“找回居民”：专家介入与城市基层治理模式创新的内生动力再造

唐亚林; 钱坤

English

唐亚林 , 钱坤

引用本文: 唐亚林, 钱坤. “找回居民”：专家介入与城市基层治理模式创新的内生动力再造[J]. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(1): 84-96. shu

Citation: Yalin TANG, Kun QIAN. “Refinding Residents”: Experts’ Intervening and Reengineering Endogenous Impetus of Innovating Urban Grassroots Governance Model[J]. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(1): 84-96. shu

“找回居民”：专家介入与城市基层治理模式创新的内生动力再造

唐亚林 ,
钱坤

作者简介: 唐亚林，复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院教授（上海 200433）;钱坤，复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院博士研究生（上海 200433）;

中图分类号: D6

“Refinding Residents”: Experts’ Intervening and Reengineering Endogenous Impetus of Innovating Urban Grassroots Governance Model

Yalin TANG ,
Kun QIAN

Available Online: 2020-01-01
CLC number: D6

摘要: 知识精英以多种不同形式参与国家与社会治理在中国有着悠久的历史传统。官僚知识体系的固化、基层运作机制的碎片化与行动者（居民）参与的乏力的相互叠加与彼此强化，共同造成了当代中国城市基层治理的困境。专家学者通过深度介入的方式，帮助基层党委和政府在基层治理中“找回居民”，推动以居民参与和社区协商的方式回应居民需求，进而实现城市基层运作机制和治理体系的创新，是城市基层治理模式创新的一大新动向。专家学者以居民需求与基层治理为导向，基于专业知识和社会声望，有效地实现了社区行动者参与、基层运作机制和基层官僚知识体系的重构，进而形塑了一种新型城市基层整体治理模式。
- 专家学者 /
- 社区营造 /
- 找回居民 /
- 内生动力
Abstract: It is a long historical tradition that the intellectual eliteshave participated in national and social governances indifferent ways in China. The solidification of bureaucratic knowledge system, the fragmentization of primary-level organization’soperational mechanism and the lack of participation of the actors (residents) are combined to shape the predicament of the current urban grassroots governance. With the help of the deep involvement from experts and scholars according to the ask of local Party Committee and government, we can see a new trend of “refinding residents” in grassroots governance to promote the response of residents’ needs in the form of residents’ participation and community consultation and the innovation of urban primary-level organization’s operation mechanism and governance system. This article takes the case of community revival in Z Street of Pudong New Area as an example, analyzes the participation experiences of experts and scholars which have greatly changed the governing form of city grassroots governance. Oriented by the needs of residents and grassroots governance, based on the professional knowledge and social prestige, experts and scholars have effectively achieved the goal of the reconstruction of the participation of community actors (residents), the reshaping of the primary-level organization’s operational mechanisms and the reconstruction of grassroots bureaucratic knowledge systems, and then constructed a new model of urban grassroots holistic governance. The article also illustrates that the scientific concept of political performance and development is an important endogenous dynamic foundation for constructing urban grassroots governance model, which is warmly welcomed by the people as well as highly recognized by the superior departments.
- experts and scholars /
- holistic governance model /
- community revival /
- refinding residents
图 1 专家介入城市基层整体治理模式创新的分析框架

