“闽揽”与明中后期入澳闽商的“污名化”现象

张侃

“闽揽”与明中后期入澳闽商的“污名化”现象—以《盟水斋存牍》若干案例为中心

张侃

作者简介: 张侃，厦门大学历史系教授（福建厦门361005）;

中图分类号: K23

“Minlan” and the Stigmatization of Fujian Merchants in Macao in Late Ming Dynasty

Kan ZHANG

Available Online: 2022-03-20
CLC number: K23

摘要: 葡萄牙人在1557年居留澳门之后，带来了中西贸易的新突破。闽商利用澳票制度入澳经营，成为葡萄牙人的商业伙伴。闽商的商业行为既有合法正当的经济活动，也有“违禁走私”等越轨之举。后者触及地方政府和官绅的经济利益的经济行为。官方文献由此以“闽奸”“闽揽”等指称闽商群体，产生了“污名化”现象。《盟水斋存牍》的相关案例显示，闽商“污名化”原因大略可总结为：一是广东地方官与地方士绅从王朝正统和义利观念出发歧视闽商，以“揽”和“奸”来表述与葡萄牙人进行商业活动的外来商业群体，出现“闽揽”“闽奸”等特有贬称。二是随着全球化经济利益的扩大，闽商群体内部的分化和分歧现象也逐渐严重，商业形象被极度恶化，“污名化”具有了被表述的事实依据。三是明中叶之后社会经济变迁所致，商品经济繁荣引发了身份秩序转变，士绅庶民产生了身份焦虑性，常常以“污名化”方式塑造对立面或替罪羊，演变成为一种普遍心态。入澳闽商虽被广东的官方文献贬之为奸滑险恶之徒，但在福建地方公共事务中扮演着重要角色，被视为地域社会的精英人物。
- 闽商 /
- 污名化 /
- 《盟水斋存牍》 /
- 海洋社群 /
- 身份政治
Abstract: After the Portuguese settled in Macau, they brought a breakthrough in Sino-Western trade. Via the “Aopiao”（ “澳票” ） system, Fujian merchants could trade in Macao and became business partners of the Portuguese. They carried on legitimate economic activities, as well as illegal ones like prohibited smuggling. The latter infringed the economic interests of local governments and officials. Therefore, official documents referred to Fujian businessmen as “Minjian”（ “闽奸” ） and “Minlan”（ “闽揽” ）, resulting in the phenomenon of stigmatization. The relevant cases in Mengshuizhai cundu（《盟水斋存牍》） showed that the reasons for the stigmatization of Fujian businessmen were: First, local officials and gentry in Guangdong discriminated against Fujian businessmen from the concept of dynastic orthodoxy and Yili（ “义利” ）, and used “Lan”（ “揽” ） and “Jian”（ “奸” ） to describe the foreign business groups that did business with the Portuguese, so that there were unique derogatory names such as “Minlan” and “Minjian”. Second, with the expansion of the economic interests of globalization, differentiation and disagreement within the Fujian business group have gradually become serious, and their business image has extremely deteriorated. The third is due to social and economic changes after the mid-Ming Dynasty. The prosperity of the commodity economy triggered the transformation of the identity order. The gentry and the common people became anxious about their identity. They often shaped the opposition or scapegoat through stigmatization, which gradually evolved into a common mentality. Although Fujian merchants were looked down upon as treacherous and sinister people by official documents in Guangdong, they played an important role in local public affairs in Fujian and were regarded as the elites of the local society.
- Fujian businessmen /
- stigmatization /
- Mengshuizhai Cundu /
- marine community /
- identity politics
1. [1]
  杨嵘均 . 网络虚拟社群对政治文化与政治生态的影响及其治理. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(05): 74-89.
2. [2]
  吴莹 , 周飞舟 . 空间身份权利：转居农民的市民化实践. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(10): 142-153.
3. [3]
  王东杰 . 近代道教之污名及其净化. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(04): 142-162.
4. [4]
  黄纯艳 . 宋元海洋知识中的“海”与“洋”. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(3): 155-166, 184.
5. [5]
  陈明 . 中国乡村现代化的政治经济学引论. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(9): 72-84.
6. [6]
  葛劲峰 , 袁志刚 , 樊潇彦 . 理解全球化：基于“经济−社会−政治”体系共生演化视角的分析. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(8): 31-44.
7. [7]
  金进 . 海外华人社群的分化与维新文人的文学记忆. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(12): 133-141.
8. [8]
  杨志军 . 中央聚合—地方封闭政策体制及其更新：国家治理现代化的政治资源再造. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(1): 98-111.
9. [9]
  陈国灿 , 王涛 . 依海兴族：东南沿海传统海商家谱与海洋文化. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(01): 31-37.
10. [10]
  黄纯艳 . 中国古代官方海洋知识的生成与书写——以唐宋为中心. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(01): 175-184.
11. [11]
  张一兵 . 先在的数字化蒙太奇构架与意识的政治经济学—— 斯蒂格勒《技术与时间》的解读. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(08): 51-57.
12. [12]
  阙天舒，方彪 . 西方政党政治现代化中的“迷思”——基于一种“政党计算”范式的比较分析. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(6): 88-100.
13. [13]
  王宏超 . 巫术、技术与污名：晚清教案中“挖眼用于照相”谣言的形成与传播. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(12): 162-171.
14. [14]
  胡大雷 . “立言不朽”：从个人到朝廷文化建设—— 兼论文士身份的定位. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(01): 139-148.
15. [15]
  陈怡俊 . 身份转换策略与社会规范的动态平衡. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(08): 30-41.
16. [16]
  钭晓东 , 黄秀蓉 . 利益博弈- 文化征服- 身份认同：遗传资源知识产权的深层解读. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(09): 91-101.
17. [17]
  李贵 . 汴京气象：宋代文学中东京的声音景观与身份认同. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(1): 167-177.
18. [18]
  周盼，房莉杰 . 从身份到股份：集体产权制度改革中的共同体困境. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(11): 123-135.
19. [19]
  岳经纶 , 方珂 . 从“社会身份本位”到“人类需要本位”：中国社会政策的范式演进. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(2): 68-77.
20. [20]
  孙明 . 圣王制作与孔子述道——先秦两汉的圣人观与孔子身份. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(5): 178-201.

