Welcome to visit ACADEMIC MONTHLY,Today is

Volume 51 Issue 4
April 2019
Article Contents

Citation: Yanhong LIU. To Promote the Development of the Discourse System of Criminal Law by Scientific Legislation[J]. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(4): 94-105. shu

To Promote the Development of the Discourse System of Criminal Law by Scientific Legislation

  • How to form a discourse system of criminal law with Chinese characteristics is an important problem. As the guarantee of all branch laws, criminal law should be guided by scientific legislation to promote the development of the discourse system of criminal law. In the past 40 years of reform and opening up, China’s criminal legislation has experienced a changing from extensive to symbolic forms, there is a gap between them and the new era’s requirements for scientific legislation. Therefore, scientific legislation should be used to promote high-quality criminal legislation. Through legislating, reforming, abolishing and interpreting, criminal law should be gradually developed into clearly defined, effective and fair law, and finally become a real good law to achieve good governance, so as to promote the further development of socialistic legal system. The concept of leniency and severity, equality between crime and punishment, proviso in the concept of crime, etc., are all formed by the establishment of Chinese criminal legislation and the refinement of the theory of criminal law, and are actually the discourse between the criminal law with Chinese cultural elements of the rule of law. The future of China’s criminal jurisprudence shall be achieved by the innovation and development of the discourse system of criminal law with Chinese characteristics through criminal legislation and the joint efforts of jurists, to enhance the international confidence of China’s criminal jurisprudence, and spread the powerful voice of Chinese criminal rule of law in international community.
  • 加载中
    1. [1]

      Xudong CHENLin CHENG . Research on History of Modern Chinese Economic Thought and Construction of Academic Discourse System in the New Era. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(6): 45-52.

    2. [2]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(04): 5-10.

    3. [3]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(07): 140-156.

    4. [4]

      Haibo SUN . Reflections on Moral Legislation from the Perspective of Legal Philosophy. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(5): 106-119.

    5. [5]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(02): 103-113.

    6. [6]

      Xiaobai CHU . On the Family-Nation Discourse and Its Symbolic Structure during the Anti-Foreign-Religion Movement in Late Qing Dynasty. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(3): 146-159.

    7. [7]

      Lei LEI . The Characteristics of Legislation. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(1): 97-108.

    8. [8]

      XIE Jing . A Comparative Research of Property Crime System in The Qing Code. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(10): 99-108.

    9. [9]

      Fei WU . On the Argumentation of the Empirical Laws in Criminal Judicial Decision. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 99-110.

    10. [10]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(03): 80-89.

    11. [11]

      Xiaoliang ZHOU . Inclusive Green Development: Theoretical Interpretation and Institutional Support System. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(11): 41-54.

    12. [12]

      WU Siyuan . From “Power Orientation” to “Right Standard”:Contravention and Return of Rule of Law in Criminal Online Litigation. Academic Monthly, 2024, 56(2): 124-135.

    13. [13]

      SUN Wanhuai . Is Free Will the Rational Basis of Responsibilitism. Academic Monthly, 2023, 55(8): 106-122.

    14. [14]

      . . Academic Monthly, 2016, 48(10): 30-35.

    15. [15]

      Shangjun ZHOU . The Organizational Formation and System Logic of China’s Legislative System. Academic Monthly, 2020, 52(11): 95-107.

    16. [16]

      YE Wenping . . Academic Monthly, 2018, 50(6): 78-88.

    17. [17]

      Zao ZHANG . Liang Zongdai and Symbolist Poetics. Academic Monthly, 2019, 51(1): 135-149.

    18. [18]

      Zhiwen YANG . The Nature of “Treating Like Cases Alike” and Its Justification. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(11): 111-122.

    19. [19]

      Bohai CHEN . An Interpretation of Confucian View of “Sentiment and Disposition”. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(9): 151-158.

    20. [20]

      Ping FU . Creating Leading-edge Integrated Governance: The Governance Innovation of Poverty Alleviation in China. Academic Monthly, 2021, 53(7): 121-131.

Article Metrics

Article views: 1823 Times PDF downloads: 3 Times Cited by: 0 Times

Metrics
  • PDF Downloads(3)
  • Abstract views(1823)
  • HTML views(93)
  • Latest
  • Most Read
  • Most Cited
        通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com
        • 1. 

          沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院 沈阳 110142

        1. 本站搜索
        2. 百度学术搜索
        3. 万方数据库搜索
        4. CNKI搜索

        To Promote the Development of the Discourse System of Criminal Law by Scientific Legislation

        Abstract: How to form a discourse system of criminal law with Chinese characteristics is an important problem. As the guarantee of all branch laws, criminal law should be guided by scientific legislation to promote the development of the discourse system of criminal law. In the past 40 years of reform and opening up, China’s criminal legislation has experienced a changing from extensive to symbolic forms, there is a gap between them and the new era’s requirements for scientific legislation. Therefore, scientific legislation should be used to promote high-quality criminal legislation. Through legislating, reforming, abolishing and interpreting, criminal law should be gradually developed into clearly defined, effective and fair law, and finally become a real good law to achieve good governance, so as to promote the further development of socialistic legal system. The concept of leniency and severity, equality between crime and punishment, proviso in the concept of crime, etc., are all formed by the establishment of Chinese criminal legislation and the refinement of the theory of criminal law, and are actually the discourse between the criminal law with Chinese cultural elements of the rule of law. The future of China’s criminal jurisprudence shall be achieved by the innovation and development of the discourse system of criminal law with Chinese characteristics through criminal legislation and the joint efforts of jurists, to enhance the international confidence of China’s criminal jurisprudence, and spread the powerful voice of Chinese criminal rule of law in international community.

          HTML

        Relative (20)

        目录

        /

        DownLoad:  Full-Size Img  PowerPoint
        Return