全球治理困境与国家“再现”的最终逻辑

吴白乙; 张一飞

English

全球治理困境与国家“再现”的最终逻辑

吴白乙 , 张一飞

引用本文: 吴白乙, 张一飞. 全球治理困境与国家“再现”的最终逻辑[J]. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(1): 80-92. shu

Citation: Baiyi WU, Yifei ZHANG. The Logic of State’s Return Phenomenon and the Dilemma of Global Governance[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(1): 80-92. shu

全球治理困境与国家“再现”的最终逻辑

吴白乙 ,
张一飞

作者简介: 吴白乙，中国社会科学院欧洲研究所研究员（北京 100732）;张一飞，中国社会科学院美国研究所助理研究员（北京 100720）;

中图分类号: D0

The Logic of State’s Return Phenomenon and the Dilemma of Global Governance

Baiyi WU ,
Yifei ZHANG

Available Online: 2021-01-20
CLC number: D0

摘要: 在全球治理危机频现和大国战略竞争加剧的背景下，“国家中心主义”回归引发了人们对经济全球化走势的担忧。本轮国家中心主义回归的逻辑是：此前自由主义全球化的过度发展导致国家功能隐退；而当全球治理状况恶化时，国家的重要性再度凸现，成为各国社会谋求自我体系安全的唯一“阀门”，民族主义、保护主义思潮亦大行其道。从中期看，未来的全球体系重建过程将充满国家中心主义与自由主义两种理性的持续角力，国家与市场的作用都将在“拉锯战”相互影响与重塑。从远期看，新型全球化将是国家与市场关系再平衡的产物，国家仍是兼具服务本民族发展及其外部性的主要工具。国家处理内外发展与治理多重挑战的“灵活度”即为评判其核心竞争力的最终标准。
- 国家中心主义 /
- 经济全球化 /
- 全球治理 /
- 国家作用
Abstract: Under the circumstance of frequent global governance crises and intensified power competition, the return of “state-centralism” has aroused people’s anxieties about the reversal momentum of economic globalization. How to reexamine the dual role of the state, either “to embrace the globalization” or “to reinforce the global governance”? The authors attempt to provide an accountable reply to this key question. By reviewing the basic functions of state, the causes of global governance deficits, the paper analyzes two types of “state return” phenomenon and the logics that derive from the market economy itself—the excessive growth of liberalist globalization inevitably weakens state’s monopoly on the one hand; and on the other hand, the role of state becomes central again when globalization has created too many pitfalls that need to be delt with and regulated. In face of global crises, the state is highlighted as the “last valve” for all global citizens to secure their individual survival. Unfortunately, populism and protectionism happen to revive at the same time. In the medium term, the restructuring process of global system will display a contracted state-centric vs. market-centric contest. The forces of state and market will entangle and reshape each other. In the long run, a new-type globalization will not prevail until the relationship between state and market gets to a rebalance. Namely, the state is restored as the main vehicle to advance national development and its external interests. However, it must steadily reform itself to better handle the lasting contradictions between socio-economic developments and effective internal and external governance. In meeting such challenges, the state would have to demonstrate and finally adopt “pragmatic flexibilities” as a neo-crieria of its core competity. In sum, the ‘reemergence of state’ in different periods and to different degrees is an inevitable phenomenon of the history. It must have distinctive dynamics accumulated for profound adjustments and changes. The state should wisely recognize and comply with them, while neither overestimating nor underestimating the limitations of its function.
- state-centralism /
- economy globalization /
- global governance /
- state functions
1. [1]
  戴维来 . 疫情影响下的全球治理：碎片化与中等强国的角色. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(4): 92-103.
2. [2]
  袁志刚 , 郑志伟 , 葛劲峰 . 全球经济增长面临的困境与出路. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(8): 67-82.
3. [3]
  林卡，胡克，周弘 . “全球发展”理念形成的社会基础条件及其演化. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(9): 101-109.
4. [4]
  魏南枝 . 美国的文化认同冲突和社会不平等性. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(2): 85-96.
5. [5]
  张幼文 . 中国四十年开放型发展道路：战略节点与理论内涵. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(9): 44-55.
6. [6]
  丁元竹 . 社会关系模式建构：社区、主权国家与全球化视角. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(7): 66-75.
7. [7]
  程大中 , 汪宁 , 甄洋 . 中国参与RCEP：基础、规则与前景. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(3): 35-49.
8. [8]
  葛劲峰 , 袁志刚 , 樊潇彦 . 理解全球化：基于“经济−社会−政治”体系共生演化视角的分析. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(8): 31-44.
9. [9]
  张幼文 , 吴信坤 . 国际直接投资中的要素流动与全球化经济的资源配置. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(12): 78-89.
10. [10]
  万广华 , 朱美华 . “逆全球化”：特征、起因与前瞻. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(7): 33-47.
11. [11]
  张康之 . 全球化、后工业化时代中的科学研究. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(5): 78-87.
12. [12]
  闻翔 . 艺术市场全球化的社会学叙事：表现、机制与后果. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(8): 118-128.
13. [13]
  周怡 . 厚与薄：全球化与中国传统价值观念. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(10): 120-133.
14. [14]
  庞中英 . 全球治理研究的未来：比较和反思. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(12): 57-67.
15. [15]
  何志鹏 , 申天娇 . 国际软法在全球治理中的效力探究. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(1): 103-116.
16. [16]
  翁士洪 . 跨国行为体和没有政府的全球治理. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(02): 88-96.
17. [17]
  孟于群 , 杨署东 . 国际公共产品供给：加总技术下的制度安排与全球治理. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(01): 96-105.
18. [18]
  易承志 . 协商民主、国家建设与国家治理. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(03): 66-79.
19. [19]
  王鸿铭 . “工作组”模式：国家治理现代化的中国经验. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(3): 85-98.
20. [20]
  韩志明 . 国家治理的信息叙事：清晰性、清晰化与清晰度. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(9): 82-94.

