“美利坚和平”

殷之光

English

“美利坚和平”

殷之光

引用本文: 殷之光. “美利坚和平”[J]. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(4): 84-97, 44. shu

Citation: Zhiguang YIN. Pax Americana[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(4): 84-97, 44. shu

“美利坚和平”—作为帝国主义话语的新自由主义及其全球化神话构成的历史考察

殷之光

作者简介: 殷之光，英国艾克赛特大学人文学院/中国中心副教授;

中图分类号: D0

Pax Americana

Zhiguang YIN

Available Online: 2020-04-01
CLC number: D0

摘要: 自20世纪末起，一批美国保守主义政治与国际关系学者便开始着力描述一个“新美国世纪”的诞生。在21世纪的头十年中，这种胜利主义的霸权叙述更开始着力讲述一个“美利坚和平”的全球秩序想象。这一“美利坚和平”对新自由主义全球化秩序强烈推崇。这种秩序观强调，自由主义经济是调配全球资源、组织经济生活、管理企业的最有效模式；并且，自由资本主导的市场化全球扩张是人类未来全球化进程的唯一路径。近些年，中文学界出现了大量从政治经济学及政治学角度出发对新自由主义全球秩序观的批判。本文强调，从历史维度出发，重新理解过去20年间右翼新自由主义、新保守主义者的帝国观，有助于我们深入理解今天“美利坚和平”秩序观的历史起源及其“新自由主义全球化”叙述的逻辑困境。
- 新自由主义 /
- 英帝国 /
- 美帝国 /
- 美利坚和平 /
- 霸权
Abstract: At the turn of the 20th and the 21st centuries, a growing number of American conservative scholars of political science and international relations began to devote their attentions to depict the emergence of a “New American Century”. In the first decade of the 21st century, this triumphalist attitude drove many conservative elites to narrate the making and consolidation of a global Pax Americana. Pax Americana advocates s neo-liberal global order. It argues that liberalism is the most efficient and effective model of global economic development. It also paints the picture that a capital-driven, liberal market expansion being the only viable path for the future development of globalisation. In recent years, Chinese scholarship of political economy and political science has offered criticisms to this neoliberal world order. This paper hopes to introduce a historical dimension to the discussion. It looks at the political narratives of a Pax Americana in the longue durée since the late 19th century, hoping to present its connection with the historiography and problematics of the narratives of British imperial history. This paper points out that the theoretical interests in the UK and the USA in the late 19th and late 20th centuries respectively have manifested a shared enthusiasm in the reinvention of history. They emerged at times when the politics of British and American imperialisms reached their peaks in their own respective periods. By revealing this historical dimension in the neoliberal and neoconservative imperialist narratives will help us to better understand the origin of Pax Americana and the logic dilemma of its neoliberal globalisation narratives.
- neoliberalism /
- British Empire /
- American Empire /
- Pax Americana /
- hegemony
1. [1]
  贾文娟 . 劳动的身体，资本的心智——自我资本化与新自由主义晚期劳动者意识形态的形成. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(12): 112-121.
2. [2]
  姚大志 . 自由主义的自由观：分析与重构. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(3): 26-33.
3. [3]
  周金泰 . 从上林苑到《上林赋》：汉帝国的博物空间及其笔端营造. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(10): 182-193.
4. [4]
  孔元 . 帝国−封建和主权国家的知识转型：以欧洲法学史为中心的考察. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(3): 96-106.
5. [5]
  王银宏 . 　从“政治共识”到“共识政治”：神圣罗马帝国《选举让步协议》的制度意涵及其宪法意义. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(5): 102-111.
6. [6]
  张一飞，吴白乙 . 战略思维流变与美国霸权走势相关性分析. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(3): 84-95.
7. [7]
  郑彬彬 . 英驻华使领馆翻译官培养与远东情报网构建（1842—1884）. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(1): 194-207.
8. [8]
  张明军 . 工具理性与自由政治浪漫主义形态. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(12): 85-95.
9. [9]
  游欢孙 . 从景祐宫到振英祠：明清宿松石氏祖先故事的创造与演变. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(3): 162-170, 184.
10. [10]
  刘旭光 . 自由游戏−自由愉悦. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(6): 122-134.
11. [11]
  谢常青，张今杰 . 论罗尔斯自由的优先性. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(1): 92-101.
12. [12]
  韩水法 . 自由的四个层面. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(9): 5-17.
13. [13]
  陈伟 . 托克维尔的自由概念. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(04): 84-90.
14. [14]
  应奇 . 再论第三种自由概念. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(8): 46-55.
15. [15]
  高瑞泉 . 隐显之间：心学历程中的“自由意志”. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(11): 5-16.
16. [16]
  魏屹东 , 武胜国 . “自由意志问题”的语境同一论解答. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(11): 18-27.
17. [17]
  徐会平 . 中国宪法学言论自由观反思. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(04): 91-101.
18. [18]
  段德敏 . 托克维尔论自由与权威. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(10): 91-98.
19. [19]
  南星 . 人工智能体有自由意志吗. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(1): 35-47.
20. [20]
  梅剑华 . 奠基物理主义. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(02): 54-63.

