Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 3
November 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Xiaojun CHEN. Outline of Reformation Moment and Optimizing Route for Land Management Legality in Time of Civil Law[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(3): 124-141. shu

Outline of Reformation Moment and Optimizing Route for Land Management Legality in Time of Civil Law

  • The present land management legality is facing with the ontological dilemma of “weak market”, “power centering” and “urban-rural deviation”, therefore, it is necessary yo reflect and solve it by “government-market” cooperation, mutual feedback of “rights-power”, and “urban-rural team-work for development”. In comparing and examining the two ways of land management legality reformation, the effective adjustment and instrumental function moment are to be applied to remedy “removing market” with the idea “subject autonomy”, to correct “power centering” with the idea of “rights as basic standard”, and to correct “urban-rural deviation” with “equality of legal status” according to Civil Law. When the land management legality meets the Civil Law, the basic principles should be abide by, such as “unity of private right and authority intervention”, “unity of property effect and life ensuring”, “unity of urban-rural team-work for development and controlling discrepancy”, and “unity of benefit increase and sustainable development”, etc. The basic idea of “policy-guiding, experimental-unit-in-advancing, and promoting-by-law” should be followed, and the effective methods of “abolishing, rectifying, establishing and explaining” of land management legality should be held. The rural collective land should be put in focus, and the kernel is to turn “power centering” to “rights centering”. Efforts should be made to give full play of achievement in reform in multiple ways, such as promoting the better policies of land management system in the time of Civil Law into the top plan of national land, unifying a continuous co-reform of “three lands”, emphasizing land renovation and cultivated land protection, and protection mechanism of land management legality as a basic measure.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Xiaojun CHEN . The Reform Policy of Farmland “Separation of Powers” Written into Law and Its Relieving Obstacles in Enforcement. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(1): 87-95.

    2. [2]

      Tianyong ZHOU . Deepen Land Reform and Rationalize the Economical Operation. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(2): 30-43, 57.

    3. [3]

      Liang GUO . The Order outside of the Law: “Habitual Interests” in Land and Its Governance. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 107-116.

    4. [4]

      Xueyang CHENG . Rebuilding Land Property Rights: The Basic Experience and Direction of Land System Reform in China. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(4): 98-108.

    5. [5]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(02): 80-95.

    6. [6]

      Yangzhou YUANZhigang YUAN . House Prices, Land Revenue and Macroeconomic Performance. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(7): 31-42.

    7. [7]

      Fei GAO . Difficult Position and Its Countermeasure Suitable to the Terms of Public Interests in Land Collection. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(4): 109-117.

    8. [8]

      Lei LIU . Constitutional Explanation of Chinese Land System: Issues, Disputes and Balance. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(1): 105-114.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(03): 57-65.

    10. [10]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(11): 84-94.

    11. [11]

      Shiye TIANPing LI . Changes of Rural Land Property Rights System in China from the Perspective of Development. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 74-84.

    12. [12]

      Yipeng TIAN . The Transformation of Community Grid Management and the Upgrade of Grassroots Governance. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 125-132.

    13. [13]

      Ming CHEN . The Formation and Reconstruction of Jiti: Political Logic Analysis of Collective Ownership of Rural Land. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 84-93.

    14. [14]

      GUO Liang . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 104-113.

    15. [15]

      Liangbo LUO . The Technical Framework of National Governance: Spatial Remodeling from Management Engineering to Social Engineering. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 102-117.

    16. [16]

      ZHU Meng . Operation Guarantee by Interface Governance —— Also on the Debugging and Supplement of Digital Interface to Organization Interface. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(7): 89-101.

    17. [17]

      Shiyi CHENYingtao WU . Reform of Environmental Tax and the Collaborative Governance of Haze. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(10): 39-57.

    18. [18]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(12): 103-111.

    19. [19]

      YU Jianxing . Beyond Technology Empowerment: How Can Governance Model Be Reshaped in Digital Reform. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 73-83.

    20. [20]

      Zhibiao LIU . Regional Market Integration and Governance Mechanism Innovation in the Yangtze River Delta. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 31-38.

Article Metrics

Article views: 331 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(0)
  • Abstract views(331)
  • HTML views(19)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Outline of Reformation Moment and Optimizing Route for Land Management Legality in Time of Civil Law

        Abstract: The present land management legality is facing with the ontological dilemma of “weak market”, “power centering” and “urban-rural deviation”, therefore, it is necessary yo reflect and solve it by “government-market” cooperation, mutual feedback of “rights-power”, and “urban-rural team-work for development”. In comparing and examining the two ways of land management legality reformation, the effective adjustment and instrumental function moment are to be applied to remedy “removing market” with the idea “subject autonomy”, to correct “power centering” with the idea of “rights as basic standard”, and to correct “urban-rural deviation” with “equality of legal status” according to Civil Law. When the land management legality meets the Civil Law, the basic principles should be abide by, such as “unity of private right and authority intervention”, “unity of property effect and life ensuring”, “unity of urban-rural team-work for development and controlling discrepancy”, and “unity of benefit increase and sustainable development”, etc. The basic idea of “policy-guiding, experimental-unit-in-advancing, and promoting-by-law” should be followed, and the effective methods of “abolishing, rectifying, establishing and explaining” of land management legality should be held. The rural collective land should be put in focus, and the kernel is to turn “power centering” to “rights centering”. Efforts should be made to give full play of achievement in reform in multiple ways, such as promoting the better policies of land management system in the time of Civil Law into the top plan of national land, unifying a continuous co-reform of “three lands”, emphasizing land renovation and cultivated land protection, and protection mechanism of land management legality as a basic measure.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return