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 19
文章访问数: 1140
HTML全文浏览量: 136

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

全球治理困境与国家“再现”的最终逻辑

作者简介:吴白乙，中国社会科学院欧洲研究所研究员（北京 100732）

作者简介:张一飞，中国社会科学院美国研究所助理研究员（北京 100720）

网络出版日期: 2021-01-20

关键词:

摘要: 在全球治理危机频现和大国战略竞争加剧的背景下，“国家中心主义”回归引发了人们对经济全球化走势的担忧。本轮国家中心主义回归的逻辑是：此前自由主义全球化的过度发展导致国家功能隐退；而当全球治理状况恶化时，国家的重要性再度凸现，成为各国社会谋求自我体系安全的唯一“阀门”，民族主义、保护主义思潮亦大行其道。从中期看，未来的全球体系重建过程将充满国家中心主义与自由主义两种理性的持续角力，国家与市场的作用都将在“拉锯战”相互影响与重塑。从远期看，新型全球化将是国家与市场关系再平衡的产物，国家仍是兼具服务本民族发展及其外部性的主要工具。国家处理内外发展与治理多重挑战的“灵活度”即为评判其核心竞争力的最终标准。

English Abstract

The Logic of State’s Return Phenomenon and the Dilemma of Global Governance

Available Online: 2021-01-20

Abstract: Under the circumstance of frequent global governance crises and intensified power competition, the return of “state-centralism” has aroused people’s anxieties about the reversal momentum of economic globalization. How to reexamine the dual role of the state, either “to embrace the globalization” or “to reinforce the global governance”? The authors attempt to provide an accountable reply to this key question. By reviewing the basic functions of state, the causes of global governance deficits, the paper analyzes two types of “state return” phenomenon and the logics that derive from the market economy itself—the excessive growth of liberalist globalization inevitably weakens state’s monopoly on the one hand; and on the other hand, the role of state becomes central again when globalization has created too many pitfalls that need to be delt with and regulated. In face of global crises, the state is highlighted as the “last valve” for all global citizens to secure their individual survival. Unfortunately, populism and protectionism happen to revive at the same time. In the medium term, the restructuring process of global system will display a contracted state-centric vs. market-centric contest. The forces of state and market will entangle and reshape each other. In the long run, a new-type globalization will not prevail until the relationship between state and market gets to a rebalance. Namely, the state is restored as the main vehicle to advance national development and its external interests. However, it must steadily reform itself to better handle the lasting contradictions between socio-economic developments and effective internal and external governance. In meeting such challenges, the state would have to demonstrate and finally adopt “pragmatic flexibilities” as a neo-crieria of its core competity. In sum, the ‘reemergence of state’ in different periods and to different degrees is an inevitable phenomenon of the history. It must have distinctive dynamics accumulated for profound adjustments and changes. The state should wisely recognize and comply with them, while neither overestimating nor underestimating the limitations of its function.

全球治理困境与国家“再现”的最终逻辑

作者简介: 吴白乙，中国社会科学院欧洲研究所研究员（北京 100732）;张一飞，中国社会科学院美国研究所助理研究员（北京 100720）;

The Logic of State’s Return Phenomenon and the Dilemma of Global Governance

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

全球治理困境与国家“再现”的最终逻辑

作者简介:吴白乙，中国社会科学院欧洲研究所研究员（北京 100732）

作者简介:张一飞，中国社会科学院美国研究所助理研究员（北京 100720）

English Abstract

The Logic of State’s Return Phenomenon and the Dilemma of Global Governance

全文HTML

目录

全球治理困境与国家“再现”的最终逻辑

作者简介: 吴白乙，中国社会科学院欧洲研究所研究员（北京 100732）;张一飞，中国社会科学院美国研究所助理研究员（北京 100720）;

The Logic of State’s Return Phenomenon and the Dilemma of Global Governance

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

全球治理困境与国家“再现”的最终逻辑

作者简介:吴白乙，中国社会科学院欧洲研究所研究员（北京 100732）

作者简介:张一飞，中国社会科学院美国研究所助理研究员（北京 100720）

English Abstract

The Logic of State’s Return Phenomenon and the Dilemma of Global Governance

全文HTML

目录