国际比较文学的新格局：中国学者的贡献

王宁

English

国际比较文学的新格局：中国学者的贡献

王宁

引用本文: 王宁. 国际比较文学的新格局：中国学者的贡献[J]. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(4): 144-154. shu

Citation: Ning WANG. Toward a New Framework of International Comparative Literature: Chinese Scholars’ Contributions[J]. Academic Monthly, 2022, 54(4): 144-154. shu

国际比较文学的新格局：中国学者的贡献

王宁

作者简介: 王宁，上海交通大学人文学院资深教授，欧洲科学院外籍院士（上海 200240）;

中图分类号: I0

Toward a New Framework of International Comparative Literature: Chinese Scholars’ Contributions

Ning WANG

Available Online: 2022-04-20
CLC number: I0

摘要

例如学者曹顺庆的英文专著已引起了国际学界的瞩目，参阅：Cao Shunqing, The Variation Theory of Comparative Literature, Heidelberg: Springer, 2014, 以及张江关于“强制阐释”问题的系列论文也发表在国际人文社会科学主流刊物上，参阅Zhang Jiang and J. Hillis Miller, “Exchange of Letters about Literary Theory between Zhang Jiang and J. Hillis Miller,” Comparative Literature Studies, Vol. 53 (2016), No. 3, 567-610；Zhang Jiang, “Is the ‘Intention’ There? On the Impact of Scientism on Hermeneutics,” European Review, Vol. 26 (2018), No. 2, 381-394; “On Imposed Interpretation and Chinese Construction of Literary Theory,” Modern Language Quarterly, Vol. 79 (2018), No. 3, 269-288; “On Theory-Centrism: The ‘Literary Theory’ Void of Literature,” Philosophy and Literature, Vol. 44 (2020), No. 1, 88-104. 这方面的一个最近的例子就是我本人应邀为劳特里奇《翻译方法论》手册撰写其中的“比较文学与世界文学”(Comparative Literature and World Literature)章节，而在过去，这样的基本理论方面的章节必定邀请欧美学者撰写。Cf. Chris Rundle and Federico Zanettin eds., Routledge Handbook of Translation Methodology, London and New York: Routledge, 2021.
HTML全文
图(0) 表(0)
参考文献(0)
相关文章
引证文献
资源附件(0)
访问统计

摘要: 比较文学法国学派的当代传人佛朗哥前几年在一本新著中提出，当今比较文学的一个大趋势就是跨学科研究：其一是文学与科学，其二是文学与其他艺术。他在结论中呼唤一种比较美学的诞生。显然，即使是被人们认为最保守的法国学派学者也认识到了比较文学跨学科研究的大趋势，并试图在这方面有所作为。美国比较文学学者苏源熙十多年前曾认为，比较文学学科“扮演的是为乐团的其他乐器定调的第一小提琴”的角色。但最近十年报告的主持人海斯却没有对美国比较文学研究的跨学科研究现状给予高度的评价，其中一个重要原因就在于，学者在致力于与其他人文社会科学分支学科的跨界比较研究的同时，却在科技人文的跨界研究中反应迟钝，且著述不多。这与人文学者所受到的多学科，尤其是自然科学和技术学科的训练不足有很大关系。这正是中国的比较文学学者在新文科视域下进入国际学术前沿并发挥领军作用的一个极好机遇，在这方面，中国学者近期的研究成果已经而且将继续为国际比较文学新格局的形成作出自己的贡献。
- 国际比较文学 /
- 中国比较文学 /
- 新格局 /
- 跨学科研究 /
- 新文科
Abstract: Bernard Franco, a contemporary successor of the “French School” in comparative literature, argued in a book published a few years ago that one of the great trends of comparative literature studies now is that of interdisciplinarity: that is the comparative study between literature and science, and that between literature and other arts. In his conclusion, he calls for the birth of a comparative aesthetics. Apparently, even the most “conservative” French scholars recognize the interdisciplinary trend in current international comparative literature studies and are trying to contribute to it. More than a decade ago, American comparatist HaunSaussy argued that comparative literature plays the role of “the first violin that sets the tone for the rest of the orchestra”. But Ursula K. Heise, the host of the last decade’s report of the American Comparative Literature Association, does not highly praise the current state of the interdisciplinarity of comparative literature, and one of the main reasons for that is that, while scholars are satisfied with the cross-border comparative study with other branches of humanities and social sciences, they are slow to respond to the cross-border study between the humanities and science and technology and seldom write about it. This has much to do with the inadequate training of humanists in many disciplines, especially natural sciences and technological disciplines. In view of this, we believe that this is a precious opportunity for China’s comparatists to enter the international forefront and play a leading role in the new liberal arts vision. The recent research results achieved by Chinese scholars has contributed, and will continue to contribute, to the formation of a new framework of international comparative literature.
- international comparative literature /
- Chinese comparative literature /
- interdisciplinary studies /
- new framework /
- New Liberal Arts
1. [1]
  纪建勋 . 中国比较文学复兴四十年学科方法论整体观. 学术月刊, 2018, 50(10): 140-149.
2. [2]
  武新军 . 文学跨学科研究的方法与价值. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(5): 162-167.
3. [3]
  ● 王宁 , ○ 邹理 . 走向世界的中国比较文学和文学理论研究. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(4): 210-216.
4. [4]
  郭西安 , ［美］柯马丁 . 早期中国研究与比较古代学的挑战：汉学和比较文学的对话. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(8): 149-162.
5. [5]
  纪建勋 . 中国比较文学的滥觞及其方法论意义. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(1): 164-175.
6. [6]
  叶舒宪 . 人类学转向：新文科的跨学科引领. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(8): 143-154.
7. [7]
  郭惠芬 . 中国现当代文学学科研究的一个新视域. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(12): 121-132, 141.
8. [8]
  郑江淮 , 张睿 , 陈英武 . 中国经济发展的数字化转型：新阶段、新理念、新格局. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(7): 45-54, 66.
9. [9]
  唐启翠 . 新文科理念下《文心雕龙》题名匠心再研究. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(8): 155-162.
10. [10]
  吴翔宇 . 百年中国儿童文学跨学科拓展的依据、路径与反思. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(7): 146-154.
11. [11]
  吴俊 . 文学史和跨学科学术——文学史周期律和文体文类的功能. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(5): 150-156.
12. [12]
  ● 文贵良 , ○ 凤媛 . 从话语生存论到现代汉语诗学：回归新文学本位研究. 学术月刊, 2021, 53(12): 206-211.
13. [13]
  於嘉，何雨辰 . 国际比较视野下中国家庭特征的转变. 学术月刊, 2024, 56(3): 129-142.
14. [14]
  王海晗，文贵良 . 中国现当代文学研究. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(12): 191-198.
15. [15]
  符杰祥 . “忘却”的辩证法—— 鲁迅的启蒙之“梦”与中国新文学的兴起. 学术月刊, 2016, 48(12): 111-121.
16. [16]
  程大中 , 虞丽 , 汪宁 . 服务业对外开放与自由化：基本趋势、国际比较与中国对策. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(11): 40-59.
17. [17]
  金进 . 海外华人社群的分化与维新文人的文学记忆. 学术月刊, 2019, 51(12): 133-141.
18. [18]
  钟祥财 . 中西传统经济思想的比较研究. 学术月刊, 2020, 52(3): 50-53.
19. [19]
  . 国际英文期刊《中国文学与文化》第九卷十七期目录. 学术月刊, 2022, 54(5): 1-2.
20. [20]
  李定广 . 唐宋文学研究. 学术月刊, 2023, 55(11): 203-208.

