《论持久战》的各方反响
On Protracted War and Its Receptions form All Sides
-
摘要: 全面抗战爆发后，持久战成为举国共识，可是国共两党的持久战思想却有着显著差异。针对国民党一味强调精神致胜和服从领袖以及专守防御的军事战略，共产党更加着重于动员和武装民众，及其以运动战为主，游击战、阵地战为辅的战略方针。《论持久战》问世后，得到社会各界的积极反响。后来国民党积极反共，社会各方表面称引国民政府的持久战主张，实则对《论持久战》的呼应仍是持久战舆论的稳定内核。包括作为重要补充的经济论述，也以《论持久战》为依据或参照。Abstract: With the outbreak of the Second Sino-Japanese War, a protracted war as expectation became a broad consensus in China. However, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Kuomintang (KMT) differed considerably on its interpretations. The KMT emphasized optimism and obedience to the leader as the key to success, while the CCP thought highly of mobilizing and arming the masses. In terms of military strategy, the KMT only focused on defense, whereas the CCP identified mobile warfare as priority and supplemented it with guerrilla warfare and positional warfare. Mao Zedong’s On Protracted War soon became influential after publication. Considering the KMT’s anti-Communist attitude, public discussions responded to the book in the disguise of advocating the Nationalist government’s propaganda about protracted war. Even economic argument took the book as basis or reference.
-
点击查看大图
计量
- 文章访问数: 1479
- HTML全文浏览量: 320
下载:
沪公网安备 31010102003103号