农民走向共同富裕的资产逻辑

钟文晶; 罗必良

English

农民走向共同富裕的资产逻辑

钟文晶 , 罗必良

引用本文: 钟文晶, 罗必良. 农民走向共同富裕的资产逻辑[J]. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(11): 38-53. shu

Citation: Wenjing ZHONG, Biliang LUO. The Asset Logic of Farmers Moving towards Common Prosperity[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(11): 38-53. shu

农民走向共同富裕的资产逻辑

钟文晶 ,
罗必良

作者简介: 钟文晶，华南农业大学经济管理学院副教授（广东广州 510642）;罗必良，华南农业大学国家农业制度与发展研究院教授（广东广州 510642）;

中图分类号: F061

The Asset Logic of Farmers Moving towards Common Prosperity

Available Online: 2022-11-20
CLC number: F061

摘要: 由市场机制推动的经济增长能够自动带来国民福利提升的涓滴效应理论，已经受到了广泛质疑。主流产权理论关于分立的产权能够诱导效率的假定，既不能保证效率的最大化，也不能保证社会公平，更不能保证实现共同富裕。相比于收入不平等，财富或资产不平等带来的危害更为严重。涓滴效应理论忽视了社会经济制度中的一个本质因素，即生产资料所有制。农村集体资产尤其是生态资产的产权公共性及利益的共享性，构成了农民走向共同富裕的重要机制。缩小城乡差距，促进农民走向共同富裕，界定和盘活农村集体资产产权是重要的选择路径。农村有着不可替代的土地资源以及丰富多样的生态资源，特别是其集体所有制框架下的资产不可分性、成员权公平性以及收益共享特性，构成了农民以生态资产为线索走向共同富裕的逻辑基础。基于农民发展账户的拓展，需要进一步就盘活农村集体生态资产、构建资产资本化与生态服务交易的执行机制，提出初步的操作策略与运作方案。
- 共同富裕 /
- 农村集体资产 /
- 生态资产 /
- 生态服务 /
- 机制设计
Abstract: The trickle-down theory that economic growth driven by market mechanisms can automatically improve national welfare has been widely questioned. The mainstream property rights theory emphasizes the assumption that separated property rights can induce efficiency, which can neither guarantee the maximization of efficiency, social justice, nor the realization of common prosperity. The harm caused by wealth, especially asset inequality, is more serious than income inequality. The trickle-down effect theory ignores an essential factor in the socio-economic system: the ownership of the means of production. The public property rights and the sharing of interests of rural collective assets, especially ecological assets, constitute an essential mechanism for farmers to achieve common prosperity. To alleviate the gap between the urban and rural regions and promote common prosperity for farmers, defining and revitalizing the property rights of rural collective assets is an important path. The rural region has irreplaceable land resources and diverse ecological resources. Especially the inseparability of assets under the framework of collective ownership, the fairness of membership rights, and the sharing of benefits constitute the logical basis for farmers to move towards common prosperity with ecological assets. Based on expanding farmers’ development accounts and further revitalizing rural collective ecological assets, this paper designed the execution mechanism of asset capitalization and ecological service transaction and proposed a preliminary operation strategy and scheme.
- common prosperity /
- rural collective assets /
- ecological assets /
- ecological services /
- mechanism design
图 1 生态资产：概念与边界

