儒学与实用主义：内在哲学旨趣及其多样展开

杨国荣

English

引用本文: 杨国荣. 儒学与实用主义：内在哲学旨趣及其多样展开[J]. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(03): 33-41. shu

Citation: . Confucianism and Pragmatism: The Intrinsic Philosophical Theme and Their Diverse Developments[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(03): 33-41. shu

儒学与实用主义：内在哲学旨趣及其多样展开

杨国荣

Confucianism and Pragmatism: The Intrinsic Philosophical Theme and Their Diverse Developments

摘要: 人如何存在、如何生存，是儒学与实用主义共同关注的问题。儒学要求将天道落实于人的存在过程，实用主义则主张从形而上的超验世界，转向人的生存过程。在关注人之“在”的同时，儒学与实用主义又表现出不同的特点。由理性、精神层面的关注，儒学同时追求以人格提升为指向的完美的生活；由感性、经验的注重，实用主义则更为关切与生物有机体生存相关的有效的生活。人的存在具体展开于多样的情境，但儒学由精神的关切而同时承诺本体及广义之知，实用主义则由本于经验而注目于情境中的特定问题本身，并在将概念工具化的同时趋向于融知于行。生活的完美性和生活的有效性都包含价值内涵，儒学与实用主义由此关注认识的评价之维，但儒学以是非之辩接纳了认知，实用主义则趋向于以评价消解认知。要而言之，儒学与实用主义既展示了相近的哲学旨趣，又表现出不同的思想进路。
Abstract: How human being exists and lives is the common problem of concern in Confucianism and pragmatism. Confucianism demands bringing the way of Nature to bear upon the process of the human’s being, while pragmatism insists on turning from the transcendent world of metaphysics to the human’s process of existing. While focusing on human existence, Confucianism and pragmatism present different characteristics: while Confucianism focuses more on the reason and spirit in the being of humans, pragmatism focuses more on the empirical and sensible aspects of the process of living. Due to focusing on reason and spirit, Confucianism simultaneously seeks the elevation of human character and the perfection of life; due to focusing on sensibility and experience, pragmatism also concerns itself with effective living in connection with the survival of the biological organism. The spiritual and empirical dimensions of existence both concern the concrete situations of the individual’s being as well as the actions that unfold in situations, but Confucianism, due to being concerned with the spiritual dimension, remains committed to the original substance and knowing in the broader sense, while pragmatism, due to being rooted in experience and focusing on specific problems in situations, instrumentalizes concepts and simultaneously dissolves knowledge in practice. The perfection of life and the effectiveness of life both involve the significance of value, so Confucianism and pragmatism both focus on the evaluative dimension of knowing, but Confucianism incorporates cognition through the debate over the distinction between right and wrong, whereas pragmatism tends to eliminate cognition through evaluation
1. [1]
  ［美］安乐哲 . 儒学和杜威实用主义：关于“成人”的对话. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(1): 22-26.
2. [2]
  王庆节 . 皮尔士与美国实用主义哲学的开端. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(3): 48-57.
3. [3]
  陈亚军 . 实用主义的现象学意蕴. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(1): 27-31.
4. [4]
  周靖 . 论“维特根斯坦式的实用主义”. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(12): 24-33.
5. [5]
  . 多重视角下的实用主义（笔谈）. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(1): 11-16.
6. [6]
  韩庆祥 . 世界多样与普惠哲学—— 构建引领新时代发展的马克思主义哲学. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(9): 5-14.
7. [7]
  江怡 . 维特根斯坦是实用主义者吗. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(11): 5-15.
8. [8]
  徐陶 . 中西哲学会通视域中的 “内在超越”与“天人合一”. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(06): 166-176.
9. [9]
  张杰 . 中国特色社会主义资本有序扩张的内在逻辑与形成机制. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(10): 33-42.
10. [10]
  陶磊 . 萨满主义与早期中国哲学中的神秘主义. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(09): 169-178.
11. [11]
  ［英］蒂莫西·威廉姆森① . 哲学及其未来. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(7): 14-21.
12. [12]
  刘亮沈桂龙 . “共享经济”与公共政策融合的内在逻辑. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(04): 86-97.
13. [13]
  夏国军 . 美国哲学整体论思潮的自然主义与反自然主义分形. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(10): 45-59.
14. [14]
  张传勇 , 蔡琪梦 . 中国城市职业多样性：事实、演进与政策含义. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(8): 45-58.
15. [15]
  刘森林 . 回归自然：马克思与尼采的共同旨趣. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(10): 23-34.
16. [16]
  杨虎涛 . 新发展格局构建与数字经济发展：内在逻辑与政策重点. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(12): 60-73.
17. [17]
  何萍 . 新文化运动与马克思主义哲学中国化的开启. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(1): 11-24.
18. [18]
  於梅舫 . 识宋学与辨新局：钱穆《中国近三百年学术史》论学旨趣解析. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(10): 149-164.
19. [19]
  高源 . 理想人格的互鉴：芬兰学派奥古斯丁学新诠释及其与中国哲学的相遇. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(9): 38-48.
20. [20]
  文哲 . 马克思主义哲学研究. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(6): 206-211.

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 21
文章访问数: 2823
HTML全文浏览量: 163

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

儒学与实用主义：内在哲学旨趣及其多样展开

杨国荣

摘要: 人如何存在、如何生存，是儒学与实用主义共同关注的问题。儒学要求将天道落实于人的存在过程，实用主义则主张从形而上的超验世界，转向人的生存过程。在关注人之“在”的同时，儒学与实用主义又表现出不同的特点。由理性、精神层面的关注，儒学同时追求以人格提升为指向的完美的生活；由感性、经验的注重，实用主义则更为关切与生物有机体生存相关的有效的生活。人的存在具体展开于多样的情境，但儒学由精神的关切而同时承诺本体及广义之知，实用主义则由本于经验而注目于情境中的特定问题本身，并在将概念工具化的同时趋向于融知于行。生活的完美性和生活的有效性都包含价值内涵，儒学与实用主义由此关注认识的评价之维，但儒学以是非之辩接纳了认知，实用主义则趋向于以评价消解认知。要而言之，儒学与实用主义既展示了相近的哲学旨趣，又表现出不同的思想进路。

English Abstract

Confucianism and Pragmatism: The Intrinsic Philosophical Theme and Their Diverse Developments

Abstract: How human being exists and lives is the common problem of concern in Confucianism and pragmatism. Confucianism demands bringing the way of Nature to bear upon the process of the human’s being, while pragmatism insists on turning from the transcendent world of metaphysics to the human’s process of existing. While focusing on human existence, Confucianism and pragmatism present different characteristics: while Confucianism focuses more on the reason and spirit in the being of humans, pragmatism focuses more on the empirical and sensible aspects of the process of living. Due to focusing on reason and spirit, Confucianism simultaneously seeks the elevation of human character and the perfection of life; due to focusing on sensibility and experience, pragmatism also concerns itself with effective living in connection with the survival of the biological organism. The spiritual and empirical dimensions of existence both concern the concrete situations of the individual’s being as well as the actions that unfold in situations, but Confucianism, due to being concerned with the spiritual dimension, remains committed to the original substance and knowing in the broader sense, while pragmatism, due to being rooted in experience and focusing on specific problems in situations, instrumentalizes concepts and simultaneously dissolves knowledge in practice. The perfection of life and the effectiveness of life both involve the significance of value, so Confucianism and pragmatism both focus on the evaluative dimension of knowing, but Confucianism incorporates cognition through the debate over the distinction between right and wrong, whereas pragmatism tends to eliminate cognition through evaluation

儒学与实用主义：内在哲学旨趣及其多样展开

Confucianism and Pragmatism: The Intrinsic Philosophical Theme and Their Diverse Developments

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

儒学与实用主义：内在哲学旨趣及其多样展开

English Abstract

Confucianism and Pragmatism: The Intrinsic Philosophical Theme and Their Diverse Developments

全文HTML

目录

儒学与实用主义：内在哲学旨趣及其多样展开

Confucianism and Pragmatism: The Intrinsic Philosophical Theme and Their Diverse Developments

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

儒学与实用主义：内在哲学旨趣及其多样展开

English Abstract

Confucianism and Pragmatism: The Intrinsic Philosophical Theme and Their Diverse Developments

全文HTML

目录