Citation:
Yajun CHEN. How the Myth of the Given is Collapsed by Pittsburgh School[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 20-30.
How the Myth of the Given is Collapsed by Pittsburgh School
-
Abstract
Pittsburgh School’s deconstruction of the myth of the given is composed of the three successive steps: Sellars starts the work by demarcation of the natural and rational spaces, but he finally dosen’t give up the given completely, due to his standpoint of scientifical realism. McDowell goes forward in Sellars direction by replacing nonconceptual sense-multifold with the conceptual experience, which forms the final court of knowledge. But he has always been keeping an empathy to the appeal of the given. Comparing with them, Brandom is more radical in destroying the myth of the given. He completely abandons the thinking way of empiricism, not looking forward the constraint of the knowledge from the world, but from the language peers instead. He calls himself a rational pragmatist, however, since his practice is only in the sense of the discursive one, not the interaction between lives and their environments, which makes him unable to account for the source of the norms.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
Yi JIANG
. Wittgenstein and Pragmatism. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(11): 5-15.
-
[2]
Yajun CHEN
. Normativity, Inference, Communication, and World. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(5): 5-14.
-
[3]
Guoyi WU
. A Historical Investigation on the Spread of the Name and Concept of the Silk Road. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(5): 145-167, 184.
-
[4]
TANG Zhesheng
. . Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(9): 131-139.
-
[5]
Jinhua CHENG
. Normalization of Facts in the Legal System. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(3): 114-124.
-
[6]
Yinxing HONG
. Capital in Socialist Market Economy: Attributes, Acts, and Norms. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(5): 39-45.
-
[7]
Guiliang WEN
. The Practice of Literary Chinese and the Emergence of Modern Chinese Literature. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(12): 139-150.
-
[8]
Jianping GAO
. A Reflection on the Theory of “Sedimentation” and a Reinterpretation of “New Sensuousness”. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(3): 183-192.
-
[9]
Jing ZHOU
. The Impact of Wittgenstein’s Philosophy on the Development of Pragmatism. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(12): 24-33.
-
[10]
Liangkang NI
. “ Transzendental”: The meaning and Reconsideration of Its Chinese Translation. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(4): 5-13.
-
[11]
Guorong YANG
. Human Knowing: An Understanding in Broad Sense. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(3): 15-25.
-
[12]
Feng YU
. Nonconceptualism of Experiential Content Revisited. Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(12): 17-24.
-
[13]
Meng HOU
. Paradigm of Empirical Legal Research: Compared with Normative Legal Research. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(3): 99-105.
-
[14]
. . Academic Monthly,
2016, 48(11): 49-56.
-
[15]
Lai HE
. From “Universality of Concept” to “Universality of Practice”. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(9): 5-13.
-
[16]
Qinghua CAO
. Jianghu Imagination and Power Practice. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(9): 143-151, 184.
-
[17]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(3): 179-184.
-
[18]
Xuequan PANG
. Reconstruction of the Daily Life Experience World. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(1): 23-34.
-
[19]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(12): 202-211.
-
[20]
YU Zhenhua
. On the Pragmatic Turn in Philosophy. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(12): 5-15.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: