服务业对外开放与自由化：基本趋势、国际比较与中国对策

程大中; 虞丽; 汪宁

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

January 2020

Article Contents

Citation: Dazhong CHENG, Li YU and Ning WANG. Opening-up and Liberalization of Services:Basic Trend, International Comparison and China’s Strategy[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(11): 40-59. shu

Opening-up and Liberalization of Services:Basic Trend, International Comparison and China’s Strategy

Department of World Economy and Institute for World Economy, Fudan University

Abstract

This paper firstly examines the global trend and institutional evolution in economic tertiarization and services liberalization, and then employs the popular STRI indices to evaluate the levels of opening-up and liberalization of China’s service sectors through a global comparison. The growth, liberalization, and opening-up of service sectors are the general trend of world economic development, while comparing with other economies especially developed economies, China’s service sectors exhibits a lower level of development and opening-up. China is one of the few economies that have the highest restriction barriers in services markets. All service sectors except for architecture are subject to restriction barriers above the sample average, and six sectors including broadcasting, courier, motion, recording, telecommunication, and digital services are most heavily restricted. Considering the long-run development of Chinese economy, the evolution of global economic and trade institution especially the services trade institution, and the chronical trend of Sino-US trade frictions, China should actively expand and deepen the market-oriented reform and opening-up in services, so as to improve the international competitivness of service sectors.
- service industry,
- services trade,
- restriction barriers,
- Chinese economy
References
Access
1. [1]
  Jiechang XIA , Yu XIAO , Shilin LI . Re-measurement and Influence Factors of Total Factor Productivity in China’s Service Industry. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 34-43.
2. [2]
  Guoqiang TIAN , Xudong CHEN . How to Pursue Progress while Maintaining Stability and Promote High-quality Development for China’s Economy. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 34-46.
3. [3]
  Ming LU . For Long-term, Overall and Multidimensional Development: The Political Economy of China Road. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(3): 58-71, 109.
4. [4]
  YUAN Xiaoyan . City Size,Service Development and Female Migrants Employment. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(9): 58-67.
5. [5]
  Xiaoxing HUANG . Institutional Connectedness: The Multiple Logics and Practice of Volunteer Services in China. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 131-143.
6. [6]
  Zhiping HU . Political Economy of the Change of Rural Public Service Supply in China: Development Stage and Government Behavior Framework. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 53-63.
7. [7]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(04): 54-62.
8. [8]
  GAO Fan . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(6): 57-66.
9. [9]
  JIANG Tao . The Trading Effects and Service Returns of Data Assets with Trading Ecology. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(1): 70-80.
10. [10]
  Ling HU . From Opening Resources to Basic Service: A New Viewpoint of Platform Supervision. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 96-108.
11. [11]
  Jie WEI , Hao WANG . On the Financial Risks and Their Prevention in Current China’s Economy. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(11): 38-44.
12. [12]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(01): 87-100.
13. [13]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(05): 63-71.
14. [14]
  Yonggang HU , Xudong CHEN . The New Period of China’s Economic Growth and the Shifts in Policy Focus. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(10): 53-61.
15. [15]
  Jie CHEN , Yidong WU . The Possible Conflict between the Housing Rights and the Rights to Public Services Availability in the Process of “Equal Rights between Buyer and Tenant”. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 44-56.
16. [16]
  Xudong CHEN , Lin CHENG . Inheritance and Innovation of Traditional Chinese Economic Thought and the Construction of Chinese Economics in New Era. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 56-68.
17. [17]
  Daogen ZHANG . A Political-economic Analysis of China’s Economic Institutional Innovation. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(3): 5-14.
18. [18]
  Daogeng ZHANG . Logic of Economic Institutional Change and Reform of China’s Economic System. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 58-67.
19. [19]
  Dapeng ZHOU . Entrepreneurship and Schumpeterian Growth and Transformation of China’s Economy. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(7): 57-68.
20. [20]
  Wei WANG , Yufei LIU , Qing SHI . Population Aging、Urbanization and China’s Economic Growth. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 68-82.

Figures(25) / Tables(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 3028 Times PDF downloads: 27 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(27)
Abstract views(3028)
HTML views(270)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Opening-up and Liberalization of Services:Basic Trend, International Comparison and China’s Strategy

Department of World Economy and Institute for World Economy, Fudan University

Available Online: 2019-11-01

Abstract: This paper firstly examines the global trend and institutional evolution in economic tertiarization and services liberalization, and then employs the popular STRI indices to evaluate the levels of opening-up and liberalization of China’s service sectors through a global comparison. The growth, liberalization, and opening-up of service sectors are the general trend of world economic development, while comparing with other economies especially developed economies, China’s service sectors exhibits a lower level of development and opening-up. China is one of the few economies that have the highest restriction barriers in services markets. All service sectors except for architecture are subject to restriction barriers above the sample average, and six sectors including broadcasting, courier, motion, recording, telecommunication, and digital services are most heavily restricted. Considering the long-run development of Chinese economy, the evolution of global economic and trade institution especially the services trade institution, and the chronical trend of Sino-US trade frictions, China should actively expand and deepen the market-oriented reform and opening-up in services, so as to improve the international competitivness of service sectors.