点击查看大图

计量

PDF下载量: 0
文章访问数: 280
HTML全文浏览量: 19

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

1.
沈阳化工大学材料科学与工程学院沈阳 110142

国际比较文学的新格局：中国学者的贡献

王宁

作者简介:王宁，上海交通大学人文学院资深教授，欧洲科学院外籍院士（上海 200240）

网络出版日期: 2022-04-20

关键词:

摘要: 比较文学法国学派的当代传人佛朗哥前几年在一本新著中提出，当今比较文学的一个大趋势就是跨学科研究：其一是文学与科学，其二是文学与其他艺术。他在结论中呼唤一种比较美学的诞生。显然，即使是被人们认为最保守的法国学派学者也认识到了比较文学跨学科研究的大趋势，并试图在这方面有所作为。美国比较文学学者苏源熙十多年前曾认为，比较文学学科“扮演的是为乐团的其他乐器定调的第一小提琴”的角色。但最近十年报告的主持人海斯却没有对美国比较文学研究的跨学科研究现状给予高度的评价，其中一个重要原因就在于，学者在致力于与其他人文社会科学分支学科的跨界比较研究的同时，却在科技人文的跨界研究中反应迟钝，且著述不多。这与人文学者所受到的多学科，尤其是自然科学和技术学科的训练不足有很大关系。这正是中国的比较文学学者在新文科视域下进入国际学术前沿并发挥领军作用的一个极好机遇，在这方面，中国学者近期的研究成果已经而且将继续为国际比较文学新格局的形成作出自己的贡献。

English Abstract

Toward a New Framework of International Comparative Literature: Chinese Scholars’ Contributions

Ning WANG

Available Online: 2022-04-20

Abstract: Bernard Franco, a contemporary successor of the “French School” in comparative literature, argued in a book published a few years ago that one of the great trends of comparative literature studies now is that of interdisciplinarity: that is the comparative study between literature and science, and that between literature and other arts. In his conclusion, he calls for the birth of a comparative aesthetics. Apparently, even the most “conservative” French scholars recognize the interdisciplinary trend in current international comparative literature studies and are trying to contribute to it. More than a decade ago, American comparatist HaunSaussy argued that comparative literature plays the role of “the first violin that sets the tone for the rest of the orchestra”. But Ursula K. Heise, the host of the last decade’s report of the American Comparative Literature Association, does not highly praise the current state of the interdisciplinarity of comparative literature, and one of the main reasons for that is that, while scholars are satisfied with the cross-border comparative study with other branches of humanities and social sciences, they are slow to respond to the cross-border study between the humanities and science and technology and seldom write about it. This has much to do with the inadequate training of humanists in many disciplines, especially natural sciences and technological disciplines. In view of this, we believe that this is a precious opportunity for China’s comparatists to enter the international forefront and play a leading role in the new liberal arts vision. The recent research results achieved by Chinese scholars has contributed, and will continue to contribute, to the formation of a new framework of international comparative literature.

国际比较文学的新格局：中国学者的贡献

作者简介: 王宁，上海交通大学人文学院资深教授，欧洲科学院外籍院士（上海 200240）;

Toward a New Framework of International Comparative Literature: Chinese Scholars’ Contributions

计量

文章相关

通讯作者: 陈斌, bchen63@163.com

国际比较文学的新格局：中国学者的贡献

作者简介:王宁，上海交通大学人文学院资深教授，欧洲科学院外籍院士（上海 200240）

English Abstract

Toward a New Framework of International Comparative Literature: Chinese Scholars’ Contributions

全文HTML

目录