基因编辑与人的尊严

刘静

English

基因编辑与人的尊严

刘静

引用本文: 刘静. 基因编辑与人的尊严[J]. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(9): 28-37. shu

Citation: Jing LIU. Gene Editing and Human Dignity[J]. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 28-37. shu

基因编辑与人的尊严—关于基因技术革命的伦理学思考

刘静

作者简介: 刘静，东北师范大学马克思主义学部哲学院副教授（吉林长春 130024）;

中图分类号: B82

Gene Editing and Human Dignity

Jing LIU

Available Online: 2021-09-20
CLC number: B82

摘要: 生物技术革命所带来的基因编辑技术，使人类充当“上帝”的角色，成为自身的造物主，具有“设计生命”和“人的再造”的能力，但这一技术革命却带来了对人类尊严的存在论根基的严重挑战，引发了最深刻的伦理学新问题。当代自由主义优生学者提出，人类能够以“玩弄上帝”的方式去改变和重新创造人类自身，而这一再创造的存在论后果却是一个悖谬：人类在获得极度自由的同时，却摧毁了人之为人的尊严的根基，从而彻底失去生命存在的自由本性。按照康德的教诲，尊严是人之为人的最高伦理价值，尊严并不仅仅是出于个体自主性的“权利”和“自尊”，而是出于普遍道德自主性之上的“责任”和“敬重”，人的自由本性的道德自律才是人的尊严和崇高所在。后形而上学思想家进一步发展了康德的尊严观点，在他者和公共性维度上提出一种建立在承认、交互性和交往共同体基础之上的新尊严理论。面对生物技术的滥用和人类尊严受到的挑战，伦理学需要保卫和重建尊严概念，在“自由者的共在关系”中寻求尊严的基础和规范性的力量，从开放的“我们”推演出对“未来人”的责任。
- 尊严 /
- 基因编辑 /
- 道德自主性 /
- 权利 /
- 责任
Abstract: The revolution of gene technology and development of gene editing technology empower human beings to play the God’s role and become their own creator, with the ability to design life and recreate human beings, however, the revolution of gene technology has brought serous challenges to the ontological foundation of human dignity, which raises the most profound new ethical issues. Contemporary liberal Eugenist put forward that the human beings can be able to change and recreate human beings by “playing god”, but its ontological consequence is a paradoxical, when human beings gain the greatest freedom, at the same time, they destroy the foundation of the dignity of human beings, finally, they lost the freedom nature of life completely. According to Kant’s view, dignity is the highest ethical value of human beings, and dignity is not only derived from the “right” and “self-esteem” of individual autonomy, but also from the “responsibility” and “respect” of universal moral autonomy. The foundation of human beings’ dignity and sublime lie in the universal legislative ability of freedom nature of human beings. In addition, the post-metaphysical philosopher further developed Kant’s theory of dignity and put forward a new theory of dignity, based on recognition, interactivity and communicative community, in the dimension of otherness and publicity. In the face of the abuse of biotechnology and the challenge to human dignity, it is necessary to defend and reconstruct the foundation of human dignity. This paper will seek the foundation and normative power of dignity in the co-existence of human beings, and derive the responsibility to the “future man” from the open “we”.
- dignity /
- gene editing /
- moral autonomy /
- right /
- responsibility
1. [1]
  刘静 . “人格化原则”取消的代价与责任者的观点. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(3): 35-44, 139.
2. [2]
  卞绍斌 . 走出自然状态：康德与公共法权的证成. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(6): 13-31.
3. [3]
  卞绍斌 . 尊严与必然性：康德伦理思想的伍德式阐释. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(6): 31-44.
4. [4]
  马天航，熊觉 . 理解“国家自主性”：基于概念的考察. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(8): 80-92.
5. [5]
  汪仲启 . 指派责任制：回应性政府建构的一种有效机制. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(11): 84-95, 120.
6. [6]
  董磊明 , 邹松 . 中国村社自主性与外部资源的内部化. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(6): 71-83.
7. [7]
  姚大志 . 论权利的基础. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(9): 5-13.
8. [8]
  胡玉鸿 . 合理区隔：维系人的尊严必需的距离空间. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(12): 106-120.
9. [9]
  姚尚建 . 权利与共同体. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(11): 70-78.
10. [10]
  朱圆 . 脆弱性理论与国家治理责任新解. 学术月刊, 2017, 49(03): 81-90.
11. [11]
  张可云 , 刘敏 . 媒体关注与企业社会责任履行. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(9): 57-71.
12. [12]
  纪竞垚 , 刘守英 . 代际革命与农民的城市权利. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(7): 43-55.
13. [13]
  陈钊 , 王旸 , 黄伟 . 中国的企业在尽怎样的社会责任 —— 来自民营部门调查的证据. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(03): 37-47.
14. [14]
  马洪 , 王致民 . 环境污染责任保险法律定位及其体系构建. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(11): 96-106.
15. [15]
  孙万怀 . 一种“甜蜜的错觉”：自由意志是刑事责任的基础. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(8): 106-122.
16. [16]
  冯克利 . 传统与权利——《独立宣言》再解读. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(02): 76-87.
17. [17]
  陈堂发 . 媒介文化：伦理抑或权利范畴生活方式. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(12): 151-158, 179.
18. [18]
  吴莹 , 周飞舟 . 空间身份权利：转居农民的市民化实践. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(10): 142-153.
19. [19]
  刘守英，李昊泽 . 权利开放与农民的共同富裕. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(8): 41-60.
20. [20]
  周建波 . 中国道路的历史基因. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(3): 58-62.

