Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 52 Issue 6
June 2020
Article Contents

Citation: Youmei LI and Jing GENG. The Paradigm of Knowledge Production in Chinese Sociology[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(6): 5-16. shu

The Paradigm of Knowledge Production in Chinese Sociology

  • The rural construction movement in the first half of the 20th century is not only a movement for reconstructing society, but also a movement of knowledge production in modern Chinese society. In this movement, the paradigms of Yan Yangchu’s “creative adaptation” and Fei Xiaotong’s “seeking knowledge from reality” are both based on self cultural foundation and different interest in their research, supporting different ways of asserting and understanding Chinese society and, at the same time, proposing different possibilities for the dimensions of reconstructing Chinese society. As the academic heritage of Chinese sociology, these two paradigms of knowledge production provide important revelation for today’s construction of the knowledge system of Chinese sociology by their praxis logic and comparative analysis.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Leizhen ZANGYifei ZHU . Process and Context: A Social Science Causal Approach. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 33-44.

    2. [2]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(8): 5-15.

    3. [3]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(08): 16-31.

    4. [4]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(8): 27-36.

    5. [5]

      Mingming WANG . Association, Comparison and Reconsideration: Fei Xiaotong’s Thesis of “Heaven-Man Unity” and the Anthropological “Ontological Turn”. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(8): 143-167, 178.

    6. [6]

      FAN Xiaoguang . The Consciousness of Indigenization and Knowledge Production in Chinese Sociologists. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(1): 115-126.

    7. [7]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 59-72.

    8. [8]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(07): 111-119.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 73-83.

    10. [10]

      Meng HOU . Paradigm of Empirical Legal Research: Compared with Normative Legal Research. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 99-105.

    11. [11]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 38-48.

    12. [12]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(06): 83-98.

    13. [13]

      Peiguo ZHANG . Rethinking on the Paradigm of “Capitalist Germination”. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 168-181.

    14. [14]

      Dongling LIU . New Human Beings’ Born: On the Construction of Yan’an Literature Paradigm. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(10): 144-155.

    15. [15]

      Wenfang YAO . The Representation of Social Integrity: The Productbility of Kahler’s “Theory”. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(11): 142-149.

    16. [16]

      Bo XU . Perfect Teaching: The Paradigmatic Transformation and Its Significance of Mou Zongsan Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 26-34.

    17. [17]

      Ye’an ZHOUHaiyan ZHANG . The Evolution of Behavioral Economics over Half a Century: The Historical Trajectory of Paradigm Shift. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 91-99.

    18. [18]

      LI Youmei . New Public Nature and Paradigm Innovation of Theory of Chinese Society Transformation. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(2): 5-20.

    19. [19]

      YANG Yichun . The Confucian Cultural Paradigm—— Quantitative Research of Cross-cultural Comparison between China and U.S.. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(3): 143-154.

    20. [20]

      Xiaoyi ZHANGHuaiyu LIU . Metro-Marxism as a Paradigm of Urban Research. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(3): 34-42, 33.

Article Metrics

Article views: 1736 Times PDF downloads: 21 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(21)
  • Abstract views(1736)
  • HTML views(351)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        The Paradigm of Knowledge Production in Chinese Sociology

        Abstract: The rural construction movement in the first half of the 20th century is not only a movement for reconstructing society, but also a movement of knowledge production in modern Chinese society. In this movement, the paradigms of Yan Yangchu’s “creative adaptation” and Fei Xiaotong’s “seeking knowledge from reality” are both based on self cultural foundation and different interest in their research, supporting different ways of asserting and understanding Chinese society and, at the same time, proposing different possibilities for the dimensions of reconstructing Chinese society. As the academic heritage of Chinese sociology, these two paradigms of knowledge production provide important revelation for today’s construction of the knowledge system of Chinese sociology by their praxis logic and comparative analysis.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return