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 0
文章访问数: 305
HTML全文浏览量: 32

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

“闽揽”与明中后期入澳闽商的“污名化”现象

作者简介:张侃，厦门大学历史系教授（福建厦门361005）

网络出版日期: 2022-03-20

关键词:

摘要: 葡萄牙人在1557年居留澳门之后，带来了中西贸易的新突破。闽商利用澳票制度入澳经营，成为葡萄牙人的商业伙伴。闽商的商业行为既有合法正当的经济活动，也有“违禁走私”等越轨之举。后者触及地方政府和官绅的经济利益的经济行为。官方文献由此以“闽奸”“闽揽”等指称闽商群体，产生了“污名化”现象。《盟水斋存牍》的相关案例显示，闽商“污名化”原因大略可总结为：一是广东地方官与地方士绅从王朝正统和义利观念出发歧视闽商，以“揽”和“奸”来表述与葡萄牙人进行商业活动的外来商业群体，出现“闽揽”“闽奸”等特有贬称。二是随着全球化经济利益的扩大，闽商群体内部的分化和分歧现象也逐渐严重，商业形象被极度恶化，“污名化”具有了被表述的事实依据。三是明中叶之后社会经济变迁所致，商品经济繁荣引发了身份秩序转变，士绅庶民产生了身份焦虑性，常常以“污名化”方式塑造对立面或替罪羊，演变成为一种普遍心态。入澳闽商虽被广东的官方文献贬之为奸滑险恶之徒，但在福建地方公共事务中扮演着重要角色，被视为地域社会的精英人物。

“Minlan” and the Stigmatization of Fujian Merchants in Macao in Late Ming Dynasty

Available Online: 2022-03-20

Abstract: After the Portuguese settled in Macau, they brought a breakthrough in Sino-Western trade. Via the “Aopiao”（ “澳票” ） system, Fujian merchants could trade in Macao and became business partners of the Portuguese. They carried on legitimate economic activities, as well as illegal ones like prohibited smuggling. The latter infringed the economic interests of local governments and officials. Therefore, official documents referred to Fujian businessmen as “Minjian”（ “闽奸” ） and “Minlan”（ “闽揽” ）, resulting in the phenomenon of stigmatization. The relevant cases in Mengshuizhai cundu（《盟水斋存牍》） showed that the reasons for the stigmatization of Fujian businessmen were: First, local officials and gentry in Guangdong discriminated against Fujian businessmen from the concept of dynastic orthodoxy and Yili（ “义利” ）, and used “Lan”（ “揽” ） and “Jian”（ “奸” ） to describe the foreign business groups that did business with the Portuguese, so that there were unique derogatory names such as “Minlan” and “Minjian”. Second, with the expansion of the economic interests of globalization, differentiation and disagreement within the Fujian business group have gradually become serious, and their business image has extremely deteriorated. The third is due to social and economic changes after the mid-Ming Dynasty. The prosperity of the commodity economy triggered the transformation of the identity order. The gentry and the common people became anxious about their identity. They often shaped the opposition or scapegoat through stigmatization, which gradually evolved into a common mentality. Although Fujian merchants were looked down upon as treacherous and sinister people by official documents in Guangdong, they played an important role in local public affairs in Fujian and were regarded as the elites of the local society.

“闽揽”与明中后期入澳闽商的“污名化”现象—以《盟水斋存牍》若干案例为中心

作者简介: 张侃，厦门大学历史系教授（福建厦门361005）;

“Minlan” and the Stigmatization of Fujian Merchants in Macao in Late Ming Dynasty

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

“闽揽”与明中后期入澳闽商的“污名化”现象

作者简介:张侃，厦门大学历史系教授（福建厦门361005）

English Abstract

“Minlan” and the Stigmatization of Fujian Merchants in Macao in Late Ming Dynasty

全文HTML

目录

“闽揽”与明中后期入澳闽商的“污名化”现象—以《盟水斋存牍》若干案例为中心

作者简介: 张侃，厦门大学历史系教授（福建厦门361005）;

“Minlan” and the Stigmatization of Fujian Merchants in Macao in Late Ming Dynasty

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

“闽揽”与明中后期入澳闽商的“污名化”现象

作者简介:张侃，厦门大学历史系教授（福建厦门361005）

English Abstract

“Minlan” and the Stigmatization of Fujian Merchants in Macao in Late Ming Dynasty

全文HTML

目录