Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 55 Issue 3
May 2023
Article Contents

Citation: Ke MENG and Chang LU. Substantive Rationality and the Formation of Weberian Bureaucracy[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(3): 140-150, 161. shu

Substantive Rationality and the Formation of Weberian Bureaucracy

  • In Weberian bureaucratic theory, bureaucratization refers to the shift of administrative mode from particularism to universalism. Weber posited that the equalization of differences can drive the bureaucratization process. However, when he discussed the notion of rational bureaucracy, he selected Prussia with absolutist rule as an example rather than England which possessed greater political equality and maintained parliamentary sovereignty, leading to a seeming “theory-case mismatch.” This article takes this mismatch as a point of departure, uncovering the implicit conditions of bureaucratization in Weber’s theory and the significance of substantive rationality in maintaining bureaucracy. Ultimately, this paper offers a more comprehensive understanding of Weber’s bureaucratic theory by synthesizing substantive rationality and bureaucratization and inspiring further exploration of his political thought.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Li LI . Imaginative Rationality. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 150-159.

    2. [2]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(08): 18-29.

    3. [3]

      . On the Irrationality of False Pretence. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(04): 21-32.

    4. [4]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(07): 66-78.

    5. [5]

      Mingjun ZHANG . Instrumental Rationality and the Form of Liberal Political Romanticism. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(12): 85-95.

    6. [6]

      Xiaoling SUN . Moral Disagreements and Constructivism’s Conception of Practical Reason. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(11): 30-37, 83.

    7. [7]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(03): 48-56.

    8. [8]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 5-7.

    9. [9]

      Xiaoming CHEN . On the Aesthetic Connotation of “New Rational Spirit”. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(11): 148-159.

    10. [10]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(02): 103-113.

    11. [11]

      Xuan SHI . Rationalist Theory of Happiness: The Core Elements of Descartes’ Ethics and Its Influence. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 35-42.

    12. [12]

      GAO Like . Mirror of Society and Transcendental Reason: Comparison of Moral Philosophies between Smith and Kant. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 26-35.

    13. [13]

      ZHENG Zuoyu . Our Algorithmic-animist World : Rethinking the Instrumental Reason in the Contemporary Society. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(12): 99-111.

    14. [14]

      Liangbo LUO . The Evolution of Administrative Rationality: Tradition, Reality and Future. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(5): 58-71.

    15. [15]

      ZHOU Ye’an . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 33-41.

    16. [16]

      CHEN Zhuo . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(8): 42-52.

    17. [17]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(05): 31-39.

    18. [18]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(04): 15-27.

    19. [19]

      Zhenghan CAOPei ZHONGJing NIE . The Modernization of the Junxian State: How Does the Chinese Central Government Expand Its Function of Governance in Public Affairs. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 95-112.

    20. [20]

      Huiying FANG . The Value Orientation and Standardized Construction of the Principle of Modesty in Criminal Law. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 117-125.

Tables(3)

Article Metrics

Article views: 401 Times PDF downloads: 2 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(2)
  • Abstract views(401)
  • HTML views(60)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          Substantive Rationality and the Formation of Weberian Bureaucracy

          Abstract: In Weberian bureaucratic theory, bureaucratization refers to the shift of administrative mode from particularism to universalism. Weber posited that the equalization of differences can drive the bureaucratization process. However, when he discussed the notion of rational bureaucracy, he selected Prussia with absolutist rule as an example rather than England which possessed greater political equality and maintained parliamentary sovereignty, leading to a seeming “theory-case mismatch.” This article takes this mismatch as a point of departure, uncovering the implicit conditions of bureaucratization in Weber’s theory and the significance of substantive rationality in maintaining bureaucracy. Ultimately, this paper offers a more comprehensive understanding of Weber’s bureaucratic theory by synthesizing substantive rationality and bureaucratization and inspiring further exploration of his political thought.

            HTML

          Table (3) Relative (20)

          目录

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return