Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 11
January 2023
Article Contents

Citation: Xiaoling SUN. Moral Disagreements and Constructivism’s Conception of Practical Reason[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(11): 30-37, 83. shu

Moral Disagreements and Constructivism’s Conception of Practical Reason

  • This essay links the constructivism theory of Rawls in the early and late period, namely his Kantian constructivism and political constructivism. By procedurally demonstrating practical reason’s ability to construct and justify moral principles, Rawlsian constructivism successfully vindicates a Kantian conception of practical reason without resorting to controversial metaphysical presuppositions. It also provides a rational framework for reflection and dialogue that achieves moral agreement, or reduces destructive moral disagreements. Rawls’ constructivism is a theory that seeks a moral solution on the basis of recognizing the fact of moral disagreement. On the one hand, this theory insists on the practicality of reason, and on the other hand, it shows a moderate openness.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Rongyu WANG . Institutionalism of Law Revisited: The Distinction between Old and New and the Analysis of Similarities and Differences. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 110-122.

    2. [2]

      Siyou GE . On the Vacillations of Public Justification. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(7): 14-23.

    3. [3]

      GAO Like . Mirror of Society and Transcendental Reason: Comparison of Moral Philosophies between Smith and Kant. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 26-35.

    4. [4]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(05): 31-39.

    5. [5]

      Mingjun ZHANG . Instrumental Rationality and the Form of Liberal Political Romanticism. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 85-95.

    6. [6]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(03): 40-47.

    7. [7]

      Xuan SHI . Rationalist Theory of Happiness: The Core Elements of Descartes’ Ethics and Its Influence. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 35-42.

    8. [8]

      Li LI . Imaginative Rationality. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 150-159.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(08): 18-29.

    10. [10]

      ZHANG Huiyong . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(6): 22-31.

    11. [11]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(03): 157-164.

    12. [12]

      Song YANG . The Sources of Moral Motivation. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(7): 24-32.

    13. [13]

      Jieyu ZHANG . Ways of Making A Day and Choosing A Life: The Metaphor for Brothers and the Conflicting Outlooks on Life in Regret for the Past. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(11): 120-128.

    14. [14]

      . On the Irrationality of False Pretence. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(04): 21-32.

    15. [15]

      Haibo SUN . Reflections on Moral Legislation from the Perspective of Legal Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 106-119.

    16. [16]

      Dehai JIANG . On Social Justice as a Moral Foundation. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(12): 81-92.

    17. [17]

      Jitong LIU . The Social Construction of “Social Welfare Consensus” in China and the Goal of Modern Socialist Welfare State. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 73-84.

    18. [18]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(05): 34-45.

    19. [19]

      Qinghua CAOJianghu Imagination and Power Practice. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(9): 143-151, 184.

    20. [20]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(07): 66-78.

Article Metrics

Article views: 333 Times PDF downloads: 1 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(1)
  • Abstract views(333)
  • HTML views(59)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Moral Disagreements and Constructivism’s Conception of Practical Reason

        Abstract: This essay links the constructivism theory of Rawls in the early and late period, namely his Kantian constructivism and political constructivism. By procedurally demonstrating practical reason’s ability to construct and justify moral principles, Rawlsian constructivism successfully vindicates a Kantian conception of practical reason without resorting to controversial metaphysical presuppositions. It also provides a rational framework for reflection and dialogue that achieves moral agreement, or reduces destructive moral disagreements. Rawls’ constructivism is a theory that seeks a moral solution on the basis of recognizing the fact of moral disagreement. On the one hand, this theory insists on the practicality of reason, and on the other hand, it shows a moderate openness.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return