Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 52 Issue 8
October 2020
Article Contents

Citation: Leijie WEI. Absence of Subjectivity in the Study of International Law in China: Reflection and Disenchantment[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(8): 142-156. shu

Absence of Subjectivity in the Study of International Law in China: Reflection and Disenchantment

  • On the world stage, China still lacks the international discourse power commensurate with its hard power. In order to create the Chinese discourse on the International Rule of Law, it is necessary to improve the interpretive capacity of China’s international law, which requires approaching the fundamental problem of the lack of subjectivity in the study of international law in China at the present time as well as a deep disenchantment of traditional notions of international law and the mainstream international law study paradigms that underpin them. Based on the current status of international law study in China, we should, first of all, advocate focusing on the two basic dimensions of the study path. That is, both intra-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary integration of the discipline of international law should be gradually realized. Secondly, it should continue to promote the effective interaction between the theory and practice of international law. Lastly, the content of international law textbooks should be improved at the basic level and gradually become more and more localized.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Fang WANGA Little Dilemma: The Parenting Dilemma of Subjectivity in Latensive Parenting Era. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 168-176.

    2. [2]

      Hongbin ZHANG . The Updating of the Explaining of Infectious Diseases and the Disenchantment of the World in Late Qing Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 172-184.

    3. [3]

      Zhongyuan WANGSujian GUO . Forty Years of Development of Chinese Political Science: History, Challenges and Prospects. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(12): 75-85.

    4. [4]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 209-216.

    5. [5]

      TAO Nanying . Paradox in the Subjectivity Construction of Chinese Foreign-Related Legal Research and Its Transcendence. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 95-109.

    6. [6]

      Leijie WEI . Theoretical Composition and Pluralistic Practice of China’s View of International Law in the New Era. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 109-124.

    7. [7]

      FAN Xiaoguang . The Consciousness of Indigenization and Knowledge Production in Chinese Sociologists. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(1): 115-126.

    8. [8]

      Zhipeng HE . “Impossible Trinity for Great Powers” in International Rule of Law. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 98-108.

    9. [9]

      Zuoyu ZHENG . The Localization of Sociology in Germany: The “Role-Debate” and Its Effect on De-Americanization. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 120-133.

    10. [10]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 13-14.

    11. [11]

      Xuewei ZHAI . Cross-culture, Translation and Indigenization of Social Sciences. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 128-140.

    12. [12]

      Wenjun DUChao CHEN . Introduction and Adjustment: Localization Construction of the Exemption from Natural Punishment. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 95-109.

    13. [13]

      XIE Yue . Rethinking the Localization of Sociology and Quantitative Research. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(3): 120-128.

    14. [14]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(06): 178-184.

    15. [15]

      Zhipeng HETianjiao SHEN . Study on the Power of International Soft Law in Global Governance. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(1): 103-116.

    16. [16]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(02): 103-113.

    17. [17]

      Dazhong CHENGLi YUNing WANG . Opening-up and Liberalization of Services:Basic Trend, International Comparison and China’s Strategy. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(11): 40-59.

    18. [18]

      Donghua ZHOU . China’s Status as a Major Power and Discourse Power in International Affairs after the Breakout of the Pacific War. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 202-216.

    19. [19]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(09): 81-90.

    20. [20]

      Jun XUE . Declaration of Behavior Ability in Chinese Law: Connotation of System and Reconstruction of Theory of Interpretation. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 95-105.

Article Metrics

Article views: 1082 Times PDF downloads: 7 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(7)
  • Abstract views(1082)
  • HTML views(193)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Absence of Subjectivity in the Study of International Law in China: Reflection and Disenchantment

        Abstract: On the world stage, China still lacks the international discourse power commensurate with its hard power. In order to create the Chinese discourse on the International Rule of Law, it is necessary to improve the interpretive capacity of China’s international law, which requires approaching the fundamental problem of the lack of subjectivity in the study of international law in China at the present time as well as a deep disenchantment of traditional notions of international law and the mainstream international law study paradigms that underpin them. Based on the current status of international law study in China, we should, first of all, advocate focusing on the two basic dimensions of the study path. That is, both intra-disciplinary and inter-disciplinary integration of the discipline of international law should be gradually realized. Secondly, it should continue to promote the effective interaction between the theory and practice of international law. Lastly, the content of international law textbooks should be improved at the basic level and gradually become more and more localized.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return