Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 8
November 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Xiang WEN. Sociological Narratives of the Globalization of the Art Market : Performance, Mechanisms and Consequences[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 118-128. shu

Sociological Narratives of the Globalization of the Art Market : Performance, Mechanisms and Consequences

  • Globalization constitutes the most fundamental situation of the contemporary art market. As an emerging topic in the sociology of art, research on the globalization of the art market has focused on three dimensions: performance, mechanisms and consequences. In terms of performance, the globalization of the art market is manifested in several dimensions, including geographical expansion, increased transnational organizations, alteration in sales channels, iteration of buyers and changes in prices. In terms of mechanisms, in the globalization of the art market, traditional market players such as galleries, collectors, curators and auction houses, and new market players such as data providers, consultancies and financial institutions play different roles and represent different mechanisms of practice. The former function as cultural mediators and value constructors, while the latter standardize art values, thus allowing art from different countries and regions to be interconnected. In terms of consequences, the sociologists’ research encompasses both power and institutional perspectives, the former focusing on whether the old ‘centre-periphery’ power relations between countries have become equalized in the process of globalization, and the latter on whether globalization has led to the formation of a unified institutional and organizational model of the global art market. The examination of the globalization of the art market contributes both to an understanding of the logic of change in art and the art world at the present time, and to a deepening sociological reflection on the mechanisms and limits of cultural globalization. As the Chinese art market becomes increasingly involved in the waves of globalization and is largely shaped by the latter, there is an urgent need to advance the sociological study of the globalization of the Chinese art market and its impact.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Yuanzhu DING . Construction of Social Relations Model: Community, Sovereign States and Globalization Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(7): 66-75.

    2. [2]

      Jinfeng GEZhigang YUANXiaoyan FAN . Understanding Globalization: An Analysis from the Perspective of the Co-evolution of Economic-Social-Political System. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(8): 31-44.

    3. [3]

      LIN Ka . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(9): 101-109.

    4. [4]

      Zhang Kangzhi . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(5): 78-87.

    5. [5]

      Yi ZHOU . Thick and Thin: Traditional Chinese Values and Concepts in Globalization. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(10): 120-133.

    6. [6]

      Zhigang YUANZhiwei ZHENGJinfeng GE . The Predicament and Outlet of Global Economic Growth. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(8): 67-82.

    7. [7]

      WEN Xiang . Art Market Research and Discipline Construction of Art Sociology. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(6): 116-124.

    8. [8]

      Ziniu NIU . The Contemporary Contradiction between Transnational Monopoly Capitals and Sovereign States. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 36-44.

    9. [9]

      Danli WANG . The Adaptation, Obstruction and Evolution of China’s Traditional Culture in Modern Economic Growth. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(3): 58-66.

    10. [10]

      LU Wenchao . The Sociological Turn of the Contemporary Art Creation. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(10): 117-124.

    11. [11]

      Xin DAI . Rediscovering Social Norms: A Economic Sociological Perspective of Cyberlaw in China. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 109-123.

    12. [12]

      Guanghua WANMeihua ZHU . De-globalization: Features, Causes and Outlook. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(7): 33-47.

    13. [13]

      XIANG Jinglin . Sociological Exploration of Financial Governance:A Multilevel Institutional Analysis Framework. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 131-149.

    14. [14]

      Zuoyu ZHENG . The Localization of Sociology in Germany: The “Role-Debate” and Its Effect on De-Americanization. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 120-133.

    15. [15]

      XIE Yue . Rethinking the Localization of Sociology and Quantitative Research. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(3): 120-128.

    16. [16]

      Xiang WEN . “Oriental Economy” and the Sociological Mechanism of Rural Industrialization in China. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(4): 142-151.

    17. [17]

      Chunshi YANG . Art as Gift: A Sociological Account of Art from the Perspective of Gift Culture. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(9): 123-130.

    18. [18]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(08): 61-70.

    19. [19]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(01): 42-56.

    20. [20]

      Xin HE . Study on Law with Experience:Based on External Perspectives of Social Sciences. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 106-113.

Article Metrics

Article views: 325 Times PDF downloads: 2 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(2)
  • Abstract views(325)
  • HTML views(32)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Sociological Narratives of the Globalization of the Art Market : Performance, Mechanisms and Consequences

        Abstract: Globalization constitutes the most fundamental situation of the contemporary art market. As an emerging topic in the sociology of art, research on the globalization of the art market has focused on three dimensions: performance, mechanisms and consequences. In terms of performance, the globalization of the art market is manifested in several dimensions, including geographical expansion, increased transnational organizations, alteration in sales channels, iteration of buyers and changes in prices. In terms of mechanisms, in the globalization of the art market, traditional market players such as galleries, collectors, curators and auction houses, and new market players such as data providers, consultancies and financial institutions play different roles and represent different mechanisms of practice. The former function as cultural mediators and value constructors, while the latter standardize art values, thus allowing art from different countries and regions to be interconnected. In terms of consequences, the sociologists’ research encompasses both power and institutional perspectives, the former focusing on whether the old ‘centre-periphery’ power relations between countries have become equalized in the process of globalization, and the latter on whether globalization has led to the formation of a unified institutional and organizational model of the global art market. The examination of the globalization of the art market contributes both to an understanding of the logic of change in art and the art world at the present time, and to a deepening sociological reflection on the mechanisms and limits of cultural globalization. As the Chinese art market becomes increasingly involved in the waves of globalization and is largely shaped by the latter, there is an urgent need to advance the sociological study of the globalization of the Chinese art market and its impact.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return