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 18
文章访问数: 925
HTML全文浏览量: 149

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

基因编辑与人的尊严

刘静

作者简介:刘静，东北师范大学马克思主义学部哲学院副教授（吉林长春 130024）

网络出版日期: 2021-09-20

关键词:

摘要: 生物技术革命所带来的基因编辑技术，使人类充当“上帝”的角色，成为自身的造物主，具有“设计生命”和“人的再造”的能力，但这一技术革命却带来了对人类尊严的存在论根基的严重挑战，引发了最深刻的伦理学新问题。当代自由主义优生学者提出，人类能够以“玩弄上帝”的方式去改变和重新创造人类自身，而这一再创造的存在论后果却是一个悖谬：人类在获得极度自由的同时，却摧毁了人之为人的尊严的根基，从而彻底失去生命存在的自由本性。按照康德的教诲，尊严是人之为人的最高伦理价值，尊严并不仅仅是出于个体自主性的“权利”和“自尊”，而是出于普遍道德自主性之上的“责任”和“敬重”，人的自由本性的道德自律才是人的尊严和崇高所在。后形而上学思想家进一步发展了康德的尊严观点，在他者和公共性维度上提出一种建立在承认、交互性和交往共同体基础之上的新尊严理论。面对生物技术的滥用和人类尊严受到的挑战，伦理学需要保卫和重建尊严概念，在“自由者的共在关系”中寻求尊严的基础和规范性的力量，从开放的“我们”推演出对“未来人”的责任。

English Abstract

Gene Editing and Human Dignity

Jing LIU

Available Online: 2021-09-20

Abstract: The revolution of gene technology and development of gene editing technology empower human beings to play the God’s role and become their own creator, with the ability to design life and recreate human beings, however, the revolution of gene technology has brought serous challenges to the ontological foundation of human dignity, which raises the most profound new ethical issues. Contemporary liberal Eugenist put forward that the human beings can be able to change and recreate human beings by “playing god”, but its ontological consequence is a paradoxical, when human beings gain the greatest freedom, at the same time, they destroy the foundation of the dignity of human beings, finally, they lost the freedom nature of life completely. According to Kant’s view, dignity is the highest ethical value of human beings, and dignity is not only derived from the “right” and “self-esteem” of individual autonomy, but also from the “responsibility” and “respect” of universal moral autonomy. The foundation of human beings’ dignity and sublime lie in the universal legislative ability of freedom nature of human beings. In addition, the post-metaphysical philosopher further developed Kant’s theory of dignity and put forward a new theory of dignity, based on recognition, interactivity and communicative community, in the dimension of otherness and publicity. In the face of the abuse of biotechnology and the challenge to human dignity, it is necessary to defend and reconstruct the foundation of human dignity. This paper will seek the foundation and normative power of dignity in the co-existence of human beings, and derive the responsibility to the “future man” from the open “we”.

基因编辑与人的尊严—关于基因技术革命的伦理学思考

作者简介: 刘静，东北师范大学马克思主义学部哲学院副教授（吉林长春 130024）;

Gene Editing and Human Dignity

计量

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

基因编辑与人的尊严

作者简介:刘静，东北师范大学马克思主义学部哲学院副教授（吉林长春 130024）

English Abstract

Gene Editing and Human Dignity

全文HTML

目录

基因编辑与人的尊严—关于基因技术革命的伦理学思考

作者简介: 刘静，东北师范大学马克思主义学部哲学院副教授（吉林长春 130024）;

Gene Editing and Human Dignity

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

基因编辑与人的尊严

作者简介:刘静，东北师范大学马克思主义学部哲学院副教授（吉林长春 130024）

English Abstract

Gene Editing and Human Dignity

全文HTML

目录