从“概念的普遍性”到“实践的普遍性”

贺来

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

November 2022

Article Contents

Citation: Lai HE. From “Universality of Concept” to “Universality of Practice”[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 5-13. shu

From “Universality of Concept” to “Universality of Practice”

Lai HE

Abstract

How to understand the universal essence of human being is a controversial subject in the history of philosophy. On this issue, a “conceptualization” principle has been dominant for a long time, that is, “the universal essence of human being” is defined as “the universal concept of human being” which is obtained by the way of intellectual thinking. This intellectualized understanding of human is fundamentally in conflict with human reality. Marx’s philosophy changed this theoretical principle on “universal nature of human being”, endowed the “universal nature” of human being with a new connotation, which realizes a major transformation of the theoretical paradigm from “universality nature of concept” to “universality of practice”, and reversed the way of thinking to grasp “universal essence of human being”. It overcomes the abstract understanding on human being and opened up a new theoretical vision, which has the important significance philosophically.
- the universal essence of human being,
- universality of concept,
- universality n of practice
References
Access
1. [1]
  Yuan KONG . A Critical Study on the “Oriental” Paradox of Western Universal Narrative. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 127-137.
2. [2]
  Yun CHEN . Anxiety about the Meaning of History: The Response and Pathology of “Universal History”. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 34-45.
3. [3]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(08): 111-123.
4. [4]
  MA Tianhang . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 80-92.
5. [5]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(06): 59-73.
6. [6]
  DUAN Bo . The Modern Transformation of Traditional Chinese Economic Thought: A Perspective of Refining Iconic Concepts. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(3): 5-19.
7. [7]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(10): 35-45.
8. [8]
  Liang SUN . Reconstruction of the Concept of Sociality in the Context of Critique of Political Economy. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 14-21.
9. [9]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(07): 5-19.
10. [10]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(08): 5-15.
11. [11]
  Gang XIAN . Schelling on the Origin and Nature of Mythology. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 18-26.
12. [12]
  Daren LAI , Yuanyuan ZHANG . Literature of Human and the People’s Literature. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(1): 172-182.
13. [13]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(03): 5-12.
14. [14]
  ZHANG Huiyong . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(6): 22-31.
15. [15]
  Yongpeng FAN . The Origin and Essence of American System: From Corporation to State. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(10): 62-76.
16. [16]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(06): 148-152.
17. [17]
  Siyou GE . On the Vacillations of Public Justification. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(7): 14-23.
18. [18]
  Yuhong HU . Reasonable Partition: The Necessary Separating Space in Maintaining Human Dignity. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 106-120.
19. [19]
  Yi ZHAI . The Transition of Relationship and Value between the Administrative Subject as Franchisor and the Object of Franchisee. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 78-93.
20. [20]
  Shengming ZHU . The Frontier People in Qin and Han Dynasties and the Evolution of “the Fugitive” and “the Barbarians”. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 183-196.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 720 Times PDF downloads: 18 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(18)
Abstract views(720)
HTML views(312)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

From “Universality of Concept” to “Universality of Practice”

Lai HE

Available Online: 2022-09-20

Abstract: How to understand the universal essence of human being is a controversial subject in the history of philosophy. On this issue, a “conceptualization” principle has been dominant for a long time, that is, “the universal essence of human being” is defined as “the universal concept of human being” which is obtained by the way of intellectual thinking. This intellectualized understanding of human is fundamentally in conflict with human reality. Marx’s philosophy changed this theoretical principle on “universal nature of human being”, endowed the “universal nature” of human being with a new connotation, which realizes a major transformation of the theoretical paradigm from “universality nature of concept” to “universality of practice”, and reversed the way of thinking to grasp “universal essence of human being”. It overcomes the abstract understanding on human being and opened up a new theoretical vision, which has the important significance philosophically.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

From “Universality of Concept” to “Universality of Practice”

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

From “Universality of Concept” to “Universality of Practice”

HTML

目录