国家治理的技术框架：从管理工程到社会工程的空间重塑

罗梁波

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

December 2021

Article Contents

Citation: Liangbo LUO. The Technical Framework of National Governance: Spatial Remodeling from Management Engineering to Social Engineering[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 102-117. shu

The Technical Framework of National Governance: Spatial Remodeling from Management Engineering to Social Engineering

Liangbo LUO

Abstract

Space is not only the field of technology, but also the functional boundary of technology. The technical logic of national governance practice is reflected in the complex ecology of the interaction pattern of administration and politics and society, technology and value and form. There is a structural deviation in public management’s cognition of technological space. Technological narrative cannot be confined to the perspective of management tools, nor can it go beyond the development limit and objective conditions of time and space. The external technological scene of national governance is not only the management efficiency, but also the ability to integrate the state and society into the community to use tools and allocate resources. The internal technical scene of national governance is not only the management project, but also the allocation of administrative resources as a management practice. As a political practice technology is the way to realize value. As an institutional practice, technology is the foundation and practical way of form construction. Public management needs to objectively and comprehensively understand the technical space, treat the development of technology empirically, understand the essence of technology from administrative production, and reconstruct the technical scene of national governance with social engineering instead of management engineering.
- national governance structure,
- technical rationality,
- technology extension space,
- administration, politics and society
References
Access
1. [1]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(01): 30-45.
2. [2]
  Zhouxing SUN . Karl Marx’s Critique of Technology and the Future Society. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 5-12.
3. [3]
  Tao GUO . Newly-discovered Bamboo Slips and the Spatial Structure of Local Administrative Operations in the Qin and Han Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 170-180.
4. [4]
  YU Jianxing . Beyond Technology Empowerment: How Can Governance Model Be Reshaped in Digital Reform. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 73-83.
5. [5]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(01): 96-105.
6. [6]
  Wenfang WU , Jie LIU . The Transformation of “Individual” in the Era of New Technological Revolution and the Response of Social Law. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(8): 106-122.
7. [7]
  Zhaowang CHEN . Social Control and State Governance Realized by Welfare State. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 82-94.
8. [8]
  Weili LI . Neo-Danweism: the Nexus Politics in Contemporary Chinese Grassroots Governance Structure. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(8): 78-88.
9. [9]
  Lin QI . The Path of Technology-oriented and the Construction of Art Theory. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 151-160.
10. [10]
  Zhenhua HUANG . Household Logic of National Governance: An Analytical Approach Based on Field Politics. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 91-104, 178.
11. [11]
  Shikai WANG . Political System Capacity: An Analytical Framework to Explain the Rise and Fall of National Governance. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 88-101.
12. [12]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(10): 67-76.
13. [13]
  Dong YANG , Zishuo LI . Regulating Technology Giants: A Re-Examination of Technical Power as a Factor in the Determination of Market Dominant Position. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(8): 92-105.
14. [14]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(08): 71-80.
15. [15]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(08): 51-57.
16. [16]
  XIAO Ying . Family/Home and Social Governance: Values,Methods,Objects and Subjects. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(7): 115-127.
17. [17]
  ZHOU Ye’an . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 33-41.
18. [18]
  CHEN Zhuo . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 42-52.
19. [19]
  Riming LIU . Marx’s Thoughts on Modern Technology. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(4): 23-34.
20. [20]
  Lingzheng YU , Xiahai WEI , Jiangtao WAN . Information Technology, Gender Dividend and Factor Income Distribution. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 63-72.

Figures(3)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 920 Times PDF downloads: 15 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(15)
Abstract views(920)
HTML views(118)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The Technical Framework of National Governance: Spatial Remodeling from Management Engineering to Social Engineering

Liangbo LUO

Available Online: 2021-10-20

Abstract: Space is not only the field of technology, but also the functional boundary of technology. The technical logic of national governance practice is reflected in the complex ecology of the interaction pattern of administration and politics and society, technology and value and form. There is a structural deviation in public management’s cognition of technological space. Technological narrative cannot be confined to the perspective of management tools, nor can it go beyond the development limit and objective conditions of time and space. The external technological scene of national governance is not only the management efficiency, but also the ability to integrate the state and society into the community to use tools and allocate resources. The internal technical scene of national governance is not only the management project, but also the allocation of administrative resources as a management practice. As a political practice technology is the way to realize value. As an institutional practice, technology is the foundation and practical way of form construction. Public management needs to objectively and comprehensively understand the technical space, treat the development of technology empirically, understand the essence of technology from administrative production, and reconstruct the technical scene of national governance with social engineering instead of management engineering.