Citation:
Wei WANG, Yufei LIU and Yan XU. Is Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology A Philosophical Anthropology?[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, (8): 5-12.
Is Heidegger’s Fundamental Ontology A Philosophical Anthropology?
-
Abstract
In the well-known Davos debate, Cassirer charges against Heidegger in saying that Heidegger’s " Kant’s Interpretation” and his " fundamental ontology” belong still to philosophical anthropology and relativism. The present essay attempts to explain and to argue, through a detailed textual reading and analysis of a key paragraph in the " records of the debate,” that Heidegger’s existential analysis of Dasein should be seen as a re-opening of the metaphysical problematic in our contemporary age. It does not essentially belong to any kind of philosophical anthropology. Rather, it opens, by the way of asking the problem or the question of Being itself, a real possibility of going beyond and overcoming all the traditional philosophical anthropologies. In contrast, Cassirer’s criticism against Heidegger’s ontological Kant’s interpretation and his following the Neo-Kantian epistemological way of interpretation of Kant, make himself still staying on an ontic level of philosophical thinking and thus finally falling back into a trap of philosophical anthropology. Because of this, Heidegger concludes that Cassirer cannot catch and understand the real significance of Kant’s questioning of the metaphysical problem and of his laying the very ground for the real metaphysics of Being.
-
-
References
-
Access
-
-
[1]
Naiqiao YANG
. The Multi-interlingual Translation from “Vernehmen” to “觉知”: On the Deconstruction of the Transcendental Meaning of Metaphysics by Martin Heidegger’s Ontological Hermeneutics. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(3): 162-176.
-
[2]
Ruicheng HUANG
, Xin ZHANG
, Gengli MAHE
. Historical Debates of Leo Strauss’s Political Philosophy and Martin Heidegger’s Philosophy of Being. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(6): 85-97.
-
[3]
Huiyong ZHANG
. On Kantian Deontological Theories in Animal Ethics. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(8): 56-66, 82.
-
[4]
GAO Like
. Mirror of Society and Transcendental Reason: Comparison of Moral Philosophies between Smith and Kant. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(5): 26-35.
-
[5]
ZHANG Huiyong
. . Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(6): 22-31.
-
[6]
Chengfang ZHUO
, Daping HU
. Existence and Speed. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(10): 22-30.
-
[7]
Weiping HE
. Hermeneutical Circle and Meno’s Paradox. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(11): 15-23, 39.
-
[8]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(09): 51-57.
-
[9]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(07): 25-34.
-
[10]
Shaobin BIAN
. Leave the State of Nature: Kant and Justification on the Idea of Public Right. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(6): 13-31.
-
[11]
Shaobin BIAN
. Dignity and Necessity: Wood on Kant’s Ethical Thoughts. Academic Monthly,
2021, 53(6): 31-44.
-
[12]
NAN Xing
. Kantian Freedom: Anthropological not Metaphysical. Academic Monthly,
2023, 55(8): 27-40.
-
[13]
Liangkang NI
. Husserl and Patocka’s Life-world. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(2): 5-19.
-
[14]
Xuguang LIU
. Free Play - Free Pleasure. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(6): 122-134.
-
[15]
Ning SUN
. The Various Implications and Efficacies of Intuition. Academic Monthly,
2022, 54(2): 27-35.
-
[16]
Linhe HAN
. On the Problem of Overdetermination in Kant’s Philosophy. Academic Monthly,
2020, 52(8): 37-45, 55.
-
[17]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(10): 35-45.
-
[18]
Mingming WANG
. Association, Comparison and Reconsideration: Fei Xiaotong’s Thesis of “Heaven-Man Unity” and the Anthropological “Ontological Turn”. Academic Monthly,
2019, 51(8): 143-167, 178.
-
[19]
. . Academic Monthly,
2017, 49(08): 141-151.
-
[20]
LAI Daren
. . Academic Monthly,
2018, 50(6): 104-112.
-
-
沪公网安备 31010102003103号
DownLoad: