个人信息保护中删除权的规范构造

郭春镇; 王海洋

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

January 2023

Article Contents

Citation: Chunzhen GUO and Haiyang WANG. Normative Structure of the Right to Erasure in Personal Information Protection[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(10): 92-106. shu

Normative Structure of the Right to Erasure in Personal Information Protection

Abstract

Article 47 of Personal Information Protection Law of China clearly stipulates the right to erasure of personal information, which is highly similar to the EUʼs right to be forgotten in content, but they are obvious different in value orientation, the object of obligations, and triggering conditions and so on. The right to erasure is not a component of the right to claim personality right, but an conditional procedural right based on personal information processing behavior, which is triggered by the failure of the information processor to perform the obligation of deletion. The exercise of the right to erasure must be based on the legal situation as stipulated in Article 47(1) of the Personal Information Protection Law and satisfy the principles of legality, legitimacy and necessity. Information processor should take the initiative to delete personal information under statutory circumstances. If the information processor does not delete it, the information subject has the right to request the information processor to delete it; If the information processor refuses to delete it without proper reason, the information subject can file a lawsuit. Whether the right to erasure is realized needs to be based on current technology. Its implementation is not limited to the substantial deletion of personal information in non-electronic records and small systems, but also includes the imposition of restrictions on the future existence of personal information pocessed on a large scale, making it ultimately in a state that cannot be retrieved, accessed or identified.
- Personal Information Protection Law,
- the right to erasure,
- the right to be forgotten,
- the conditional procedural right.
References
Access
1. [1]
  Fuping GAO . The Protection of Individuals with Regard to Processing of Personal Information. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(2): 107-124.
2. [2]
  HAN Siyang . Public Law Intervention in Private Domain: Personal Information Protection in Platforms. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 106-119.
3. [3]
  Xianbin YANG . Normative Explanation and Systematic Construction of Rules of Processing of Sensitive Personal Information in China. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(10): 107-119.
4. [4]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(11): 150-163.
5. [5]
  Yibing ZHANG . Unitary Urbanism: To Reconstruct the Monetized Micropsychological Atmosphere. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(6): 17-28, 56.
6. [6]
  NIE Minli . Kant and Foucault： The Misread “Enlightenment” and Its Postmodern Intellectual Effects. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(9): 14-21.
7. [7]
  Yang WANG . From Ususfructus to Habitatio: The Evolution History of Servitutes Personarum in Roman Law. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(7): 101-112.
8. [8]
  Jie CHEN , Yidong WU . The Possible Conflict between the Housing Rights and the Rights to Public Services Availability in the Process of “Equal Rights between Buyer and Tenant”. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 44-56.
9. [9]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(02): 23-33.
10. [10]
  Liming WANG . Some Issues on the Residency Right in the Chapter of Property Rights in the Civil Code. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(7): 91-100, 148.
11. [11]
  Pingxin LU . On Interpretation of the Right to Equality: Structural Reason and Hermeneutic Analysis. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(11): 107-120.
12. [12]
  Da’an HE . Stages and Conditions of the Enterprise Digital Transformation. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 38-49.
13. [13]
  Ye LU . The Discussion on the Issues of Sea Power in the Period of the Republic of China. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 187-208.
14. [14]
  Shuguang ZHANG , Chi ZHANG . Institution Economics of the Right. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(1): 40-51, 83.
15. [15]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(02): 94-102.
16. [16]
  ZHAO Jianguo . The Spread of Concept Sea Power on Press in Late Qing Period. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(6): 193-205.
17. [17]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(06): 68-75.
18. [18]
  Yunfeng HE , Erliang PAN . Better Life, People’s Livelihood Security and the Maximization of the Right to Labor Felicity. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(2): 79-90.
19. [19]
  Bing ZHU . The Analysis on the Environmental Right from the Perspective of Property Legislation. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(11): 104-119.
20. [20]
  Xiaojun CHEN . The Reform Policy of Farmland “Separation of Powers” Written into Law and Its Relieving Obstacles in Enforcement. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(1): 87-95.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 344 Times PDF downloads: 2 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(2)
Abstract views(344)
HTML views(45)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Normative Structure of the Right to Erasure in Personal Information Protection

Chunzhen GUO
Haiyang WANG

Available Online: 2022-10-20

Abstract: Article 47 of Personal Information Protection Law of China clearly stipulates the right to erasure of personal information, which is highly similar to the EUʼs right to be forgotten in content, but they are obvious different in value orientation, the object of obligations, and triggering conditions and so on. The right to erasure is not a component of the right to claim personality right, but an conditional procedural right based on personal information processing behavior, which is triggered by the failure of the information processor to perform the obligation of deletion. The exercise of the right to erasure must be based on the legal situation as stipulated in Article 47(1) of the Personal Information Protection Law and satisfy the principles of legality, legitimacy and necessity. Information processor should take the initiative to delete personal information under statutory circumstances. If the information processor does not delete it, the information subject has the right to request the information processor to delete it; If the information processor refuses to delete it without proper reason, the information subject can file a lawsuit. Whether the right to erasure is realized needs to be based on current technology. Its implementation is not limited to the substantial deletion of personal information in non-electronic records and small systems, but also includes the imposition of restrictions on the future existence of personal information pocessed on a large scale, making it ultimately in a state that cannot be retrieved, accessed or identified.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Normative Structure of the Right to Erasure in Personal Information Protection

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Normative Structure of the Right to Erasure in Personal Information Protection

HTML

目录