法治建设的国家能力基础：从国族认同建构能力切入

尤陈俊

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

November 2020

Article Contents

Citation: Chenjun YOU. The Basic State Capacity in the Construction of Rule of Law: From the Perspective of the Ability of National Identity Construction[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(10): 89-99. shu

The Basic State Capacity in the Construction of Rule of Law: From the Perspective of the Ability of National Identity Construction

Chenjun YOU

Abstract

There is a new research trend to discuss the rule of law in China by quoting the concepts and theories of “state capacity”. However, when applying them to the study of China’s rule of law, some of the concepts and even the analytical framework should be reviewed and adjusted cautiously in advance. In particular, we should appropriately go beyond the “top-down domination” dimension which may be over highlighted by the “state capacity” theory. The ability of national identity construction can be regarded as a core concept linking the problem of state capacity with the construction of the rule of law. As one of the important parts of state capacity, the ability of national identity construction is not only the basis for maintaining the legitimacy of one certain country’s rule of law to the greatest extent in the era of globalization, but also a lubricant to promote the rule of law in one certain country with minimum cost and high quality.
- state capacity,
- rule of law,
- national identity construction,
- ability of enculturation,
- legal provision about Putonghua
References
Access
1. [1]
  Shiping TANG , Ling GAO , Li LI , Yichao LU . State Capacity: Out of Theoretical Wilderness. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(11): 68-83.
2. [2]
  Puqu WANG , Bin TANG . The Three Dimensions of Production Mechanism of National Governance Capacity. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 65-72, 120.
3. [3]
  Aijun ZHANG , Yuxun SUN . The Main Perspective of the Shape of Algorithmic Power and National Capability. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 96-105.
4. [4]
  Sheng LI . Legal Rhetoric in Social-Historical Context: Macro Function under the View of Community Construction. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 113-128.
5. [5]
  Qiliang WANG . Social Foundation of Rule by Law. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 110-120.
6. [6]
  Mingming CHEN . The Rule of Party-State and Rule of Law in Dual Logic. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(1): 68-76.
7. [7]
  Jianxing YU , Jie REN . Self-governance, Rule of Law, Rule of Virtue and Their Combination in Community-level Social Governance. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(12): 64-74.
8. [8]
  Shaoqing HUANG , Yi WANG , Li ZHAO . Administrative Examination and Approval Reform, Rule of Law and Enterprises’ Innovation Performance. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(6): 57-70.
9. [9]
  MA Tianhang . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 80-92.
10. [10]
  Shikai WANG . Political System Capacity: An Analytical Framework to Explain the Rise and Fall of National Governance. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 88-101.
11. [11]
  Mingjun ZHANG , Youhua ZHAO . The Logic of Institutional Maturity and Modernization of Governance Capacity. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(8): 99-112, 128.
12. [12]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(04): 40-53.
13. [13]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(09): 21-24.
14. [14]
  TAO Nanying . Paradox in the Subjectivity Construction of Chinese Foreign-Related Legal Research and Its Transcendence. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(11): 95-109.
15. [15]
  Peng ZHAO , Yaowen XIE . The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 91-104.
16. [16]
  Yuanzhu DING . Construction of Social Relations Model: Community, Sovereign States and Globalization Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(7): 66-75.
17. [17]
  WANG Zhengxu . What is Good Government—— East Asian Peoples Evaluation of Government Legitimacy and Competence. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(10): 75-87.
18. [18]
  Jun XUE . Declaration of Behavior Ability in Chinese Law: Connotation of System and Reconstruction of Theory of Interpretation. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 95-105.
19. [19]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(12): 14-30.
20. [20]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(01): 49-66.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 971 Times PDF downloads: 20 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(20)
Abstract views(971)
HTML views(136)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The Basic State Capacity in the Construction of Rule of Law: From the Perspective of the Ability of National Identity Construction

Chenjun YOU

Available Online: 2020-10-21

Abstract: There is a new research trend to discuss the rule of law in China by quoting the concepts and theories of “state capacity”. However, when applying them to the study of China’s rule of law, some of the concepts and even the analytical framework should be reviewed and adjusted cautiously in advance. In particular, we should appropriately go beyond the “top-down domination” dimension which may be over highlighted by the “state capacity” theory. The ability of national identity construction can be regarded as a core concept linking the problem of state capacity with the construction of the rule of law. As one of the important parts of state capacity, the ability of national identity construction is not only the basis for maintaining the legitimacy of one certain country’s rule of law to the greatest extent in the era of globalization, but also a lubricant to promote the rule of law in one certain country with minimum cost and high quality.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

The Basic State Capacity in the Construction of Rule of Law: From the Perspective of the Ability of National Identity Construction

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

The Basic State Capacity in the Construction of Rule of Law: From the Perspective of the Ability of National Identity Construction

HTML

目录