Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 52 Issue 9
November 2020
Article Contents

Citation: Taofu ZHANG and Hua JIANG. Risk Cognitive Bias and the Media in Risk Context[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 150-158. shu

Risk Cognitive Bias and the Media in Risk Context

  • Risk perception depends on both physical and mental aspects, with the latter often having a greater impact. The cognition of risk is objective and real or not which subject to the cognitive condition and cognitive ability of the cognitive subject. In the context of overload information and risk, the information perception mechanism of human beings becomes more complex, uncertainty increases, cognition of risk becomes more difficult, and cognitive bias is likely to occur. Complexity is the companion of modernity. In the face of the geometric expansion of complexity, human’s intelligence and rationality is limited. As the dissemination, communication and integration mechanism of the social system, media is effective for the risk control and complexity management of human society. With its professional efforts, it brings clear description and certainty to the complex world. However, in the network society and risk context, the media system is faced with double complexity, which makes it difficult to cope with the task of risk perception and complexity management.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Ji ZHAO . Complexity and the Reconstruction of Public Administration. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(2): 80-91.

    2. [2]

      Tianyu QIAOJinglin XIANG . The Underlying Logics of Digital Transformation of Social Governance. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(2): 131-139.

    3. [3]

      Kangzhi ZHANG . Questioning Participatory Decision-making by Risk Society. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 71-81.

    4. [4]

      Yuefeng CHEN . Regulating Risk Administration from the Perspective of the Law of Administrative Action. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(6): 98-110, 97.

    5. [5]

      Zhao CHENDongsheng DENG . The Development, Risk and Regulation of Internet Finance. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 42-50.

    6. [6]

      Jie WEIHao WANG . On the Financial Risks and Their Prevention in Current China’s Economy. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(11): 38-44.

    7. [7]

      Canfa WANGYutong WANG . Research on the Jurisprudence, Risks and Regulation of Judicial Application of “Green Principle”. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(3): 93-107.

    8. [8]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(08): 68-79.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(11): 34-48.

    10. [10]

      Huping SHANG . The Endogenous Risks of the Bureaucratic Organization and their Prevention and Control during the National Governance Modernization. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 83-97.

    11. [11]

      WANG Huaping . The Turing Test and Social Cognition. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(6): 5-15.

    12. [12]

      XU Ming . Aesthetics and Cognitive Science. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(8): 145-165.

    13. [13]

      CHEN Wei . Machine Meets Other Mind: Social Cognition in the Age of Human–Robot Interaction. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(6): 16-27.

    14. [14]

      Jingliang CHENXiaokang WANG . Facts Recognition and Legal Inference in Song Dynasty Judicature. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(2): 95-118.

    15. [15]

      Bo CHEN . Either Objective Fact or Cognitive Construction: Russell and Jin Yuelin on Facts. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(10): 17-29.

    16. [16]

      Yibing ZHANG . The Relational Ontology and the Two-limb Cognition of What-given and What-recognized. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(7): 5-12.

    17. [17]

      Hongjie CHEN . Symbolic Construction of Judicial Justice: Between Cognition and Norm. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(6): 137-147.

    18. [18]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 5-13.

    19. [19]

      Siyou GE . On the Vacillations of Public Justification. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(7): 14-23.

    20. [20]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(08): 40-51.

Article Metrics

Article views: 1050 Times PDF downloads: 11 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(11)
  • Abstract views(1050)
  • HTML views(136)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Risk Cognitive Bias and the Media in Risk Context

        Abstract: Risk perception depends on both physical and mental aspects, with the latter often having a greater impact. The cognition of risk is objective and real or not which subject to the cognitive condition and cognitive ability of the cognitive subject. In the context of overload information and risk, the information perception mechanism of human beings becomes more complex, uncertainty increases, cognition of risk becomes more difficult, and cognitive bias is likely to occur. Complexity is the companion of modernity. In the face of the geometric expansion of complexity, human’s intelligence and rationality is limited. As the dissemination, communication and integration mechanism of the social system, media is effective for the risk control and complexity management of human society. With its professional efforts, it brings clear description and certainty to the complex world. However, in the network society and risk context, the media system is faced with double complexity, which makes it difficult to cope with the task of risk perception and complexity management.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return