Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 8
November 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Zhiming HAN and Chunsheng LI. The Basic Dimensions of the Governance Interface and Its Operation[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 80-90. shu

The Basic Dimensions of the Governance Interface and Its Operation

  • Public governance is a process in which multiple subjects interact, constructing a social space that includes people and things and their relationships. It is a conceptual tool to analyze public governance and its operation from a spatial perspective, including area, span, hierarchy and density, etc. Different dimensions correspond to specific forms of public governance and include related issues. Public governance change reconstructs the governance structure and its processes by constructing interfaces, specifically by delineating the area of the interface, adjusting the span of governance, selecting the levels of governance, and increasing or decreasing the density of governance. Specific governance changes have different forms and contents, but they all involve changes in these four aspects of the governance interface to varying degrees, ultimately resulting in different governance effectiveness, which may either improve the agility of governance or lead to the blurring of authority and responsibility, etc. The scalability of the governance interface is an important way to see public governance and its operation, which is not simply a matter of technology application, but contains complex power and interest considerations, especially related to the feasibility of interaction, the effectiveness of control, and the availability of information and the efficiency of its application.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Jianyong FENG . “Diplomatizing” the Border Governance. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(2): 186-198.

    2. [2]

      ZHU Meng . Operation Guarantee by Interface Governance —— Also on the Debugging and Supplement of Digital Interface to Organization Interface. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(7): 89-101.

    3. [3]

      Xin GUQi ZHAO . The Government’s Functioning of Meta-governance in Public Innovation. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(1): 69-80.

    4. [4]

      Zhenghan CAOPei ZHONGJing NIE . The Modernization of the Junxian State: How Does the Chinese Central Government Expand Its Function of Governance in Public Affairs. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 95-112.

    5. [5]

      Shuisheng CHEN . Public Policy Failure and Its Prevention: An Integrated Analysis Framework. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(2): 91-102.

    6. [6]

      Zhenghan CAOJing NIEXiaoming ZHANG . Centralization and Decentralization of Public Goods Provision in China: The Relations with State Governance. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(4): 69-83.

    7. [7]

      HE Qizhi . A Proactive Government in the Digital Era: From the Perspective of Public Governance. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(3): 96-106.

    8. [8]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(11): 67-101.

    9. [9]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(01): 96-105.

    10. [10]

      Xiangzhou HE . The Marginal Model of Public Governance and the Verification of the People-oriented Public Governance Idea. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(12): 68-78.

    11. [11]

      Xuedong YANGJian YAN . Governance Edging out Representation?. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(3): 59-67.

    12. [12]

      Yipeng TIAN . The Transformation of Community Grid Management and the Upgrade of Grassroots Governance. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 125-132.

    13. [13]

      Tianyu QIAOJinglin XIANG . The Underlying Logics of Digital Transformation of Social Governance. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(2): 131-139.

    14. [14]

      Yuefei WU . Towards Mobility Governance: Theoretical Reconstruction of New Regional Space and Its Action Strategies. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(2): 86-95.

    15. [15]

      Liangbo LUO . The Technical Framework of National Governance: Spatial Remodeling from Management Engineering to Social Engineering. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(10): 102-117.

    16. [16]

      Ping FU . Creating Leading-edge Integrated Governance: The Governance Innovation of Poverty Alleviation in China. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 121-131.

    17. [17]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(10): 66-80.

    18. [18]

      Mingjun ZHANGYouhua ZHAO . The Logic of Institutional Maturity and Modernization of Governance Capacity. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(8): 99-112, 128.

    19. [19]

      Peng ZHAOYaowen XIE . The Ethical Dimension of Science-Technology Governance and Its Legalization. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(8): 91-104.

    20. [20]

      WU Xiaolin . Historical Tradition and Modernization of Urban Primary Governance in China. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(9): 77-89.

Tables(1)

Article Metrics

Article views: 451 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(0)
  • Abstract views(451)
  • HTML views(37)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          The Basic Dimensions of the Governance Interface and Its Operation

          Abstract: Public governance is a process in which multiple subjects interact, constructing a social space that includes people and things and their relationships. It is a conceptual tool to analyze public governance and its operation from a spatial perspective, including area, span, hierarchy and density, etc. Different dimensions correspond to specific forms of public governance and include related issues. Public governance change reconstructs the governance structure and its processes by constructing interfaces, specifically by delineating the area of the interface, adjusting the span of governance, selecting the levels of governance, and increasing or decreasing the density of governance. Specific governance changes have different forms and contents, but they all involve changes in these four aspects of the governance interface to varying degrees, ultimately resulting in different governance effectiveness, which may either improve the agility of governance or lead to the blurring of authority and responsibility, etc. The scalability of the governance interface is an important way to see public governance and its operation, which is not simply a matter of technology application, but contains complex power and interest considerations, especially related to the feasibility of interaction, the effectiveness of control, and the availability of information and the efficiency of its application.

            HTML

          Table (1) Relative (20)

          目录

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return