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片

图 2 基于资产型福利方案的共同富裕实现路径

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
1. [1]
  万广华 , 江葳蕤 , 张杰皓 . 百年变局下的共同富裕：收入差距的视角. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(8): 32-44.
2. [2]
  田世野 , 李萍 . 发展视域下中国农村土地产权制度的变迁. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(12): 74-84.
3. [3]
  江涛 . 数据资产的交易效应、服务收益与交易生态. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(1): 70-80.
4. [4]
  王春光 . 乡村非就业收入与中国式乡村现代化的未来可能图景. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(12): 128-140.
5. [5]
  田国强 . 三大变化与重振中国经济应对之策的思考. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(5): 36-44.
6. [6]
  刘守英，李昊泽 . 权利开放与农民的共同富裕. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(8): 41-60.
7. [7]
  罗必良 . 增长、转型与生态化发展. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(5): 54-64.
8. [8]
  张涛甫 . 人工智能推动舆论生态转型及其治理进路. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(2): 149-157.
9. [9]
  朱明哲 . 生态原则与民法的当代转型. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(6): 84-97.
10. [10]
  杨嵘均 . 网络虚拟社群对政治文化与政治生态的影响及其治理. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(05): 74-89.
11. [11]
  郇庆治 . 习近平生态文明思想的体系样态、核心概念和基本命题. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(9): 5-16, 48.
12. [12]
  黄俊杰 . 儒学能为21世纪新生态文化提供何种思想资源. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(1): 11-19.
13. [13]
  范可 . 人类学视野里的生存性智慧与生态文明. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(3): 141-154, 120.
14. [14]
  郁建兴 , 刘殷东 . 督察制度变迁中的纵向治理：以第二轮中央生态环境保护督察为研究对象. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(11): 77-84.
15. [15]
  陈明 . “集体”的生成与再造：农村土地集体所有制的政治逻辑解析. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(4): 84-93.
16. [16]
  朱平芳，方顺超 . 精准扶贫与农村劳动力流动：政策效应与作用机制. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(3): 70-83.
17. [17]
  胡志平 . 中国农村公共服务供给变迁的政治经济学：发展阶段与政府行为框架. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(6): 53-63.
18. [18]
  周晓虹 . 集体记忆：命运共同体与个人叙事的社会建构. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(3): 151-161.
19. [19]
  周盼，房莉杰 . 从身份到股份：集体产权制度改革中的共同体困境. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(11): 123-135.
20. [20]
  李蒙蒙，蔡继明 . 农村集体经营性建设用地入市对城乡居民收入差距的影响. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(10): 49-60.

点击查看大图

图(2)

计量

PDF下载量: 5
文章访问数: 420
HTML全文浏览量: 44

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

农民走向共同富裕的资产逻辑

作者简介:钟文晶，华南农业大学经济管理学院副教授（广东广州 510642）

作者简介:罗必良，华南农业大学国家农业制度与发展研究院教授（广东广州 510642）

网络出版日期: 2022-11-20

关键词:

摘要: 由市场机制推动的经济增长能够自动带来国民福利提升的涓滴效应理论，已经受到了广泛质疑。主流产权理论关于分立的产权能够诱导效率的假定，既不能保证效率的最大化，也不能保证社会公平，更不能保证实现共同富裕。相比于收入不平等，财富或资产不平等带来的危害更为严重。涓滴效应理论忽视了社会经济制度中的一个本质因素，即生产资料所有制。农村集体资产尤其是生态资产的产权公共性及利益的共享性，构成了农民走向共同富裕的重要机制。缩小城乡差距，促进农民走向共同富裕，界定和盘活农村集体资产产权是重要的选择路径。农村有着不可替代的土地资源以及丰富多样的生态资源，特别是其集体所有制框架下的资产不可分性、成员权公平性以及收益共享特性，构成了农民以生态资产为线索走向共同富裕的逻辑基础。基于农民发展账户的拓展，需要进一步就盘活农村集体生态资产、构建资产资本化与生态服务交易的执行机制，提出初步的操作策略与运作方案。

English Abstract

The Asset Logic of Farmers Moving towards Common Prosperity

Available Online: 2022-11-20

Abstract: The trickle-down theory that economic growth driven by market mechanisms can automatically improve national welfare has been widely questioned. The mainstream property rights theory emphasizes the assumption that separated property rights can induce efficiency, which can neither guarantee the maximization of efficiency, social justice, nor the realization of common prosperity. The harm caused by wealth, especially asset inequality, is more serious than income inequality. The trickle-down effect theory ignores an essential factor in the socio-economic system: the ownership of the means of production. The public property rights and the sharing of interests of rural collective assets, especially ecological assets, constitute an essential mechanism for farmers to achieve common prosperity. To alleviate the gap between the urban and rural regions and promote common prosperity for farmers, defining and revitalizing the property rights of rural collective assets is an important path. The rural region has irreplaceable land resources and diverse ecological resources. Especially the inseparability of assets under the framework of collective ownership, the fairness of membership rights, and the sharing of benefits constitute the logical basis for farmers to move towards common prosperity with ecological assets. Based on expanding farmers’ development accounts and further revitalizing rural collective ecological assets, this paper designed the execution mechanism of asset capitalization and ecological service transaction and proposed a preliminary operation strategy and scheme.