Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 52 Issue 10
November 2020
Article Contents

Citation: Qifu LIN and Hao YIN. Reconsidering Internet Political Participation: A Perspective of Representativeness[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(10): 77-88. shu

Reconsidering Internet Political Participation: A Perspective of Representativeness

  • With the development and popularity of information technology, the internet makes it extremely convenient for it’s users to learn political information, cultivate political views and process political participation online. Online public opinion fostered by netizens’ discussion, together with online netizen-government interaction, is playing a more important role in policy making. From the perspective of representativeness, how positive this role is played depends a lot on the extent of which netizens can represent the public. With data visualization analysis on two nation-wide survey, namely CGSS2015 and CFPS2018, this article investigates the representativeness of internet political participation on two dimensions: demographic characteristics and political attitude. The results indicate that, at present, internet users can’t represent the public well in China. Further, they show less consistency on crucial attitudes as well. The biased representativeness of netizens could possibly diminish the bright side of internet political participation for policy making. Based on empirical results and theoretical discussion, we argue that government should make policy concerning the whole situation, treat online opinion prudently instead of following it blindly.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Da’an HE . Network Cooperation in Investment and Management of Enterprises in the Internet Age. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(11): 32-40.

    2. [2]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(11): 70-83.

    3. [3]

      Kangzhi ZHANG . Questioning Participatory Decision-making by Risk Society. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 71-81.

    4. [4]

      Zhao CHENDongsheng DENG . The Development, Risk and Regulation of Internet Finance. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 42-50.

    5. [5]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(12): 172-173.

    6. [6]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 8-10.

    7. [7]

      Zhongjiang WANG . The Basis of Legitimacy of Political Power: The Form and Constitution of Early Confucianism “Theory of People’s Wishes”. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 5-16.

    8. [8]

      Siyou GE . On the Vacillations of Public Justification. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(7): 14-23.

    9. [9]

      Ji ZHAO . Complexity and the Reconstruction of Public Administration. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(2): 80-91.

    10. [10]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(05): 74-89.

    11. [11]

      Xianliang FENG . People as the Core of Clan: The Kingship Network and Political Changes of the Qian’s Family in Weitang During the Transition Period from Ming to Qing Dynasties. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(7): 149-163.

    12. [12]

      . Conflicting or Reconciling: An Analysis of the Relationship between Deliberative Democracy and Political RepresentationDuan Demin. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(03): 115-124.

    13. [13]

      Shuisheng CHEN . Public Policy Failure and Its Prevention: An Integrated Analysis Framework. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(2): 91-102.

    14. [14]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(07): 45-59.

    15. [15]

      Xuedong YANGJian YAN . Governance Edging out Representation?. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(3): 59-67.

    16. [16]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(04): 113-119.

    17. [17]

      HUANG Chunchun . Attention Allocation and Economic Decision-making—— Comment and Discussion on Attention Economics. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(2): 94-102.

    18. [18]

      Zhiping HU . Political Economy of the Change of Rural Public Service Supply in China: Development Stage and Government Behavior Framework. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 53-63.

    19. [19]

      Zhang Jiang Habermas . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(5): 5-13.

    20. [20]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(05): 56-62.

Figures(4) / Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views: 1347 Times PDF downloads: 16 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(16)
  • Abstract views(1347)
  • HTML views(142)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          Reconsidering Internet Political Participation: A Perspective of Representativeness

          Abstract: With the development and popularity of information technology, the internet makes it extremely convenient for it’s users to learn political information, cultivate political views and process political participation online. Online public opinion fostered by netizens’ discussion, together with online netizen-government interaction, is playing a more important role in policy making. From the perspective of representativeness, how positive this role is played depends a lot on the extent of which netizens can represent the public. With data visualization analysis on two nation-wide survey, namely CGSS2015 and CFPS2018, this article investigates the representativeness of internet political participation on two dimensions: demographic characteristics and political attitude. The results indicate that, at present, internet users can’t represent the public well in China. Further, they show less consistency on crucial attitudes as well. The biased representativeness of netizens could possibly diminish the bright side of internet political participation for policy making. Based on empirical results and theoretical discussion, we argue that government should make policy concerning the whole situation, treat online opinion prudently instead of following it blindly.

            HTML

          Figure (4)  Table (1) Relative (20)

          目录

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return