下载: 全尺寸图片幻灯片
1. [1]
  刘亚秋 . 口述史作为社区研究的方法. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(11): 123-131.
2. [2]
  周金泰 . 从上林苑到《上林赋》：汉帝国的博物空间及其笔端营造. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(10): 182-193.
3. [3]
  易行健 . 建立多点支撑的居民消费增长格局，持续扩大居民消费需求. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(09): 17-20.
4. [4]
  蔡禾 , 王帅之 . 论城市社区矫正对社区凝聚力的影响. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(2): 125-138.
5. [5]
  彭敏哲 . 闺秀·名媛·学者. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(8): 132-142.
6. [6]
  刘欣 , 田丰 . 城市基层党建与社区社会资本生成. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(6): 160-170.
7. [7]
  陈斌开 . 供给侧结构性改革与中国居民消费. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(09): 13-16.
8. [8]
  钟宁桦，朱亚群，陈斌开 . 住房体制改革与中国城镇居民储蓄. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(6): 43-56.
9. [9]
  吴晓林 . 党如何链接社会：城市社区党建的主体补位与社会建构. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(5): 72-86.
10. [10]
  陈家建，刘伟 . 行政与自治之间：社区财政的二元属性及其治理机制. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(5): 120-130.
11. [11]
  魏钦恭，商巧琼 . 超越收入差距：幸福不平等与居民健康关系的新解析. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(2): 136-148.
12. [12]
  丁元竹 . 社会关系模式建构：社区、主权国家与全球化视角. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(7): 66-75.
13. [13]
  朱诗娥 , 杨汝岱 , 吴比 . 新型农村养老保险对居民消费的影响评估. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(11): 60-69.
14. [14]
  李蒙蒙，蔡继明 . 农村集体经营性建设用地入市对城乡居民收入差距的影响. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(10): 49-60.
15. [15]
  黄少安 , 韦倩 , 杨友才 . 引入制度因素的内生经济增长模型. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(09): 49-58.
16. [16]
  常安 . 中国宪法文本中的“内”与“外”. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(12): 79-96.
17. [17]
  胡永刚 , 石崇 . 中国经济增长：内生还是外生型. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(01): 87-100.
18. [18]
  文军 , 刘雨婷 . 从被动工具型到积极自主型：突发公共卫生事件社区防控模式的转变及其反思. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(11): 75-86.
19. [19]
  王宁 . 国际比较文学的新格局：中国学者的贡献. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(4): 144-154.
20. [20]
  杨文进 . 中国经济增长：测度、动力与趋势. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(05): 63-71.

点击查看大图

图(1)

计量

PDF下载量: 35
文章访问数: 1989
HTML全文浏览量: 335

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

“找回居民”：专家介入与城市基层治理模式创新的内生动力再造

唐亚林
钱坤

作者简介:唐亚林，复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院教授（上海 200433）

作者简介:钱坤，复旦大学国际关系与公共事务学院博士研究生（上海 200433）

网络出版日期: 2020-01-01

关键词:

摘要: 知识精英以多种不同形式参与国家与社会治理在中国有着悠久的历史传统。官僚知识体系的固化、基层运作机制的碎片化与行动者（居民）参与的乏力的相互叠加与彼此强化，共同造成了当代中国城市基层治理的困境。专家学者通过深度介入的方式，帮助基层党委和政府在基层治理中“找回居民”，推动以居民参与和社区协商的方式回应居民需求，进而实现城市基层运作机制和治理体系的创新，是城市基层治理模式创新的一大新动向。专家学者以居民需求与基层治理为导向，基于专业知识和社会声望，有效地实现了社区行动者参与、基层运作机制和基层官僚知识体系的重构，进而形塑了一种新型城市基层整体治理模式。

English Abstract

“Refinding Residents”: Experts’ Intervening and Reengineering Endogenous Impetus of Innovating Urban Grassroots Governance Model

Available Online: 2020-01-01

Abstract: It is a long historical tradition that the intellectual eliteshave participated in national and social governances indifferent ways in China. The solidification of bureaucratic knowledge system, the fragmentization of primary-level organization’soperational mechanism and the lack of participation of the actors (residents) are combined to shape the predicament of the current urban grassroots governance. With the help of the deep involvement from experts and scholars according to the ask of local Party Committee and government, we can see a new trend of “refinding residents” in grassroots governance to promote the response of residents’ needs in the form of residents’ participation and community consultation and the innovation of urban primary-level organization’s operation mechanism and governance system. This article takes the case of community revival in Z Street of Pudong New Area as an example, analyzes the participation experiences of experts and scholars which have greatly changed the governing form of city grassroots governance. Oriented by the needs of residents and grassroots governance, based on the professional knowledge and social prestige, experts and scholars have effectively achieved the goal of the reconstruction of the participation of community actors (residents), the reshaping of the primary-level organization’s operational mechanisms and the reconstruction of grassroots bureaucratic knowledge systems, and then constructed a new model of urban grassroots holistic governance. The article also illustrates that the scientific concept of political performance and development is an important endogenous dynamic foundation for constructing urban grassroots governance model, which is warmly welcomed by the people as well as highly recognized by the superior departments.