Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 8
November 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Yong HUANG. Two Aspects of a Good Life in Virtue Ethics: With a Focus on the Confucian View on Rightness and Benefits[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 5-15. shu

Two Aspects of a Good Life in Virtue Ethics: With a Focus on the Confucian View on Rightness and Benefits

  • There has been a long lasting debates on the proper relationship between moral rightness and external benefits among different Chinese philosophical schools. It’s a consensus that Confucianism gives priority to rightness over benefits. There is disagreement, however, on whether this is because Confucianism regards rightness as an intrinsic value independent of, even though not necessarily in conflict with, benefits or because it sees rightness as the best instrument to produce benefits. The former takes Confucianism as a deontological theory, while the latter a consequentialist or even utilitarian one. In contrast, this essay argues that it is a virtue ethical theory, concerned with a good or flourishing human life, consisting of both external wellbeing and internal wellbeing. While benefits are indispensable to the former, rightness the latter. Although these two aspects, each of which has its own intrinsic value, are mutually instrumental, conflicts between the two may arise, and when they do, Confucianism puts rightness ahead of benefits, as it is what makes human life different from other forms of life.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Zhirong Zhu . On the View of Imagery in Zhouyi. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 124-1.

    2. [2]

      ZHANG Huiyong . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(6): 22-31.

    3. [3]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(05): 116-127.

    4. [4]

      Xiaochao WANG . On the Formation and Theoretical Construction of Good and Evil Theory in Ancient Greece and Rome. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(11): 5-12.

    5. [5]

      Jianxun JI . A General Survey of the Methodology of Chinese Comparative Literature. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(10): 140-149.

    6. [6]

      Liuhua ZHANG . On the Very Idea of Logical Analysis. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(3): 26-38.

    7. [7]

      Liwen ZHANG . On the Same Source of Fundamental Structure and Practical Use. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(4): 5-22, 34.

    8. [8]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(11): 89-127.

    9. [9]

      Zhang Shufang . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(5): 88-100.

    10. [10]

      Xuguang LIU . On Ethereality of Aesthetic. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 149-160.

    11. [11]

      YAO Dazhi . On the Base of Rights. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(9): 5-13.

    12. [12]

      WANG Xiaochao . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(6): 15-21.

    13. [13]

      . On the Irrationality of False Pretence. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(04): 21-32.

    14. [14]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(04): 28-41.

    15. [15]

      Gang XIAN . Schelling on the Origin and Nature of Mythology. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 18-26.

    16. [16]

      XIE Changqing . On the Priority of Rawls’ Liberty. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(1): 92-101.

    17. [17]

      YU Zhenhua . On the Pragmatic Turn in Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(12): 5-15.

    18. [18]

      WEI Zhijiang . Study on the World Order of the Liao Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(12): 160-172.

    19. [19]

      WU Zhen . Wang Chuanshan’s Theory of Li and Qi. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(1): 11-23.

    20. [20]

      Lin YUE . The Social Genetation Mechanism of Privacy. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 104-116.

Article Metrics

Article views: 364 Times PDF downloads: 5 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(5)
  • Abstract views(364)
  • HTML views(78)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Two Aspects of a Good Life in Virtue Ethics: With a Focus on the Confucian View on Rightness and Benefits

        Abstract: There has been a long lasting debates on the proper relationship between moral rightness and external benefits among different Chinese philosophical schools. It’s a consensus that Confucianism gives priority to rightness over benefits. There is disagreement, however, on whether this is because Confucianism regards rightness as an intrinsic value independent of, even though not necessarily in conflict with, benefits or because it sees rightness as the best instrument to produce benefits. The former takes Confucianism as a deontological theory, while the latter a consequentialist or even utilitarian one. In contrast, this essay argues that it is a virtue ethical theory, concerned with a good or flourishing human life, consisting of both external wellbeing and internal wellbeing. While benefits are indispensable to the former, rightness the latter. Although these two aspects, each of which has its own intrinsic value, are mutually instrumental, conflicts between the two may arise, and when they do, Confucianism puts rightness ahead of benefits, as it is what makes human life different from other forms of life.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return