掠夺与归还：西方争议性遗产的伦理困境

冯莎; 张志培

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

January 2022

Article Contents

Citation: Sha FENG and Zhipei ZHANG. Plunder and Return: Colonial-era Artifacts as Contested Cultural Heritage and Their Ethical Predicament[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 186-199. shu

Plunder and Return: Colonial-era Artifacts as Contested Cultural Heritage and Their Ethical Predicament

Sha FENG ,
Zhipei ZHANG

Abstract

The return of colonial-era artifacts has greatly exaggerated the ethical predicament of decolonization and post-colonial conditions. The restitution of African cultural heritage is expected to establish a new relational ethic (of the colonizer and the colonized). Yet the idea behind the restitution is grounded in the rights to private ownership in close relation to capitalism, and thus has political-economic and theoretical implications we seek to explore in this article. Though there has been much debate over the restitution of cultural objects, objects or things are still understood in light of something possessable or alienable without socio-cultural and sacred values. However, instead of instituting a new ethical relation, this idea of objecthood faces the difficulty that the original materiality of colonial-era artifacts hardly restores when returning their home countries. In this article, we suggest that the debate over the restitution of cultural objects should be engaged in the material turn in anthropology or what is called “new materialism”,which is helpful for us to reflect on the materiality of cultural objects.
- colonial-era artifacts,
- cultural heritage,
- ethics of property right,
- materiality,
- decolonization
References
Access
1. [1]
  Anfeng SHENG . On Postcolonial Poetics in the Era of Post-theory. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 155-163.
2. [2]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(01): 137-144.
3. [3]
  Liming WANG . Some Issues on the Residency Right in the Chapter of Property Rights in the Civil Code. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(7): 91-100, 148.
4. [4]
  Zhengxin HUO , Ruida CHEN . Jurisprudential Thinking on Cultural Property Recovery from the Perspective of Cultural Sovereignty. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 112-126.
5. [5]
  SANG Bing . The New Culture Movement and the Flourishing of Publications. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(3): 196-211.
6. [6]
  Zuoyu ZHENG . The Localization of Sociology in Germany: The “Role-Debate” and Its Effect on De-Americanization. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 120-133.
7. [7]
  Tangfa CHEN . Media Culture: Life style of Category of Ethics or Right. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 151-158, 179.
8. [8]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(12): 103-111.
9. [9]
  XIA Zhongyi . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(9): 121-130.
10. [10]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(09): 13-14.
11. [11]
  Pingxin LU . On Interpretation of the Right to Equality: Structural Reason and Hermeneutic Analysis. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(11): 107-120.
12. [12]
  Peng ZHAO , Yaowen XIE . The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 91-104.
13. [13]
  Shaobin BIAN . Dignity and Necessity: Wood on Kant’s Ethical Thoughts. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(6): 31-44.
14. [14]
  Xuewei ZHAI . Cross-culture, Translation and Indigenization of Social Sciences. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(5): 128-140.
15. [15]
  Nanzhi WEI . Dynamics of Conflicts of Cultural Identity & Social Inequality in United States. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(2): 85-96.
16. [16]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(04): 102-113.
17. [17]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(08): 100-112.
18. [18]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(01): 117-126.
19. [19]
  Da’an HE . Stages and Conditions of the Enterprise Digital Transformation. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 38-49.
20. [20]
  Huiying FANG . The Value Orientation and Standardized Construction of the Principle of Modesty in Criminal Law. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 117-125.

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 534 Times PDF downloads: 5 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(5)
Abstract views(534)
HTML views(47)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

Plunder and Return: Colonial-era Artifacts as Contested Cultural Heritage and Their Ethical Predicament

Sha FENG
Zhipei ZHANG

Available Online: 2021-11-20

Abstract: The return of colonial-era artifacts has greatly exaggerated the ethical predicament of decolonization and post-colonial conditions. The restitution of African cultural heritage is expected to establish a new relational ethic (of the colonizer and the colonized). Yet the idea behind the restitution is grounded in the rights to private ownership in close relation to capitalism, and thus has political-economic and theoretical implications we seek to explore in this article. Though there has been much debate over the restitution of cultural objects, objects or things are still understood in light of something possessable or alienable without socio-cultural and sacred values. However, instead of instituting a new ethical relation, this idea of objecthood faces the difficulty that the original materiality of colonial-era artifacts hardly restores when returning their home countries. In this article, we suggest that the debate over the restitution of cultural objects should be engaged in the material turn in anthropology or what is called “new materialism”,which is helpful for us to reflect on the materiality of cultural objects.

HTML

Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

Plunder and Return: Colonial-era Artifacts as Contested Cultural Heritage and Their Ethical Predicament

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

Plunder and Return: Colonial-era Artifacts as Contested Cultural Heritage and Their Ethical Predicament

HTML

目录