Citation:
Law and Freedom: Normative Interpretation on Kant’s Formulas of Categorical Imperatives[J]. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(03).
Law and Freedom: Normative Interpretation on Kant’s Formulas of Categorical Imperatives
-
Abstract
Varieties of Categorical Imperatives in the context of Kant’s practical philosophy represent the thought purport of human being as an end in itself from different perspectives, and freedom is the fundamental value premise and also the normative basis for justifying Categorical Imperatives. In order to preserve and promote this value purport, confirming the universal law by the capacity of pure practical reason (unfolding as the duties of morality as inner constraint and the duties of right as external coercion) is the necessary approach, then avoid the abuse of freedom and destroy itself, and prevent the command derived from self or other sensory inclinations. Confirming fundamental idea of freedom, cultivating and exercising moral disposition, and promoting moral personality, are all the significant ways for practicing and accomplishing Categorical Imperatives. Baesd on the normative perspective, we can not only make a coherent understanding on Kant’s works in different period, then eliminate the weakness of single metaphysical justification, but also answer the misunderstanding and criticism efficiently about Kant’s ethics
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
Fan YANG
. The Social Foundation of Legal Normativity: Recasting the Habermas-Foucault Debate in Context with Legal Philosophy. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(12): 93-105.
-
[2]
Qun GONG
. The Status of Nature Law in Kant’s Ethics. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(8): 23-30.
-
[3]
Shaobin BIAN
. Dignity and Necessity: Wood on Kant’s Ethical Thoughts. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(6): 31-44.
-
[4]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(05): 19-30.
-
[5]
NAN Xing
. Kantian Freedom: Anthropological not Metaphysical. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(8): 27-40.
-
[6]
Dazhi YAO
. Liberalism’ Conceptions of Freedom: Analysis and Reconstruction. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(3): 26-33.
-
[7]
Zongqi CAI
. The Syntax and Poetic Vision of Tang Pentasyllabic Regulated Verse. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(1): 115-134.
-
[8]
Fei WU
. On the Argumentation of the Empirical Laws in Criminal Judicial Decision. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(11): 99-110.
-
[9]
Shaobin BIAN
. Leave the State of Nature: Kant and Justification on the Idea of Public Right. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(6): 13-31.
-
[10]
NIE Minli
. Kant and Foucault： The Misread “Enlightenment” and Its Postmodern Intellectual Effects. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(9): 14-21.
-
[11]
Zhang Jiang
, Habermas
. . Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(5): 5-13.
-
[12]
Bihui XU
. Humanization of Nature, Free Form and Emotional Realm-Image. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(11): 117-126.
-
[13]
Hongjie CHEN
. Symbolic Construction of Judicial Justice: Between Cognition and Norm. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(6): 137-147.
-
[14]
Xinjun WU
. The Adjustment and Transformation of Literary Norms in the Early 1980s. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(4): 162-172.
-
[15]
Yang WANG
. The Exterior and Interior System and Stipulation Presence of Negotiorum Gestio in the Civil Code. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(11): 108-120.
-
[16]
Guanbin SHI
. Normative Construction and Value Orientation of Mental Damage Compensation System in Civil Code. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(4): 121-130.
-
[17]
Xianbin YANG
. Normative Explanation and Systematic Construction of Rules of Processing of Sensitive Personal Information in China. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(10): 107-119.
-
[18]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(08): 30-41.
-
[19]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(12): 13-19.
-
[20]
Huiying FANG
. The Value Orientation and Standardized Construction of the Principle of Modesty in Criminal Law. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(7): 117-125.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: