边疆治理“外交化”

冯建勇

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

Volume 55 Issue 2

May 2023

Article Contents

Citation: Jianyong FENG. “Diplomatizing” the Border Governance[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(2): 186-198. shu

“Diplomatizing” the Border Governance

Jianyong FENG

Abstract

During the period of the Republic of China, border governance showed an obvious “diplomatic” orientation. In the early 1930s, the national government theorized and politicized the “diplomatizing” of border governance. The “diplomatizing” of border governance mainly adopted the border integration strategy of shelving and compromise. In essence, it was to transfer the relevant rights and interests of border areas to the great powers. Therefore, at that time, both the government and public opinion regarded the “diplomatizing” policy of border governance as an expedient measure, that is, through border diplomacy under the situation of insufficient national strength and bad geopolitical environment, the central government will try its best to stabilize the border situation and safeguard border sovereignty. From the perspective of the implementation process of the “diplomatizing” of the frontier governance of the national government, with the differentiation and reorganization of geopolitical factors and national strength factors, their ways and expectations of frontier governance are also different in different stages and places. When the national government tried to “diplomatize” border governance, it showed that the national government had deeply realized that border governance needed to coordinate the overall situation at home and abroad. Specifically, in the border areas, it is necessary to unite the hearts of the local upper political and social knowledge elites to achieve the consistency of the central and local foreign policies and actions; In terms of diplomatic relations, it is necessary to obtain the understanding of relevant stakeholders as much as possible, eliminate the possibility of foreign powers interfering in China’s border areas, and take advantage of the situation when the time was ripe.
- frontier governance,
- diplomatizing,
- internal affairs,
- National Government
References
Access
1. [1]
  Jianyong FENG , Yuhai HU . Geopolitics and Power Competition. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 187-201.
2. [2]
  Donghua ZHOU . China’s Status as a Major Power and Discourse Power in International Affairs after the Breakout of the Pacific War. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 202-216.
3. [3]
  Zhongjun HOU . The Nationalist Government Diplomacy on Yalta Secret Contract before Sino-Soviet Negotiations in 1945. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(4): 205-216.
4. [4]
  Zhenghan CAO , Pei ZHONG , Jing NIE . The Modernization of the Junxian State: How Does the Chinese Central Government Expand Its Function of Governance in Public Affairs. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 95-112.
5. [5]
  Tianyu QIAO , Jinglin XIANG . The Underlying Logics of Digital Transformation of Social Governance. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(2): 131-139.
6. [6]
  Yipeng TIAN . The Transformation of Community Grid Management and the Upgrade of Grassroots Governance. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 125-132.
7. [7]
  Xin GU , Qi ZHAO . The Government’s Functioning of Meta-governance in Public Innovation. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 69-80.
8. [8]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(02): 88-96.
9. [9]
  HUANG Dayuan . . Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(12): 199-203.
10. [10]
  WU Xiaolin . Historical Tradition and Modernization of Urban Primary Governance in China. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(9): 77-89.
11. [11]
  Mingjun ZHANG , Youhua ZHAO . The Logic of Institutional Maturity and Modernization of Governance Capacity. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(8): 99-112, 128.
12. [12]
  Zhiming HAN . The Clarity and the Operational Logic of State Governance. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(9): 82-94.
13. [13]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(12): 103-111.
14. [14]
  Weilai DAI . Global Governance amid the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Fragmentation and the Role of Middle Powers. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(4): 92-103.
15. [15]
  Hongming WANG . Work Teams: Chinese Experience in Modernizing State Governance. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 85-98.
16. [16]
  Peng ZHAO , Yaowen XIE . The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 91-104.
17. [17]
  YU Jianxing . Beyond Technology Empowerment: How Can Governance Model Be Reshaped in Digital Reform. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 73-83.
18. [18]
  Zhibiao LIU . Regional Market Integration and Governance Mechanism Innovation in the Yangtze River Delta. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 31-38.
19. [19]
  HE Qizhi . A Proactive Government in the Digital Era: From the Perspective of Public Governance. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(3): 96-106.
20. [20]
  Dali YAO . The Basic Attributes of the China’s Frontiers. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 176-184.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 492 Times PDF downloads: 10 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(10)
Abstract views(492)
HTML views(155)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

“Diplomatizing” the Border Governance

Jianyong FENG

Available Online: 2023-02-20

Abstract: During the period of the Republic of China, border governance showed an obvious “diplomatic” orientation. In the early 1930s, the national government theorized and politicized the “diplomatizing” of border governance. The “diplomatizing” of border governance mainly adopted the border integration strategy of shelving and compromise. In essence, it was to transfer the relevant rights and interests of border areas to the great powers. Therefore, at that time, both the government and public opinion regarded the “diplomatizing” policy of border governance as an expedient measure, that is, through border diplomacy under the situation of insufficient national strength and bad geopolitical environment, the central government will try its best to stabilize the border situation and safeguard border sovereignty. From the perspective of the implementation process of the “diplomatizing” of the frontier governance of the national government, with the differentiation and reorganization of geopolitical factors and national strength factors, their ways and expectations of frontier governance are also different in different stages and places. When the national government tried to “diplomatize” border governance, it showed that the national government had deeply realized that border governance needed to coordinate the overall situation at home and abroad. Specifically, in the border areas, it is necessary to unite the hearts of the local upper political and social knowledge elites to achieve the consistency of the central and local foreign policies and actions; In terms of diplomatic relations, it is necessary to obtain the understanding of relevant stakeholders as much as possible, eliminate the possibility of foreign powers interfering in China’s border areas, and take advantage of the situation when the time was ripe.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

“Diplomatizing” the Border Governance

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

“Diplomatizing” the Border Governance

HTML

目录