网格化管理的形态转换与基层治理升级

田毅鹏

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

May 2021

Article Contents

Citation: Yipeng TIAN. The Transformation of Community Grid Management and the Upgrade of Grassroots Governance[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 125-132. shu

The Transformation of Community Grid Management and the Upgrade of Grassroots Governance

Yipeng TIAN

Abstract

In previous studies, community grid management is mostly regarded as a grassroots management model with strong rigid characteristics that is based on administrative bureaucracy and extends to the community, with the goal of management and social control. In this perspective, the direct consequences of community grid management including the administrativeization of community and the fossilization of grassroots governance. But in fact, as an important method of grassroots management, community grid management is not a closed and unchanging model or system. Since its inception in the early years of the 21th century, griddization has continuously absorbed the innovative experience of local social governance, on “group service”, “three social organizations linkage” (“三社联动”) and “three heads system” (“三长制”), and has realized the transformation of multiple forms of community grid management. Different from the initial emphasis on management and social control, practitioners of community grid governance strive to incorporate flexible governance elements such as social services, social organizations, and social workers into the grid system, making the existence and characteristics of griddization change fundamentally. As a result, grassroots governance in the new era has been fully developed and upgraded, and the transformation from management to governance has been realized.
- community grid management,
- transformation of forms,
- community grid governance,
- upgrade of grassroots governance
References
Access
1. [1]
  Jianyong FENG . “Diplomatizing” the Border Governance. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(2): 186-198.
2. [2]
  WU Xiaolin . Historical Tradition and Modernization of Urban Primary Governance in China. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(9): 77-89.
3. [3]
  Tianyu QIAO , Jinglin XIANG . The Underlying Logics of Digital Transformation of Social Governance. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(2): 131-139.
4. [4]
  Mingke SHENG , Yong LIU . How Burnout of Grassroots Bureaucracy be Generated. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 114-126.
5. [5]
  Mingjun ZHANG , Youhua ZHAO . The Logic of Institutional Maturity and Modernization of Governance Capacity. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(8): 99-112, 128.
6. [6]
  Peng ZHAO , Yaowen XIE . The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 91-104.
7. [7]
  YU Jianxing . Beyond Technology Empowerment: How Can Governance Model Be Reshaped in Digital Reform. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 73-83.
8. [8]
  Zhiming HAN . The Clarity and the Operational Logic of State Governance. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(9): 82-94.
9. [9]
  Zhibiao LIU . Regional Market Integration and Governance Mechanism Innovation in the Yangtze River Delta. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 31-38.
10. [10]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(12): 103-111.
11. [11]
  Weilai DAI . Global Governance amid the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Fragmentation and the Role of Middle Powers. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(4): 92-103.
12. [12]
  Hongming WANG . Work Teams: Chinese Experience in Modernizing State Governance. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 85-98.
13. [13]
  Zhenghan CAO , Pei ZHONG , Jing NIE . The Modernization of the Junxian State: How Does the Chinese Central Government Expand Its Function of Governance in Public Affairs. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 95-112.
14. [14]
  Huping SHANG . The Endogenous Risks of the Bureaucratic Organization and their Prevention and Control during the National Governance Modernization. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 83-97.
15. [15]
  Zhijun YANG . Central Cohesive - Local Closed Policy System and Its Renewal: The Political Resource Reconstruction of National Governance Modernization. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 98-111.
16. [16]
  Shizong WANG , Fan YANG . Grassroots Governance Research: Reflections, Consensus and Prospects. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 80-92.
17. [17]
  Weili LI . Neo-Danweism: the Nexus Politics in Contemporary Chinese Grassroots Governance Structure. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(8): 78-88.
18. [18]
  Yalin TANG , Kun QIAN . “Refinding Residents”: Experts’ Intervening and Reengineering Endogenous Impetus of Innovating Urban Grassroots Governance Model. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(1): 84-96.
19. [19]
  Jianxing YU , Jie REN . Self-governance, Rule of Law, Rule of Virtue and Their Combination in Community-level Social Governance. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(12): 64-74.
20. [20]
  Liang GUO . The Relationship between Family and State: An Important Local Perspective to Understand the Changes of Social Governance Since Modern China. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 96-105.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 883 Times PDF downloads: 15 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(15)
Abstract views(883)
HTML views(142)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The Transformation of Community Grid Management and the Upgrade of Grassroots Governance

Yipeng TIAN

Available Online: 2021-03-22

Abstract: In previous studies, community grid management is mostly regarded as a grassroots management model with strong rigid characteristics that is based on administrative bureaucracy and extends to the community, with the goal of management and social control. In this perspective, the direct consequences of community grid management including the administrativeization of community and the fossilization of grassroots governance. But in fact, as an important method of grassroots management, community grid management is not a closed and unchanging model or system. Since its inception in the early years of the 21th century, griddization has continuously absorbed the innovative experience of local social governance, on “group service”, “three social organizations linkage” (“三社联动”) and “three heads system” (“三长制”), and has realized the transformation of multiple forms of community grid management. Different from the initial emphasis on management and social control, practitioners of community grid governance strive to incorporate flexible governance elements such as social services, social organizations, and social workers into the grid system, making the existence and characteristics of griddization change fundamentally. As a result, grassroots governance in the new era has been fully developed and upgraded, and the transformation from management to governance has been realized.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

The Transformation of Community Grid Management and the Upgrade of Grassroots Governance

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

The Transformation of Community Grid Management and the Upgrade of Grassroots Governance

HTML

目录