关系现在主义的构建

刘拥华; 孙宇凡

PDF
Cite
Share

facebook

twitter

google

linkedin

May 2023

Article Contents

Citation: Yonghua LIU and Yufan SUN. The Structure of Relational Presentism[J]. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(3): 126-139. shu

The Structure of Relational Presentism

Yonghua LIU ,
Yufan SUN

Abstract

This article attempts to interpret George Herbert Mead’s social theory from the perspective of time. Mead’s unsystematic writing presents a dilemma because he begins by using the solipsistic duration as the foundation for his social theory of time. To solve this problem, this article reframes Mead’s theory as “relational presentism.” Although the duration of self implies an egoist orientation, it means that Mead stresses the conception of “present” by which he develops a relational approach to connecting his theory of time with that of self. This article builds connections between memory/past/me and anticipation/future/I to demonstrate this approach. Accordingly, the core argument of relational presentism is the relationality of self and time.
- George Mead,
- time,
- relation,
- presentism,
- self
References
Access
1. [1]
  Shipeng WANG . “The Phenomenological Turn” in Self Research and New Resolution of Self-paradox. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(2): 20-29, 19.
2. [2]
  Xinmin GAO , Rui LU . Identity Crisis and Narrative Self Theory. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 31-42.
3. [3]
  Xinmin GAO , Jiajia GUO . The Psychogeographical Research of Self-consciousness. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 17-26.
4. [4]
  Zhu XU . A Constitutivist Theory of Self-Knowledge. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 30-38.
5. [5]
  JIA Wenjuan . The Body of Labor, the Mind of Capital——Self Capitalization and the Formation of the Laborers Ideology in Late Neoliberalism. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(12): 112-121.
6. [6]
  Yicai NI . The Structural Difficulty of the Foundational Self-Consciousness. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(7): 27-34.
7. [7]
  HUANGFU Xin， CHEN Guoquan . Self-reform Politics and Functional Separation of Power Theory. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(9): 68-76.
8. [8]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(04): 29-39.
9. [9]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(04): 125-133.
10. [10]
  BI Xuling . The Time Pedigree of the Solar Term Myth Narrative and the Innovative Characteristics of Chinese Civilization. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(1): 155-163.
11. [11]
  Yunyan ZHANG . The Time Consciousness of the Manuscript of New Stories and Its Inspiration for the Study of Memory. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(12): 142-150.
12. [12]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(01): 36-41.
13. [13]
  LIU Daosheng . The Grassroots Administration and Officialgentry Relationship of Huizhou in Early Qing Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(7): 190-203.
14. [14]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(08): 51-57.
15. [15]
  . . Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(6): 24-29.
16. [16]
  YU Keping . On the Collective-Individual Relationship in Traditional China through the Lens of Collective Punishment. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(5): 65-82.
17. [17]
  Shaoqing HUANG , Siyi PAN , Hao SHI . Anti-Corruption, Transformation of Government-Business Relationships and Firm Performance. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(12): 25-40.
18. [18]
  Sheng LI . The Civil-Military Relation in the American Constitutional System: Traditions and Transitions. Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(12): 86-96.
19. [19]
  , . . Academic Monthly, 2017, 49(07): 120-126.
20. [20]
  Ruichang LI . An Outline of Policy Knowledge System Based on Policy Relations. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 73-84.

Figures(2) / Tables(1)

Get Citation

PDF

XML

Entire Issue PDF

Article Metrics

Article views: 307 Times PDF downloads: 1 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics

PDF Downloads(1)
Abstract views(307)
HTML views(44)

Latest
Most Read
Most Cited

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

The Structure of Relational Presentism

Yonghua LIU
Yufan SUN

Available Online: 2023-03-20

Abstract: This article attempts to interpret George Herbert Mead’s social theory from the perspective of time. Mead’s unsystematic writing presents a dilemma because he begins by using the solipsistic duration as the foundation for his social theory of time. To solve this problem, this article reframes Mead’s theory as “relational presentism.” Although the duration of self implies an egoist orientation, it means that Mead stresses the conception of “present” by which he develops a relational approach to connecting his theory of time with that of self. This article builds connections between memory/past/me and anticipation/future/I to demonstrate this approach. Accordingly, the core argument of relational presentism is the relationality of self and time.

HTML

Figure (2) Table (1) Relative (20)

DownLoad: Full-Size Img PowerPoint

Return

The Structure of Relational Presentism

Abstract

References

Access

Article Metrics

Metrics

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

The Structure of Relational Presentism

HTML

目录