从书写理解差异

程乐松

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

Volume 51 Issue 12

January 2020

Article Contents

Citation: Lesong CHENG. To Understand Difference from Writing Mode[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 24-32. shu

To Understand Difference from Writing Mode

Lesong CHENG

Abstract

In what sense could one attribute the specialty of Chinese philosophy to the particularities of Chinese as a language? How should one clarify or elaborate the particularities of Chinese? We attempt to demonstrate, we could not agree with either the linguistic determinism in the comparative research with an intercultural context, or interpretation on the specialty of Chinese philosophy through the fragmental analysis. The comparative linguistic analysis framework applied in the intercultural philosophical comparation is not impeccable, for its theoretical source from the Western academia and not tolerant to the mode of philosophical construction. Writing manifests the semantic mode of Chinese characters and words on the one hand, provides the basis of the composition and readings of Chinese thoughts, on the other. The understanding of the characteristics of Chinese as a linguistic medium of philosophical reasoning should begin with the writing mode, which surly is not a fixed system of signs and grammatical rules, but an expressive and communicative process through the involvement of subjects. Writing, as a continuous rational practice, demonstrates the specialty of Chinese philosophy, which leads us to be aware that the comparative philosophical research of inter-lingual context should be delivered from the writing mode as process of thinking.
- Chinese philosophy,
- writing,
- lingual sign,
- Chinese character
References
Access
1. [1]
  HAN Shuifa . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(7): 5-24.
2. [2]
  Juyuan CHEN . The Writing of Confucian Classics in Eight-legged Essay in Qing Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(3): 22-34.
3. [3]
  SUN Zhouxing . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(7): 25-31.
4. [4]
  CHENG Lesong . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(7): 32-38.
5. [5]
  Yingjin XU . A Dialogue between Sosa’s Virtue Epistemology and a Confucian Theory of the Rectification of Names. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 13-23.
6. [6]
  Yu GAO . On Literary Language and the Construction ofContemparary Chinese. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 141-150.
7. [7]
  Yingjin XU . How Could Contemporary Western Epistemology be Integrated into a Chinese-based Framework. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 16-29.
8. [8]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(11): 164-179.
9. [9]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(8): 179-184.
10. [10]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(02): 56-65.
11. [11]
  Zhichang PAN . The Aesthetic Discourse of “Egoistic Thrusters”. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(6): 195-204.
12. [12]
  ZHANG Wei， LYU Chenggang . Visual Rhetoric and “Liberation” Writing in ChinChaChi Pictorial. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(7): 152-162.
13. [13]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 164-168.
14. [14]
  Nini KONG . Politics of Powerful Ministers and the Political Competition in Imperial Edict Writing in the Southern Song Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 163-174.
15. [15]
  CHU Xiaobai . Writing Revenge with the Body —— On the Rewriting of “The Crucifixion” in Lu Xun‘s Revenge (II). Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(9): 152-160.
16. [16]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(02): 19-24.
17. [17]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(01): 175-184.
18. [18]
  Shu WANG , Lijia SHEN . Intergenerational Characteristics and Spiritual Trajectory of Youth Image Writing in the New Century. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 177-185.
19. [19]
  Xin YU . Knowledge, Belief and Political Order: The Historical Writing of Aurora in the Medieval World. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(12): 176-190.
20. [20]
  ZHANG Zhenguo . A Study on Daofu Asking for Instructions and Daily Government Affairs in the Qing Dynasty— Also on Instructions Writing and Its Characteristics. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 202-216.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 1381 Times PDF downloads: 5 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(5)
Abstract views(1381)
HTML views(296)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

To Understand Difference from Writing Mode

Lesong CHENG

Available Online: 2019-12-01

Abstract: In what sense could one attribute the specialty of Chinese philosophy to the particularities of Chinese as a language? How should one clarify or elaborate the particularities of Chinese? We attempt to demonstrate, we could not agree with either the linguistic determinism in the comparative research with an intercultural context, or interpretation on the specialty of Chinese philosophy through the fragmental analysis. The comparative linguistic analysis framework applied in the intercultural philosophical comparation is not impeccable, for its theoretical source from the Western academia and not tolerant to the mode of philosophical construction. Writing manifests the semantic mode of Chinese characters and words on the one hand, provides the basis of the composition and readings of Chinese thoughts, on the other. The understanding of the characteristics of Chinese as a linguistic medium of philosophical reasoning should begin with the writing mode, which surly is not a fixed system of signs and grammatical rules, but an expressive and communicative process through the involvement of subjects. Writing, as a continuous rational practice, demonstrates the specialty of Chinese philosophy, which leads us to be aware that the comparative philosophical research of inter-lingual context should be delivered from the writing mode as process of thinking.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

To Understand Difference from Writing Mode

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

To Understand Difference from Writing Mode

HTML

目录