Citation:
Mingdong GU. The Lamp in the Mirror: Chinese and Western Mimeticism and Lyricism in Artistic Representation[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 140-150.
The Lamp in the Mirror: Chinese and Western Mimeticism and Lyricism in Artistic Representation
-
Abstract
In the study of classical aesthetic thought across cultures, there exists a view on the ontology and epistemology of artistic representation widely accepted in China and the West. It is an oppositional paradigm based on the contrast between Western mimesis and mimeticism and Chinese lyricism and expressionism. With further exposition, this view has been accepted by numerous scholars and exerted a strong impact upon the study of Chinese and Western literature and art. To what extent is this view reasonable? Is it an accurate reflection of the historical development of Chinese and Western traditions? Can it describe the ontological and epistemological differences in Chinese and Western artistic representation? What is the real condition of Chinese and Western mimesis and lyricism? This article selects two groups of thinkers who have expressed views on these questions: Laozi, Guanzi, Wei Hong, Cao Pi, Lu Ji, Liu Xie, Ye Xie, Li Zhi and others from the Chinese tradition, and Plato, Aristotle, Plotinus, Longinus, Schelling, Wordsworth, Coleridge, Dennis, Heidegger and others from the Western tradition in relation to the views of some modern philosophers, theorists, and scholars, with the aim to analyze their discourses of artistic representation and to find out to what extent the oppositional paradigm is true and valid and whether it is possible to locate a common ground for different theories of representation. On the basis of a close reading of some influential discourses of artistic representation, this article proposes “lamp in the mirror” as a concept that fuses binary dichotomies and hopes to gain some insights for the construction of global aesthetics.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
Mingdong GU
. The Philosophical and Aesthetic Foundations of Chinese and Western Fiction. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(11): 127-138.
-
[2]
Chengji LIU
. The Aesthetics of Rites-Music and Traditional China. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(6): 171-182.
-
[3]
. . Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(3): 50-53.
-
[4]
Tao MA
, Wei LI
. Comparison of Characteristics between the Traditional Chinese and Western Economic Thought. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(2): 57-67.
-
[5]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(12): 122-133.
-
[6]
Yanping GAO
. Herder on Touching: Aesthetics of “Dunkelheit” (Darkness). Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(10): 130-139.
-
[7]
WU Xiaoming
. Fundamental Difference between Chinese Philosophy and Western Philosophy: A Third Thesis. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(8): 5-26.
-
[8]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(11): 99-134.
-
[9]
Chunshi YANG
. On the Poetical Characteristics of Chinese Aesthetics. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(2): 144-151.
-
[10]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(06): 111-119.
-
[11]
CHENG Zhongying
. Benti Hermeneutics is Chinese Hermeneutics—— Also on the Difference and Fusion of Chinese and Western Hermeneutic Ideas. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(10): 5-14.
-
[12]
Guoxiang PENG
. On Confucian Quite-sitting as a Self-cultivation. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(5): 39-53.
-
[13]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(08): 141-151.
-
[14]
Zhenfu WANG
. “Hermeneutics of Sunya the First Chapter”: Aesthetic Meaning of Sengzhao’s No Knowledge of Prajna and No Name for Nirvana. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(11): 139-149.
-
[15]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(04): 104-112.
-
[16]
ZUO Yiyi
. The Possibility of Aesthetic Education Different from the Domain of Art — On Design as a Method of Aesthetic Education. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(6): 160-168.
-
[17]
,
. . Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(02): 143-160.
-
[18]
Xiaoyu LI
. The Iconography Tradition in Intergeneational Communication of Chinese Paintings. Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(12): 128-141.
-
[19]
Zhenhua YU
. Overcoming the Contemplative Tradition: An Examination of Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology. Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(11): 5-17, 44.
-
[20]
Chunshi YANG
. Art as Gift: A Sociological Account of Art from the Perspective of Gift Culture. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(9): 123-130.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: