06): 85-92.
6. [6]
  刘守英 , 汪广龙 . 中国奇迹的政治经济逻辑. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(1): 48-62.
7. [7]
  盛明科 , 刘勇 . 基层治理疲态的生成逻辑. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(4): 114-126.
8. [8]
  张留华 . 推理主义：逻辑与意义理论. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(5): 28-38.
9. [9]
  刘志阳 , 王陆峰 . 中国社会企业的生成逻辑. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(10): 82-91.
10. [10]
  贺雪峰 , 桂华 . 行政激励与乡村治理的逻辑. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(7): 126-137.
11. [11]
  程乐松 . 从书写理解差异. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(12): 24-32.
12. [12]
  刘亮沈桂龙 . “共享经济”与公共政策融合的内在逻辑. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(04): 86-97.
13. [13]
  苏剑 . 语言扶贫的理论逻辑、经验支持与实现路径. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(9): 67-73.
14. [14]
  陈金钊 . 返回拟制探寻法思维的逻辑起点. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(1): 117-129.
15. [15]
  吴白乙 , 张一飞 . 全球治理困境与国家“再现”的最终逻辑. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(1): 80-92.
16. [16]
  肖存良 . 职责与生成：群众路线的政治逻辑研究. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(2): 97-106.
17. [17]
  乔天宇 , 向静林 . 社会治理数字化转型的底层逻辑. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(2): 131-139.
18. [18]
  刘少杰 . 中国网络社会的交往实践和发展逻辑. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(8): 105-117.
19. [19]
  钟文晶 , 罗必良 . 农民走向共同富裕的资产逻辑. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(11): 38-53.
20. [20]
  刘志阳 , 陈咏昶 . 社会企业混合逻辑与跨部门协同. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(11): 85-98.

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 12
文章访问数: 624
HTML全文浏览量: 72

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

精神科学的逻辑演进

牛文君

作者简介:牛文君，华东师范大学哲学系暨华东师大诠释学研究所副教授（上海 200241）

网络出版日期: 2021-12-20

关键词:

摘要: 随着自然科学革命的推进和传统人文领域的式微，精神科学的奠基逐渐被提上日程。精神科学、人文科学有没有自身的逻辑和方法论？这是19世纪下半叶以来哲学面临的重大问题，并在当今学术语境中依然显示出紧迫性。人文科学最初由维柯奠基，以诗性逻辑阐明人文知识的合法性，却忽略了知识的起源和有效性之区分；狄尔泰通过建构描述心理学和诠释学的方法论，在精神科学的奠基与证成上迈出关键的一步，不过他仍然没有摆脱传统认识论的框架；在精神科学的自我确证之路上，伽达默尔接力前行，其哲学诠释学证明了精神科学与理解的本质关系，确立理解的对话结构和精神科学的问答逻辑，由于这种逻辑主要局限于存在论/本体论层面的描述，故而隐含着认识论和实践价值上的相对主义危机。应在更高层面上展望一种存在论和认识论—方法论相统一的精神科学的对话逻辑，这种逻辑融合交互性、反思批判性、开放性和伦理性等元素于自身，不仅标识出精神科学的特质，也能为不同学科领域的交叉综合与创新提供助益。

English Abstract

The Logical Progression of the Geisteswissenschaften

Wenjun NIU

Available Online: 2021-12-20

Abstract: With the development of modern natural sciences and the comedown of traditional humanities, the foundation of Geisteswissenschaften was put on the agenda. Whether the Geisteswissenschaften / human sciences have their own logic or methodology, has been a crucial philosophical issue since the second half of the 19th century and is still of great concern in the contemporary academic context. Vico was the first to lay a foundation for human sciences by elucidating the legitimacy of humanistic knowledge in terms of the poetic logic; nevertheless, he confused “genesis” with “validity”. Dilthey developed methodologies of descriptive psychology and hermeneutics further, which was a critical step in founding and justifying Geisteswissenschaften, but he was still confined to the traditional epistemology. The intrinsic connection between understanding and Geisteswissenschaften wasn’t revealed until Gadamer demonstrated in his philosophical hermeneutics the dialogue-structure of understanding and the “logic of question and answer” of the Geisteswissenschaften. In this logic, however, a kind of epistemological and practical relativism could arise in that it is mainly restricted to the ontological description. This paper, through investigating the historical development and the logical foundation of modern human sciences / Geisteswissenschaften, aims to propose a “dialogic” in which the ontological and epistemological-methodological dimensions are interconnected on a higher level. This kind of dialogic, while integrating such elements as interactivity, critical reflection, openness and ethicality, could not only constitute the key characteristic of the Geisteswissenschaften but also facilitate comprehensive cross-subject research.

精神科学的逻辑演进—以诠释学为中心

作者简介: 牛文君，华东师范大学哲学系暨华东师大诠释学研究所副教授（上海 200241）;

The Logical Progression of the Geisteswissenschaften

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

精神科学的逻辑演进

作者简介:牛文君，华东师范大学哲学系暨华东师大诠释学研究所副教授（上海 200241）

English Abstract

The Logical Progression of the Geisteswissenschaften

全文HTML

目录

精神科学的逻辑演进—以诠释学为中心

作者简介: 牛文君，华东师范大学哲学系暨华东师大诠释学研究所副教授（上海 200241）;

The Logical Progression of the Geisteswissenschaften

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

精神科学的逻辑演进

作者简介:牛文君，华东师范大学哲学系暨华东师大诠释学研究所副教授（上海 200241）

English Abstract

The Logical Progression of the Geisteswissenschaften

全文HTML

目录