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 10
文章访问数: 1707
HTML全文浏览量: 361

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

“美利坚和平”

殷之光

作者简介:殷之光，英国艾克赛特大学人文学院/中国中心副教授

网络出版日期: 2020-04-01

关键词:

摘要: 自20世纪末起，一批美国保守主义政治与国际关系学者便开始着力描述一个“新美国世纪”的诞生。在21世纪的头十年中，这种胜利主义的霸权叙述更开始着力讲述一个“美利坚和平”的全球秩序想象。这一“美利坚和平”对新自由主义全球化秩序强烈推崇。这种秩序观强调，自由主义经济是调配全球资源、组织经济生活、管理企业的最有效模式；并且，自由资本主导的市场化全球扩张是人类未来全球化进程的唯一路径。近些年，中文学界出现了大量从政治经济学及政治学角度出发对新自由主义全球秩序观的批判。本文强调，从历史维度出发，重新理解过去20年间右翼新自由主义、新保守主义者的帝国观，有助于我们深入理解今天“美利坚和平”秩序观的历史起源及其“新自由主义全球化”叙述的逻辑困境。

English Abstract

Pax Americana

Zhiguang YIN

Available Online: 2020-04-01

Abstract: At the turn of the 20th and the 21st centuries, a growing number of American conservative scholars of political science and international relations began to devote their attentions to depict the emergence of a “New American Century”. In the first decade of the 21st century, this triumphalist attitude drove many conservative elites to narrate the making and consolidation of a global Pax Americana. Pax Americana advocates s neo-liberal global order. It argues that liberalism is the most efficient and effective model of global economic development. It also paints the picture that a capital-driven, liberal market expansion being the only viable path for the future development of globalisation. In recent years, Chinese scholarship of political economy and political science has offered criticisms to this neoliberal world order. This paper hopes to introduce a historical dimension to the discussion. It looks at the political narratives of a Pax Americana in the longue durée since the late 19th century, hoping to present its connection with the historiography and problematics of the narratives of British imperial history. This paper points out that the theoretical interests in the UK and the USA in the late 19th and late 20th centuries respectively have manifested a shared enthusiasm in the reinvention of history. They emerged at times when the politics of British and American imperialisms reached their peaks in their own respective periods. By revealing this historical dimension in the neoliberal and neoconservative imperialist narratives will help us to better understand the origin of Pax Americana and the logic dilemma of its neoliberal globalisation narratives.

“美利坚和平”—作为帝国主义话语的新自由主义及其全球化神话构成的历史考察

作者简介: 殷之光，英国艾克赛特大学人文学院/中国中心副教授;

Pax Americana

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

“美利坚和平”

作者简介:殷之光，英国艾克赛特大学人文学院/中国中心副教授

English Abstract

Pax Americana

全文HTML

目录

“美利坚和平”—作为帝国主义话语的新自由主义及其全球化神话构成的历史考察

作者简介: 殷之光，英国艾克赛特大学人文学院/中国中心副教授;

Pax Americana

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

“美利坚和平”

作者简介:殷之光，英国艾克赛特大学人文学院/中国中心副教授

English Abstract

Pax Americana

全文HTML

目录