Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 52 Issue 9
November 2020
Article Contents

Citation: Shuangli ZHANG. Rethinking Karl Marx’s Theory of Civil Society[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 15-27. shu

Rethinking Karl Marx’s Theory of Civil Society

  • It is pointed out in this paper that the “Hegel-Marx Problem” is the key thread for us to study Marx’s theory of civil society. It mainly means the non-ethical or anti-ethical nature of civil society. Hegel is the one who has firstly analyzed the anti-ethical determination of civil society. He took this as the ultimate problem for modern societies. Under the new historical conditions, Marx has then deepened the connotation of this problem through two steps. Firstly, based on the concrete analysis of the relationship between the state and civil society, he arrived at the judgment that civil society has not any ethical functions at all and that its development is only of the anti-ethical tendencies. Then, through the critical analysis of the power relationship within the sphere of civil society, he developed a new version of the relationship between civil society and modern state within the theoretical paradigm of class domination. Based on this, he has transformed the concept of civil society (bürgerliche Gesellschaft) into the concept of modern bourgeois society. Connected with this, he has developed Hegel’s judgment about the anti-ethical determination of civil society into the judgment about the developmental tendency of modern bourgeois society. Marx argued clearly that the model of “capitalist economy + liberal politics” was necessarily unsustainable. It is also argued in the conclusion part of the paper that we could rethink the relevance of Marx’s theory of civil society from the perspective of this “Hegel-Marx Problem”.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Weizhuo ZHANG . The Ethical Implication of Community: Ferdinand Tönnies’ Synthesis of Hegel’s and Marx’s View of the Relationship between State and Society. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 134-145.

    2. [2]

      Shipeng ZOU . Marx’s Critique of Hegel’s Philosophy of State and Law and the Basic Orientation of State Socialization. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(6): 19-30.

    3. [3]

      Lixin HAN . The Contemporary Significance of Study on Hegel’s Philosophy of Right. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 5-16.

    4. [4]

      Jinhai LIU . Elements, Mechanism and Pattern of National Growth. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 74-83.

    5. [5]

      Yibing ZHANG . Back to Marx: Civil Society and Alienation of Labor in the Ontology of Scocial Gestalt. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 17-27.

    6. [6]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(04): 15-27.

    7. [7]

      Riming LIU . Marx’s Thoughts on Modern Technology. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(4): 23-34.

    8. [8]

      Xiangchen SUN . Hegel on the State and Religion. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 17-30.

    9. [9]

      Jiaxin ZHOU . How did Young Marx Criticize Hegel. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 16-24.

    10. [10]

      Jitong LIU . The Social Construction of “Social Welfare Consensus” in China and the Goal of Modern Socialist Welfare State. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 73-84.

    11. [11]

      Zhouxing SUN . Karl Marx’s Critique of Technology and the Future Society. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 5-12.

    12. [12]

      Zhonghua GUOYikun CHEN . Geographical Imaginations in the Process of Chinese Modern State-Building. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 203-216.

    13. [13]

      Cheng GUGuoning SUN . A New Look at International Tax Competition in Modern State Governance. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(1): 62-72.

    14. [14]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(08): 88-97.

    15. [15]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(10): 81-92.

    16. [16]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(02): 25-33.

    17. [17]

      Congxue DUAN . “Highway” as the Central Image in Literature in KMT Controlled Rigions and the Genesis of “National Sense of Community”. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(7): 128-137.

    18. [18]

      . Temple as Axis: “Modern” and “Country” in Village from 1920s to 1940s. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(04): 163-178.

    19. [19]

      Hongming WANG . Work Teams: Chinese Experience in Modernizing State Governance. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 85-98.

    20. [20]

      Xianliang FENG . State and Local Interaction: The Taxation Problem and Its Political Regulation in Jiashan County Society in the Late Ming Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 181-195.

Article Metrics

Article views: 1279 Times PDF downloads: 23 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(23)
  • Abstract views(1279)
  • HTML views(294)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Rethinking Karl Marx’s Theory of Civil Society

        Abstract: It is pointed out in this paper that the “Hegel-Marx Problem” is the key thread for us to study Marx’s theory of civil society. It mainly means the non-ethical or anti-ethical nature of civil society. Hegel is the one who has firstly analyzed the anti-ethical determination of civil society. He took this as the ultimate problem for modern societies. Under the new historical conditions, Marx has then deepened the connotation of this problem through two steps. Firstly, based on the concrete analysis of the relationship between the state and civil society, he arrived at the judgment that civil society has not any ethical functions at all and that its development is only of the anti-ethical tendencies. Then, through the critical analysis of the power relationship within the sphere of civil society, he developed a new version of the relationship between civil society and modern state within the theoretical paradigm of class domination. Based on this, he has transformed the concept of civil society (bürgerliche Gesellschaft) into the concept of modern bourgeois society. Connected with this, he has developed Hegel’s judgment about the anti-ethical determination of civil society into the judgment about the developmental tendency of modern bourgeois society. Marx argued clearly that the model of “capitalist economy + liberal politics” was necessarily unsustainable. It is also argued in the conclusion part of the paper that we could rethink the relevance of Marx’s theory of civil society from the perspective of this “Hegel-Marx Problem”.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return