Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 55 Issue 7
July 2023
Article Contents

Citation: XIAO Ying. Family/Home and Social Governance: Values,Methods,Objects and Subjects[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(7): 115-127. shu

Family/Home and Social Governance: Values,Methods,Objects and Subjects

  • In recent years,the redistribution of housing land and the rebuilding of rural houses are important contents of rural social governance in China.Field investigation shows that the practice of relevant social policies at the grassroots level has double consequences: improving the rural living environments and promoting the integration of urban and rural areas on the one hand,and on the other hand,the elderly are forced to leave their homes and families,entering the apartments for the elderly or the nursing homes of different types and levels.However,the nursing homes of different types and levels provide different conditions for the reconstruction of “home” for the elderly,and the more complete the hardware facilities of the nursing homes,the more far away from the expectation of the elderly to “go home”.This kind of experience of the rural elderly leads to the topic of the relationships between family and social governance.The role of family in social governance can be roughly divided into four kinds: source of values,methods,objects and subjects.Social governance should care for family values as much as possible,respect the dominant position of family in governance,avoid the differentiated use of family values and family subjects,and prevent the division of family metaphor in governance philosophy and family as a tool in governance practice.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Liang GUO . The Relationship between Family and State: An Important Local Perspective to Understand the Changes of Social Governance Since Modern China. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 96-105.

    2. [2]

      Shi’e ZHURudai YANGBi WU . New Rural Society Endowment Insurance Program and Household Consumption. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(11): 60-69.

    3. [3]

      Tianyu QIAOJinglin XIANG . The Underlying Logics of Digital Transformation of Social Governance. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(2): 131-139.

    4. [4]

      Shipeng ZOU . Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of State and Law and the Basic Orientation of State Socialization. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(6): 19-30.

    5. [5]

      Jianxing YUJie REN . Self-governance, Rule of Law, Rule of Virtue and Their Combination in Community-level Social Governance. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(12): 64-74.

    6. [6]

      Liangbo LUO . The Technical Framework of National Governance: Spatial Remodeling from Management Engineering to Social Engineering. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 102-117.

    7. [7]

      Zhaowang CHEN . Social Control and State Governance Realized by Welfare State. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 82-94.

    8. [8]

      XIANG Jinglin . Sociological Exploration of Financial Governance:A Multilevel Institutional Analysis Framework. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 131-149.

    9. [9]

      Jianyong FENG . “Diplomatizing” the Border Governance. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(2): 186-198.

    10. [10]

      Xuedong YANGJian YAN . Governance Edging out Representation?. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(3): 59-67.

    11. [11]

      Ping FU . Creating Leading-edge Integrated Governance: The Governance Innovation of Poverty Alleviation in China. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 121-131.

    12. [12]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(10): 66-80.

    13. [13]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(12): 172-173.

    14. [14]

      Mingke SHENGYong LIU . How Burnout of Grassroots Bureaucracy be Generated. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 114-126.

    15. [15]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(07): 88-98.

    16. [16]

      Zhao CHEN . Industrial Policies with Great Power Governance. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 46-57, 82.

    17. [17]

      Xuefeng HEHua GUI . Administrative Incentives and the Logic of Rural Governance. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 126-137.

    18. [18]

      Guozheng CHENQiu ZHU . Dynamic Evolution of Modern Urban Governance Mechanisms Research. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 86-95, 122.

    19. [19]

      Yao CHENTiantian CHEN . How Systems Produce Governance Effciency: 70-Years Experience in China’s National Governance. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(2): 86-94.

    20. [20]

      Huping SHANG . China’s Appeal of “Governance” and the Dilemma of Current Domestic Governance Research. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(5): 72-87.

Article Metrics

Article views: 110 Times PDF downloads: 1 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(1)
  • Abstract views(110)
  • HTML views(18)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Family/Home and Social Governance: Values,Methods,Objects and Subjects

        Abstract: In recent years,the redistribution of housing land and the rebuilding of rural houses are important contents of rural social governance in China.Field investigation shows that the practice of relevant social policies at the grassroots level has double consequences: improving the rural living environments and promoting the integration of urban and rural areas on the one hand,and on the other hand,the elderly are forced to leave their homes and families,entering the apartments for the elderly or the nursing homes of different types and levels.However,the nursing homes of different types and levels provide different conditions for the reconstruction of “home” for the elderly,and the more complete the hardware facilities of the nursing homes,the more far away from the expectation of the elderly to “go home”.This kind of experience of the rural elderly leads to the topic of the relationships between family and social governance.The role of family in social governance can be roughly divided into four kinds: source of values,methods,objects and subjects.Social governance should care for family values as much as possible,respect the dominant position of family in governance,avoid the differentiated use of family values and family subjects,and prevent the division of family metaphor in governance philosophy and family as a tool in governance practice.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return