Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 53 Issue 5
August 2021
Article Contents

Citation: Jingping ZHANG. Lasting Impact of Tuntian System in Frontier Social Changes in Modern Time[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 186-201. shu

Lasting Impact of Tuntian System in Frontier Social Changes in Modern Time

  • This paper uses hydraulic affairs of Jinta county, Gansu province between 1719-1949 as the main axis to analyze evolution features of frontier society that came into being in a span of over two hundred years because of the military-agricultural colonies (tuntian) system. During the Qing Dynasty tuntian period, hydraulic affairs of Jinta county were completely controlled by the government and were returned into the hands of the people after the tuntian period. However, due to the government’s preconceived notion that local public figures in a frontier society were prone to instigate social instability, local gentry were deliberately rejected from the management of hydraulic affairs. During the Republican period, with the outbreak of externally induced hydraulic crisis, external “fight for water” became a matter of life and death for regional societies. The government turned to support local gentry to actively “fight for water”, allowing them to take control of county hydraulic affairs. The gentry that succeeded in the “fight for water” rapidly slacked off and deteriorated, resulting in the abandonment of hydraulic affairs within Jinta county as well as social conflict. The non-pressing “external fight for water” became the only social consensus. From tuntian to the “fight for water”, in most of modern time, Jinta society has always been drawn by a one-dimensional social control target, and had yet to embark on a prosperous, orderly and vibrant path of development. Complex political and environmental elements bear intersecting impact amid this, yet the remnant institutions of the tuntian period continue to play a crucial role. Though only for a short period, tuntian activities brought forth the type of long term “tuntian society” on the frontier, with lasting impact to this day.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(06): 173-177.

    2. [2]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(05): 135-147.

    3. [3]

      Jitong LIU . The Social Construction of “Social Welfare Consensus” in China and the Goal of Modern Socialist Welfare State. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 73-84.

    4. [4]

      Baifeng CHEN . The Choice of Mode of Rural Land System in Concerning with Water Supply. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(5): 113-125.

    5. [5]

      Jian YUAN . From the General Intellectual History to the Intellectual History of Borderland. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(11): 160-167.

    6. [6]

      Qingxiong ZHANG . The Social Function of Public Interpretation and Its Intersubjective Communication Mode with Critical Dimension. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(11): 24-30.

    7. [7]

      Jianyong FENG . “Diplomatizing” the Border Governance. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(2): 186-198.

    8. [8]

      HUANG Dayuan . . Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(12): 199-203.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(07): 78-87.

    10. [10]

      Dali YAO . The Basic Attributes of the China’s Frontiers. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 176-184.

    11. [11]

      Zhiyang LIUBin LIHewu CHEN . Social Entrepreneurship and Rural Revitalization. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(11): 77-88.

    12. [12]

      Qiliang WANG . Social Foundation of Rule by Law. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 110-120.

    13. [13]

      WANG Huaping . The Turing Test and Social Cognition. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(6): 5-15.

    14. [14]

      Jianyong FENG . The “Local” Pattern and the Meaning of “World” of Borderland. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(12): 166-175.

    15. [15]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(02): 66-75.

    16. [16]

      Hongquan LIANJialin JIANG . Could Dialect Skill Act as a Signal of Social Identification. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(4): 55-68.

    17. [17]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(06): 132-138.

    18. [18]

      XIANG Jinglin . Sociological Exploration of Financial Governance:A Multilevel Institutional Analysis Framework. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 131-149.

    19. [19]

      WANG Jinfeng . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(7): 159-172.

    20. [20]

      Zhenghan CAOJing NIEXiaoming ZHANG . Centralization and Decentralization of Public Goods Provision in China: The Relations with State Governance. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(4): 69-83.

Article Metrics

Article views: 846 Times PDF downloads: 7 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(7)
  • Abstract views(846)
  • HTML views(88)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        Lasting Impact of Tuntian System in Frontier Social Changes in Modern Time

        Abstract: This paper uses hydraulic affairs of Jinta county, Gansu province between 1719-1949 as the main axis to analyze evolution features of frontier society that came into being in a span of over two hundred years because of the military-agricultural colonies (tuntian) system. During the Qing Dynasty tuntian period, hydraulic affairs of Jinta county were completely controlled by the government and were returned into the hands of the people after the tuntian period. However, due to the government’s preconceived notion that local public figures in a frontier society were prone to instigate social instability, local gentry were deliberately rejected from the management of hydraulic affairs. During the Republican period, with the outbreak of externally induced hydraulic crisis, external “fight for water” became a matter of life and death for regional societies. The government turned to support local gentry to actively “fight for water”, allowing them to take control of county hydraulic affairs. The gentry that succeeded in the “fight for water” rapidly slacked off and deteriorated, resulting in the abandonment of hydraulic affairs within Jinta county as well as social conflict. The non-pressing “external fight for water” became the only social consensus. From tuntian to the “fight for water”, in most of modern time, Jinta society has always been drawn by a one-dimensional social control target, and had yet to embark on a prosperous, orderly and vibrant path of development. Complex political and environmental elements bear intersecting impact amid this, yet the remnant institutions of the tuntian period continue to play a crucial role. Though only for a short period, tuntian activities brought forth the type of long term “tuntian society” on the frontier, with lasting impact to this day.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return