从“权力主导”到“权利本位”：刑事在线诉讼的法治悖反与归位

吴思远

English

引用本文: 吴思远. 从“权力主导”到“权利本位”：刑事在线诉讼的法治悖反与归位[J]. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(2): 124-135. shu

Citation: WU Siyuan. From “Power Orientation” to “Right Standard”:Contravention and Return of Rule of Law in Criminal Online Litigation[J]. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(2): 124-135. shu

从“权力主导”到“权利本位”：刑事在线诉讼的法治悖反与归位

吴思远

作者简介: 吴思远，华东政法大学刑事法学院、涉外法治研究院副教授（上海200042）。;

中图分类号: D925.2

From “Power Orientation” to “Right Standard”:Contravention and Return of Rule of Law in Criminal Online Litigation

WU Siyuan

CLC number: D925.2

摘要: 随着数字技术在诉讼活动中的广泛运用，诉讼活动的技术化特征日益凸显，这加深了在线诉讼治理的复杂程度。刑事诉讼无法自外于数字化的浪潮，长期渐进与短期突变共同构成某种程度上的间断平衡，表明刑事在线诉讼不仅由稳定和渐进主义逻辑所驱动，也因偶然性因素而变迁。由此引发了一系列潜在的法治风险，背离了现代法治所追求的限制公权、保障权利的基本要义。后疫情时代应当归位法治，坚持合法性思维与体系性建构，纠偏刑事在线诉讼中粗放、弹性的制度安排。通过法治思维的引领，将刑事在线诉讼发展的方向及时转换到规则论证与程序设计上，以此实现对人权的尊重与关照，保障“建设数字中国”的改革红利能够更为均衡、广泛地惠及至全国各个地区的人民群众。一方面，应当正视法律作为复杂演化系统所兼具的渐进性与偶然性，提升改革者的理性与智识，主动强化刑事在线诉讼中的权利保障，并以此为主轴为立法与改革提供方向指引与制度性框架；另一方面，应当充分尊重刑事在线诉讼发展的底层逻辑，遵循渐进调适的路径，分解改革目标并依次实施、验证、调整乃至改进，逐步适应诉讼数字化的发展趋势。
- 数字时代｜在线诉讼｜刑事在线诉讼｜间断平衡法治
Abstract: With the widespread application of digital technology in litigation activities,the technical characteristics of litigation activities have become increasingly prominent,but it has also exacerbated the complexity of online litigation governance.Criminal proceedings cannot be separated from the wave of digitalization,and the discontinuous balance between long-term gradual and short-term mutations shows that criminal online litigation is not only driven by the logic of stability and gradualism,but also by the factors of contingency.This has led to a series of potential rule of law risks,deviating from the basic principles of modern rule of law that restricts public power and safeguards rights.In the post-epidemic era,the rule of law should be restored,adhering to legality thinking and systemic construction,correcting the excessive and flexible institutional arrangements of criminal online litigation.Through the guidance of the rule of law thinking,the direction of the development of criminal online litigation will be shifted to rule demonstration and procedural design in a timely manner,so as to realize the care of human rights and ensure that the reform dividend of “building a digital China” can benefit the people in all regions of the country in a more balanced and extensive manner.On the one hand,we should recognize the gradual and accidental nature of law as a complex evolving system,enhance the rationality and wisdom of reformers,actively strengthen rights protection in criminal online litigation,and use this as the main axis to provide direction and institutional framework for legislation and reform; on the other hand,we should fully respect the underlying logic of the development of criminal online litigation,follow the gradual adjustive path,decompose reform goals and implement,verify,adjust,and improve them in sequence,gradually adapting to the development trend of digital litigation.
- digital age,online litigation,criminal online litigation,punctuated equilibrium,rule of law
1. [1]
  刘志强 . 人权司法保障对新行政诉讼法完善的规制. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(12): 95-101.
2. [2]
  赖骏楠 . 清代四川州县的契税治理：以南部县契税诉讼为侧重点. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(10): 100-115.
3. [3]
  林华，金麟 . 城市更新的法治逻辑：利益平衡与程序构造. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(5): 94-105.
4. [4]
  赵静蓉 . 数字时代我们如何见证. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(3): 155-164.
5. [5]
  温海清 . 再论数字7在蒙元时代的呈现及其象征意义. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(2): 195-205.
6. [6]
  何启志，彭明生 . 数字时代的有为政府：公共治理的视角. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(3): 96-106.
7. [7]
  杨菊华 . 长老权力与时势权力的消长：数字时代的代际关系. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(11): 121-133.
8. [8]
  武飞 . 论经验法则在刑事司法裁判中的论证. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(11): 99-110.
9. [9]
  莫湘益 . 检察建议用于刑事个案监督论要. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(03): 80-89.
10. [10]
  周保欣 . 重建史料与理论研究的新平衡. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(10): 13-16.
11. [11]
  王启梁 . 法治的社会基础. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(10): 110-120.
12. [12]
  孙万怀 . 一种“甜蜜的错觉”：自由意志是刑事责任的基础. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(8): 106-122.
13. [13]
  吕铁 , 李载驰 . 中小制造企业数字化转型. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(10): 59-69.
14. [14]
  马丝妮 , 包刚升 . “平衡抗疫”：前奥密克戎时期的新冠疫情防控研究. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(4): 78-99.
15. [15]
  陈怡俊 . 身份转换策略与社会规范的动态平衡. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(08): 30-41.
16. [16]
  陈水生 . 中国城市公共空间生产的三重逻辑及其平衡. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(5): 101-110.
17. [17]
  汪正龙 . 图像时代的文学变异. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(10): 132-138.
18. [18]
  何玉长 , 王伟 . 数字生产力的性质与应用. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(7): 55-66.
19. [19]
  乔天宇 , 向静林 . 社会治理数字化转型的底层逻辑. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(2): 131-139.
20. [20]
  蒋德海 . 内部行政行为不应长期排斥在法治之外. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(12): 86-94.

