Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 54 Issue 6
November 2022
Article Contents

Citation: Huihua NIE, Guangwu LI and Chen LI. The Eight Key Questions about Subsidies for Enterprises[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 47-60. shu

The Eight Key Questions about Subsidies for Enterprises

  • Subsidies given to enterprises by the government are one of the most important tools for the government to implement industrial policy. However, whether government subsidies can improve the efficiency of enterprises has been a controversial theoretical and policy issue. Based on data on various types of subsidies for A-share listed companies in China from 2003 to 2020, this paper provides a comprehensive examination of the stylized facts, influencing factors and effects of government subsidies. The main findings of this paper are: (1) The vast majority of listed companies received government subsidies and the total amount of subsidies is growing. Total government subsidies in 2019 were approximately 0.44%-1.15% of GDP in that year. (2) Contrary to “common sense”, there is significant size discrimination in government subsidies to firms, but not significant ownership discrimination. (3) Government subsidies increase R&D and reduce the tax burden of private firms, but have no significant effect on SOEs. Categorically, tax, R&D and talent subsidies are generally effective, while industrial upgrading subsidies produce negative results. In the long run, the effect of government subsidies on firms’ financial performance is insignificant, but may be beneficial in promoting R&D. (4) Fiscal subsidies have better short-term effects than tax incentives, while the latter have better long-term effects. The findings of this paper have important implications for the tax reduction and industrial policy.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Yongqin WANG . How Industrial Policies Work. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(2): 37-55.

    2. [2]

      Zhao CHEN . Industrial Policies with Great Power Governance. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(1): 46-57, 82.

    3. [3]

      Jing JIANGBingyao ZHANG . Deconstruction and Transformation: An Analysis of China’s Industrial Policy in Political Economy Perspective. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(12): 59-70.

    4. [4]

      Shuguang ZHANGChi ZHANG . Institution Economics of the Right. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(1): 40-51, 83.

    5. [5]

      Huihua NIE . From Collusion to Cooperation between Government and Business. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(6): 44-56.

    6. [6]

      SUN Rui . Human-centered and Credit in Historical Experience— Based on the Old-style Chinese Private Banks with the Credit Loan in Modern Times. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 53-64.

    7. [7]

      Zhibiao LIU . The Framework, Challenges and Countermeasures of a High-level Socialist Market Economy System. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(4): 82-90.

    8. [8]

      . Industrial Policy, Firm Exit and Regional Production Efficiency Dynamics in China. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(04): 33-45.

    9. [9]

      . The Mystery of Middle-and-Small Scaled Private Zombie Firms. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(03): 75-86.

    10. [10]

      Zhiyang LIULufeng WANG . The Emergence Logic of Social Enterprise in China. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(10): 82-91.

    11. [11]

      Tie LYUZaichi LI . Digital Transformation in Manufacturing SMEs. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(10): 59-69.

    12. [12]

      Zhiyang LIUYongchang CHEN . Social Enterprise’ Hybrid Logic and Cross-sectoral Collaboration. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 85-98.

    13. [13]

      Shaoqing HUANGSiyi PANHao SHI . Anti-Corruption, Transformation of Government-Business Relationships and Firm Performance. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(12): 25-40.

    14. [14]

      Jie ZHANG . How Does Bank Competition Affect Firm Debt Ratio. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(1): 34-49.

    15. [15]

      Keyun ZHANGMin LIU . Media Concern and Corporate Social Responsibility Performance. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 57-71.

    16. [16]

      Changyuan LUOZiqi LIU . The Impact of Economic Slowdown on Entrepreneurship. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(9): 46-59.

    17. [17]

      Dapeng ZHOU . Entrepreneurship and Schumpeterian Growth and Transformation of China’s Economy. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(7): 57-68.

    18. [18]

      Changyuan LUOZhitao CHEN . Going Global and Production Capacity Utilization of Enterprises. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(1): 63-79.

    19. [19]

      Miaojie YUXiaotong WANG . China-ASEAN Free Trade Agreement and Chinese Enterprise Productivity. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 50-62.

    20. [20]

      Da’an HE . Stages and Conditions of the Enterprise Digital Transformation. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 38-49.

Figures(2) / Tables(8)

Article Metrics

Article views: 544 Times PDF downloads: 0 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(0)
  • Abstract views(544)
  • HTML views(23)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
          通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
          • 1. 

            沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

          1. 本站搜索
          2. 百度学术搜索
          3. 万方数据库搜索
          4. CNKI搜索

          The Eight Key Questions about Subsidies for Enterprises

          Abstract: Subsidies given to enterprises by the government are one of the most important tools for the government to implement industrial policy. However, whether government subsidies can improve the efficiency of enterprises has been a controversial theoretical and policy issue. Based on data on various types of subsidies for A-share listed companies in China from 2003 to 2020, this paper provides a comprehensive examination of the stylized facts, influencing factors and effects of government subsidies. The main findings of this paper are: (1) The vast majority of listed companies received government subsidies and the total amount of subsidies is growing. Total government subsidies in 2019 were approximately 0.44%-1.15% of GDP in that year. (2) Contrary to “common sense”, there is significant size discrimination in government subsidies to firms, but not significant ownership discrimination. (3) Government subsidies increase R&D and reduce the tax burden of private firms, but have no significant effect on SOEs. Categorically, tax, R&D and talent subsidies are generally effective, while industrial upgrading subsidies produce negative results. In the long run, the effect of government subsidies on firms’ financial performance is insignificant, but may be beneficial in promoting R&D. (4) Fiscal subsidies have better short-term effects than tax incentives, while the latter have better long-term effects. The findings of this paper have important implications for the tax reduction and industrial policy.

            HTML

          Figure (2)  Table (8) Relative (20)

          目录

          /

          DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
          Return