Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 10
January 2023
Article Contents

Citation: Yongjia LIANG. Ethnic Ontology: “Our People” Vs. Orang Asli of the Chewong, Malaysia[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(10): 164-175, 199. shu

Ethnic Ontology: “Our People” Vs. Orang Asli of the Chewong, Malaysia

  • As one of the “Orang Asli”, the Chewong is considered by the state as backward, uncivilised people subject to teaching and development. The Chewong resist this perspective of “seeing like a state”, refraining from contact with the outsiders, especially afraid of any physical confrontation. They maintain three layers of ethnicity: “our people”, “forest people”, and Malays/Chinese. This paper argues that the reason for the Chewong’s fear of outsiders is ontological. They think they live in a cosmos of non-human humans—spirits, animals, plants, ghosts and gods, each of which is animate only because of individual Ruwai (“濡外”), the vital principle essential to life. A Chewong should protect their Ruwai from loss in physical confrontation, or they may never be able to ascend to longevity after death. This shared sense of ethnicity among the Chewong is ontological, a sense I propose to call “ethnic ontology”, potential to transcend the anthropocentric concept of ethnicity—primordialism, instrumentalism, and constructivism.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Guorong YANG . History and Ontology. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(3): 38-47.

    2. [2]

      An CHANG . “Interior” and “Exterior” of the Text of the Chinese Constitution. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(12): 79-96.

    3. [3]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(07): 99-110.

    4. [4]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(11): 179-184.

    5. [5]

      Guangjun ZHOU . Ethnic Rights in the Evolution of the Nation State Community: Boundaries and Governance. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 84-94.

    6. [6]

      Yibing ZHANG . The Relational Ontology and the Two-limb Cognition of What-given and What-recognized. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(7): 5-12.

    7. [7]

      CHENG Zhongying . Benti Hermeneutics is Chinese Hermeneutics—— Also on the Difference and Fusion of Chinese and Western Hermeneutic Ideas. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(10): 5-14.

    8. [8]

      Mingming WANG . Association, Comparison and Reconsideration: Fei Xiaotong’s Thesis of “Heaven-Man Unity” and the Anthropological “Ontological Turn”. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(8): 143-167, 178.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 212-216.

    10. [10]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(01): 49-66.

    11. [11]

      Chongguang ZHAIXinyong YAO . Criticism of “Belief Turn” in Life Aesthetics Proposed by Pan Zhichang. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(2): 170-180.

    12. [12]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(03): 138-146.

    13. [13]

      Daren LAIYuanyuan ZHANG . Literature of Human and the People’s Literature. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(1): 172-182.

    14. [14]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(12): 14-30.

    15. [15]

      Yuhong HU . Reasonable Partition: The Necessary Separating Space in Maintaining Human Dignity. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 106-120.

    16. [16]

      Shengming ZHU . The Frontier People in Qin and Han Dynasties and the Evolution of “the Fugitive” and “the Barbarians”. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 183-196.

    17. [17]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(06): 59-73.

    18. [18]

      Qing TAOXiaomeng NIU . Reentry “Culture-Human” and Remodeling Earth-bounded Theory. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(7): 76-90.

    19. [19]

      Yi ZHAI . The Transition of Relationship and Value between the Administrative Subject as Franchisor and the Object of Franchisee. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 78-93.

    20. [20]

      Naiqiao YANG . The Multi-interlingual Translation from “Vernehmen” to “觉知”: On the Deconstruction of the Transcendental Meaning of Metaphysics by Martin Heidegger’s Ontological Hermeneutics. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(3): 162-176.

Article Metrics

Article views: 384 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(0)
  • Abstract views(384)
  • HTML views(100)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Ethnic Ontology: “Our People” Vs. Orang Asli of the Chewong, Malaysia

        Abstract: As one of the “Orang Asli”, the Chewong is considered by the state as backward, uncivilised people subject to teaching and development. The Chewong resist this perspective of “seeing like a state”, refraining from contact with the outsiders, especially afraid of any physical confrontation. They maintain three layers of ethnicity: “our people”, “forest people”, and Malays/Chinese. This paper argues that the reason for the Chewong’s fear of outsiders is ontological. They think they live in a cosmos of non-human humans—spirits, animals, plants, ghosts and gods, each of which is animate only because of individual Ruwai (“濡外”), the vital principle essential to life. A Chewong should protect their Ruwai from loss in physical confrontation, or they may never be able to ascend to longevity after death. This shared sense of ethnicity among the Chewong is ontological, a sense I propose to call “ethnic ontology”, potential to transcend the anthropocentric concept of ethnicity—primordialism, instrumentalism, and constructivism.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return