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 2
文章访问数: 59
HTML全文浏览量: 18

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

从“权力主导”到“权利本位”：刑事在线诉讼的法治悖反与归位

吴思远

作者简介:吴思远，华东政法大学刑事法学院、涉外法治研究院副教授（上海200042）。

关键词:

数字时代｜在线诉讼｜刑事在线诉讼｜间断平衡法治

摘要: 随着数字技术在诉讼活动中的广泛运用，诉讼活动的技术化特征日益凸显，这加深了在线诉讼治理的复杂程度。刑事诉讼无法自外于数字化的浪潮，长期渐进与短期突变共同构成某种程度上的间断平衡，表明刑事在线诉讼不仅由稳定和渐进主义逻辑所驱动，也因偶然性因素而变迁。由此引发了一系列潜在的法治风险，背离了现代法治所追求的限制公权、保障权利的基本要义。后疫情时代应当归位法治，坚持合法性思维与体系性建构，纠偏刑事在线诉讼中粗放、弹性的制度安排。通过法治思维的引领，将刑事在线诉讼发展的方向及时转换到规则论证与程序设计上，以此实现对人权的尊重与关照，保障“建设数字中国”的改革红利能够更为均衡、广泛地惠及至全国各个地区的人民群众。一方面，应当正视法律作为复杂演化系统所兼具的渐进性与偶然性，提升改革者的理性与智识，主动强化刑事在线诉讼中的权利保障，并以此为主轴为立法与改革提供方向指引与制度性框架；另一方面，应当充分尊重刑事在线诉讼发展的底层逻辑，遵循渐进调适的路径，分解改革目标并依次实施、验证、调整乃至改进，逐步适应诉讼数字化的发展趋势。

English Abstract

From “Power Orientation” to “Right Standard”:Contravention and Return of Rule of Law in Criminal Online Litigation

WU Siyuan

Abstract: With the widespread application of digital technology in litigation activities,the technical characteristics of litigation activities have become increasingly prominent,but it has also exacerbated the complexity of online litigation governance.Criminal proceedings cannot be separated from the wave of digitalization,and the discontinuous balance between long-term gradual and short-term mutations shows that criminal online litigation is not only driven by the logic of stability and gradualism,but also by the factors of contingency.This has led to a series of potential rule of law risks,deviating from the basic principles of modern rule of law that restricts public power and safeguards rights.In the post-epidemic era,the rule of law should be restored,adhering to legality thinking and systemic construction,correcting the excessive and flexible institutional arrangements of criminal online litigation.Through the guidance of the rule of law thinking,the direction of the development of criminal online litigation will be shifted to rule demonstration and procedural design in a timely manner,so as to realize the care of human rights and ensure that the reform dividend of “building a digital China” can benefit the people in all regions of the country in a more balanced and extensive manner.On the one hand,we should recognize the gradual and accidental nature of law as a complex evolving system,enhance the rationality and wisdom of reformers,actively strengthen rights protection in criminal online litigation,and use this as the main axis to provide direction and institutional framework for legislation and reform; on the other hand,we should fully respect the underlying logic of the development of criminal online litigation,follow the gradual adjustive path,decompose reform goals and implement,verify,adjust,and improve them in sequence,gradually adapting to the development trend of digital litigation.

从“权力主导”到“权利本位”：刑事在线诉讼的法治悖反与归位

作者简介: 吴思远，华东政法大学刑事法学院、涉外法治研究院副教授（上海200042）。;

From “Power Orientation” to “Right Standard”:Contravention and Return of Rule of Law in Criminal Online Litigation

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

从“权力主导”到“权利本位”：刑事在线诉讼的法治悖反与归位

作者简介:吴思远，华东政法大学刑事法学院、涉外法治研究院副教授（上海200042）。

English Abstract

From “Power Orientation” to “Right Standard”:Contravention and Return of Rule of Law in Criminal Online Litigation

全文HTML

目录

从“权力主导”到“权利本位”：刑事在线诉讼的法治悖反与归位

作者简介: 吴思远，华东政法大学刑事法学院、涉外法治研究院副教授（上海200042）。;

From “Power Orientation” to “Right Standard”:Contravention and Return of Rule of Law in Criminal Online Litigation

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

从“权力主导”到“权利本位”：刑事在线诉讼的法治悖反与归位

作者简介:吴思远，华东政法大学刑事法学院、涉外法治研究院副教授（上海200042）。

English Abstract

From “Power Orientation” to “Right Standard”:Contravention and Return of Rule of Law in Criminal Online Litigation

全文HTML

目录